MK-I MK-II MK-III MK-IV GULF MIRAGE J-CAR LOLA
| Notices | Hi member,
welcome to GT40s.com! If you've never posted on the forum maybe give it a go by introducing yourself in the Introduce Yourself Here forum. Also, think about becoming a Forum Supporter at GT40s.com. Becoming a supporter will allow you more PM space, an avatar, and the money is used to keep GT40s.com running.
Enjoy the forum!
Welcome to the GT40s.com, the World’s Largest GT40 resource.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, view pictures, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, Join Our Community Today!
Why not start with your first post today and become an active part of GT40s.com now! And, if you find you enjoy GT40s.com think about becoming a Forum Supporter. | | All GT40 All GT40 Replica Talk - All the time! |
07-12-06, 12:14 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Mesa 3 Tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Santa Clara, Ca GT40: SLC 001
Posts: 394
Rep Power: 6  | Windshield required. in CA. ? For persons who might know the answer.
Are dot class windshields required for a vehicle to be registered in California?
Are any windshields required? (as in North Carolina). Could you regester a T70 spider with the plexiglass wind deflector only.....? |
| |
07-12-06, 12:41 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Ron Earp Site Administrator 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,931
Rep Power: 57  | Don't know if it is required or not - I couldn't find anything that defined "windshield". One one interesting sentence from the NC DMV manual:
"1. Windshield wipers shall not be approved if:
(a) The vehicle is not equipped with a windshield wiper or wipers,
provided the vehicle has a windshield."
This indicates to me that vehicles without windsheilds are okay.
Best,
Ron |
| |
07-12-06, 01:10 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | 10 tenths 
Join Date: Jun 2002 GT40: San Francisco Bay Area California USA
Posts: 1,883
Rep Power: 25  | I broke my windshield a couple of years ago and while I was looking for a source I considered using a lexan replacement if I came up short. In the end I did find a new glass windshield.
Beyond the reasons not to use one on a street car, I never really got a straight answer from the DMV, BAR, or the Highway Patrol on this. I made at least two calls to the BAR and DMV in Sacramento and asked a couple of CHP and local police officers. Everyone had a different answer from why not to what is lexan? It will really come to the highway patrol sign off when you get your Vin tag put on.
If the CHP guy doesn't reject it then you will get by. At least that would be my guess. Most people will assume that the windshield is glass and be looking for cracks if they inspect it at all. If the first CPH office rejects it I would just go to another one and try it there. Once the title/registration process is done there really won't be another official reason to have a look at your car for the rest of it's life in Calif.
All in all I would try it and if you can't get it signed off then you would have to sorce a glass windshield. |
| |
07-12-06, 05:28 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | 5 Tenths 
Join Date: Feb 2004 GT40: So Cal
Posts: 546
Rep Power: 10  | I have a Porsche 550 Spyder registered in CA under SB100. No one looked at the windshield. Many of the spyder replaicas that I know of have small plexi windscreens and are registered no problem (mine has a speedster glass one). Mine car has never had wipers.
When I took it to the CHP for inspection - they just placed two VIN stickers on the car and that was it - they checked nothing about the car. DMV just checked paperwork and collected $$. BAR just determined it was a gross polluter and gave me my smog free sticker.
Mike |
| |
07-12-06, 05:55 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Mesa 3 Tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Santa Clara, Ca GT40: SLC 001
Posts: 394
Rep Power: 6  | Thanks guys,
Good info.
Mike has anyone documented their SB100 experience on this forum? Howard gave me what he could remember of his SB100 passage. I just want to make sure I don't make any misteps I can't 'take back' when I go through the process.
I have not done a search on it but I will later this evening.
TIA |
| |
07-12-06, 07:17 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | 5 Tenths 
Join Date: Feb 2004 GT40: So Cal
Posts: 546
Rep Power: 10  | I can document my experience - I have to delete the explicatives though. I did a write up on another site and will see if I can drag it across. All in all it was not bad - you just have to be patient.
I dragged my registration out over 10+ years and used temp operating permits to drive it during that time. Then SB100 came along and I took advantage of that. DMV was real nice about giving me temp operating permits for 4-6 months a whack as I was "building" and "testing" the car for years. As long as they got paid they seemed happy.
Mike
Last edited by SpyderMike; 07-12-06 at 07:20 PM.
|
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 AM.
|