GT40s.com - View Single Post - RF Situation - A bit of information related to other posts

RobBeddington · 03-21-06, 05:26 PM

Ron

This situation beggars belief. $420,000 in deposits and only 8 of the 26 orders being passed by RF Aus to Camco SA? That's a whole lot more sinister than the 'difficult trading' mentioned in other threads.

Although the guys posting messages of support for RF may not have known the full story, your initial post was pretty clear to me, and I find these messages a tad offensive to the 26 of you affected by this.

The only thing that stopped me going for the RF when the turnkey minus was announced was the bodyshape. IMHO the area between the nostril and the windscreen, so similar to the Tornado (I wonder why that was?), just does not look right. I am extremely pleased that this relatively minor point put me off the idea.

All the very best to you and all those affected. In the meantime I take my hat off to you for your continued support of the forum. Others (me included) would probably have turned there back on it by now.

Rob

03-21-06, 05:26 PM	#4 (permalink)
RobBeddington 7 Tenths Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Magazine Editor (finance magazine) and Freelance Writer (classic car articles) GT40: Robin Hood Country, England Posts: 761 Rep Power: 12	Re: RF Situation - A bit of information related to other posts Ron This situation beggars belief. $420,000 in deposits and only 8 of the 26 orders being passed by RF Aus to Camco SA? That's a whole lot more sinister than the 'difficult trading' mentioned in other threads. Although the guys posting messages of support for RF may not have known the full story, your initial post was pretty clear to me, and I find these messages a tad offensive to the 26 of you affected by this. The only thing that stopped me going for the RF when the turnkey minus was announced was the bodyshape. IMHO the area between the nostril and the windscreen, so similar to the Tornado (I wonder why that was?), just does not look right. I am extremely pleased that this relatively minor point put me off the idea. All the very best to you and all those affected. In the meantime I take my hat off to you for your continued support of the forum. Others (me included) would probably have turned there back on it by now. Rob