I guess no one here reads the WSJ?
Let’s start a pool to see how soon Hillary will be dressed in an orange Mao suit��
Baloney Jeff....
There is nothing at all racist in that post by its content. Now could the post or birtherism be racially motivated? Certainly. But so can a thousand other things. The true fact is - we just donÂ’t know what is in peopleÂ’s hearts and minds as we have no way of actually reading them.
Point in fact, your recent posts could be construed as racist as well as age discriminatory... Were they racially motivated?
LOLOLOLOL.
So wait, let me see if I understand the Randy Doctrine:
Old white guy repeats completely baseless theory that first black American President is legit, a theory that is routinely kicked around in white supremacist circles. I point out that is racist when said by an old white guy. That some how makes me racist? Awesome. So pointing out racism is in itself racism? That's some twisted shit there dude. Did you do the same thing with the folks who pointed out that whites denying blacks access to schools or businesses or the vote? I gues they were racists too under the Randy Doctrine.
And yeah, Walt is a racist. He posted a racist theory that has no basis in fact, at all. We all know that. He did it anyway. Racist. That simple.
The race card has been waaaaaaaay overplayed, Counselor. Anyone whose view differs from that held by you and your ilk is alwaaaays automatically labeled a racist...or a 'bigot', 'hater', 'misogynist', 'Mexophobe', "...sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic - you name it" (Billary) in accordance with the principles outlined by your sides' hero Saul Alinsky in his book "Rules for Radicals" .[/COLOR]
[/COLOR]
When are you guys going to get a clue?