GT40s.com - View Single Post

Jack · 03-20-08, 11:16 AM

Fran,

I want to build a RCR917K for SCCA and NASA racing in their Super Production and Super Modified classes respectively. (These are basically CanAm classes. "Run What You Brung". There's a guy in Arizona running a Lemans winning 962!) After I read Graham's story from a year ago about how time and money consuming the original suspension was to set up, my heart was broken. I have neither the time, knowledge, support or Money to spend a half season doing nothing but go to Lime Rock and dial in the suspension.

Since the mono tub is a big departure from originality, wouldn't a more user friendly geometry be a better choice? Since all your wonderful cars are mainly for street use, wouldn't this be a better criteria for all your cars?

Jack

03-20-08, 11:16 AM	#1 (permalink)
Jack JackN2469E Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Connecticut Posts: 3 Rep Power: 1	RCR917 suspension set up Fran, I want to build a RCR917K for SCCA and NASA racing in their Super Production and Super Modified classes respectively. (These are basically CanAm classes. "Run What You Brung". There's a guy in Arizona running a Lemans winning 962!) After I read Graham's story from a year ago about how time and money consuming the original suspension was to set up, my heart was broken. I have neither the time, knowledge, support or Money to spend a half season doing nothing but go to Lime Rock and dial in the suspension. Since the mono tub is a big departure from originality, wouldn't a more user friendly geometry be a better choice? Since all your wonderful cars are mainly for street use, wouldn't this be a better criteria for all your cars? Jack