MK-I MK-II MK-III MK-IV GULF MIRAGE J-CAR LOLA
| Notices | Hi member,
welcome to GT40s.com! If you've never posted on the forum maybe give it a go by introducing yourself in the Introduce Yourself Here forum. Also, think about becoming a Forum Supporter at GT40s.com. Becoming a supporter will allow you more PM space, an avatar, and the money is used to keep GT40s.com running.
Enjoy the forum!
Welcome to the GT40s.com, the World’s Largest GT40 resource.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, view pictures, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, Join Our Community Today!
Why not start with your first post today and become an active part of GT40s.com now! And, if you find you enjoy GT40s.com think about becoming a Forum Supporter. | | All GT40 All GT40 Replica Talk - All the time! |
07-16-04, 02:42 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Rookie 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 5  | #1075 Body Accuracy I am in the intial stages of ordering a GT40 with the 1075 flares but have several questions. Which manufacturer makes the most accurate of the original. The CAV looks very good but the flares look too high and the lower panels under the doors look too squared off (gas tanks) which makes the cars side look too slab sided. The RF looks better but I do not have good enough pictures to compare. Someone on the forum here has a #1075 replica by RF but I cannot find the pictures. I have been comparing CAV pictures with one I took of the original 1075 at Road America and there is definitely a difference. Do you guys agree? What are your thoughts? Sorry to be soo long winded. |
| |
07-16-04, 05:29 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Fatal Attraction Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA GT40: Ex-DRB #35
Posts: 1,501
Rep Power: 23  | Re: #1075 Body Accuracy NSX,
Here are a cpuple of shots of the DRB flares. Sorry, but I
lost the Gulf scheme photos that I had (computer crash)
Bill |
| |
07-16-04, 05:29 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Fatal Attraction Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA GT40: Ex-DRB #35
Posts: 1,501
Rep Power: 23  | Re: #1075 Body Accuracy Another |
| |
07-16-04, 05:30 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Fatal Attraction Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA GT40: Ex-DRB #35
Posts: 1,501
Rep Power: 23  | Re: #1075 Body Accuracy One more |
| |
07-16-04, 06:10 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | 4 Tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 422
Rep Power: 9  | Re: #1075 Body Accuracy RF40 in gulf colours, with Hershal's RF40. BOTH very nice cars. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
| |
07-16-04, 06:11 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | 4 Tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 422
Rep Power: 9  | Re: #1075 Body Accuracy and this one |
| |
07-16-04, 12:32 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | ijvpet A Tenth 
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Calgary, Alberta GT40: CAV
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 6  | Re: #1075 Body Accuracy NSXER,
I understand what you are saying about accuracy importance (ie.the squared off gas tanks). However the beauty of the GT40 is that every angle makes a different picture. It wasn't until I saw a car personally did I come to the conclusion that pictures DO NOT do these cars justice. They are very curvy, low and well proportioned. My suggestion to you is to go out and see all these cars. You will make a more satisfying choice that way. |
| |
07-17-04, 01:56 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Chris Liokos 7 Tenths 
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Australia GT40: RF40
Posts: 775
Rep Power: 15  | Re: #1075 Body Accuracy NSXER,
My car was recently parked side-by-side with another 2 RF40s. I had people insist that my car had a different body shape to the others. I had to convince them that the only difference was the color... oh, and I agree with GT40LM. You have to see one in real life to truly understand its lines. |
| |
07-17-04, 05:07 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | CCX33911 10 tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2001 GT40: Virginia
Posts: 1,222
Rep Power: 19  | Re: #1075 Body Accuracy I have updated my website to include some shots from Monterey 2003 including 1075. You can compare the rear end of 1075 with those of the Blue CAV demonstrator. I think they agree quite well [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. Here are a couple of shots taken from slightly different angles: |
| |
07-17-04, 08:43 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Rookie 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 5  | Re: #1075 Body Accuracy Thanks for the pics. I took a ton of pictures of a Gulf painted CAV with flares at Road America last year as well as the original 1075 that was there. To me the RF flares and side tanks look better. The CAV flares look very good but bubble out more and do not smooth in with the body near the door as well. I would love more pics of the RF GT40 with Gulf paint though if anyone has some as well as a CAV with Gulf paint and flares. I think that a gentleman in Canada has one exactly as one I am planning on ordering one. I also think that the ride height of the car has a lot to do with it. The lower the better, especially with the taller (non-low profile) tires. Pictures do not do these cars justice. All of them look great but I am pretty particular especially when I will be putting down a large sum of money. |
| |
07-17-04, 08:59 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | CCX33911 10 tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2001 GT40: Virginia
Posts: 1,222
Rep Power: 19  | Re: #1075 Body Accuracy I understand that. Check with Ian Clarke and he should have several photos of the Gulf painted CAV. |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 AM.
|