MK-I MK-II MK-III MK-IV GULF MIRAGE J-CAR LOLA
| All GT40 GT40 and Ford GT Talk - All the time! |
18th March 2007, 06:50 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Tizzy 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
| GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron Please can you tell me if the GT40 can out perform the Veyron? |
| |
18th March 2007, 08:32 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | simonjrwinter I Have No Life 
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 2,835
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron Everything depends on the engine gearbox combo of course, but no matter what, I guess it would be pretty difficult to compete with a 1000bhp, 4 turbocharged, 4 wheel drive car.
__________________ Currently GT40-less |
| |
18th March 2007, 12:50 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Sandy Gulf GT40 
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Los Angeles, CA GT40: RCR GT40 Gulf
Posts: 1,230
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron It (GT40) looks better...
Sandy
__________________ RCR GT40 #11 348" Alloy SBF, 930 Box, Gulf 1075 Trim Now in the Garage, still under construction... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Links to the cars |
| |
18th March 2007, 12:59 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Gary Kadrmas 7 Tenths 
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Oregon, USA GT40: Not yet, but so
Posts: 711
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron Tizzy,
Welcome to the forum.
Horsepower to weight, and the ability to transfer the energy into motion.
Although the GT40 does a very fine job of it, modern technology is what it is. The performance of the Veyron is outstanding.
However, if you had a GT40 and parked it next to a Veyron, 98% of the people would not know what either car was, and the majority of the people would be attracted to the color of the car.
So when you get your GT40, make sure you get the correct color, and
never park it next to a Veyron.......and you will have a winner every time!
__________________ Gary Kadrmas
___________________
Owner of CSX-2075 for over 30 years, and wanting a GT40 for over 20 years:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: |
| |
18th March 2007, 01:02 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | chuck 1 8 Tenths 
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: greenville,SC GT40: CAV
Posts: 895
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron the answer to this question is no. It is much like the 427 cobra vrs. ZO6 debate |
| |
18th March 2007, 01:14 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Tizzy 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron Thank you very much indeed for these replies. I shall certainly endeavour not to park my GT40 (should I ever get one) next to the Veyron  In fact I've never seen the GT40 in the "flesh" but did encounter a Veyron in Salzburg last year.
Thanks again. |
| |
18th March 2007, 07:28 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Tizzy 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron Can I now ask what is the fastest speed that the GT40 has achieved (when and where)? Sorry to harp on. |
| |
18th March 2007, 08:06 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | kenshiro8 I Have No Life 
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Bolina ! GT40: multyhull CF
Posts: 2,924
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron Quote:
Originally Posted by Tizzy Thank you very much indeed for these replies. I shall certainly endeavour not to park my GT40 (should I ever get one) next to the Veyron  In fact I've never seen the GT40 in the "flesh" but did encounter a Veyron in Salzburg last year.
Thanks again. | Dave Champ and me,in his (now sold) wonderful GTD refuel in Le mans town exactly near to a brand new Veyron.
Think is enough to say u the test driver was simply falling in love looking "our" gt40,walinking around and smiling too much,in the only way a gt40 can make u have a "stupid" smile for over 10 minutes...
His offshore-veyron doesnt really feature anything so special as the geetee can have,and this also if the GTD costs only as veyron's braking system.
No history, no emotions, no dreams.
Its just a modern toy usually sold to arabics searching the inutile power of its inutile 1001 hp and his inutile 400 km/h top speed (to do somewhere in desert?..doh..).
No way neither to compare this new audi-bugatti to the old crazy italian Bugatti ( I am referring to bugatti owned by Romano Artioli...with EB110 serie).
The older one had a lot much more of the french-italian tradition than this new expensive inutile toy.
Inside le mans I also had the opportunity to see both running and....even more, no way.
The beauty and the magic of the racing 40s cant really be near to the veyron (when it try stop..it also uses airbrakes as airplanes  ...useful for something serious or just to show?doh again..  )
Think will be really better deal to buy a ferrari Enzo,cause its a ferrari, its italian..its red (and u save a lot of money for a truly better formula 1 tech winning car)
There is really no reason in this world neither to think a Veyron can beat a gt40.
No way..at least for me
__________________ Paolo,the italian :) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. google_ad_section_end --> |
| |
19th March 2007, 12:47 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | MikeDD Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: May 2002 GT40: DRB
Posts: 1,487
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron Tizzy
The MK II and MK IV GT40s were geared for 220 mph down the Mulsanne at Lemans. But I don't know if they ever reached that speed.
MikeD
__________________ DRB GT40 # 49
RCR Lola MK IIIb (for sale) |
| |
19th March 2007, 01:15 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | danimal 3 Tenths 
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Communist USA GT40: none yet... :(
Posts: 329
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron I believe in one thread about gearing in GT40s, Jim (J-6) said his gearbox was good for 223 at 6800...... |
| |
19th March 2007, 01:42 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Kalun_D 6 Tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Seattle GT40: Scratch build
Posts: 697
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron "out perform"
depends on your definition of performance. HP? or more importantly power to weight ratio? Top speed? 1/4 mile time? Price? Dollar per HP? or bang for buck? Looks? Popularity?
Veyron
1000 HP
250 mph top speed
0-60 2.4 secs
4150 lbs.
1.7 mil
Ford GT
550 HP
205 mph top speed
0-60 3.3 secs
3400 lbs
160 K
GT40 (replica)
450 HP avg.
160 mph ? top speed avg.
0-60 ??
2400 lbs avg.
60 K avg.
straight performance the Veyron wins although power to weight the numbers are closer with the replica moving into 2nd.
On a really tight track the replica might do better if it had an above average handling set up, due to the weight penalty of the Veyron.
looks is subjective although public popularity the Gt 40 probably comes out on top.
bang for the buck? No contest, the Veyron is left in the dust and the replica reigns supreme. After all what good is a dream if so few of us can make it real?
The original GT's were about 225 mph on the Mulsanne, but that was with the 427.
The Veyron will do 257 mph but is electronically limited to 253 mph because the tires will fail after 15 minutes at that speed. It really doesn't matter though because at 250 the fuel only lasts 12 minutes, which is 1.2 mpg.
Last edited by Kalun_D; 19th March 2007 at 02:07 PM.
|
| |
19th March 2007, 05:44 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | I Have No Life 
Join Date: Jun 2002 GT40: San Francisco Bay Area California USA
Posts: 2,997
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron GT40's get more chicks! How's that for performance? Honestly, when I have had my car parked near other modern supercars it always gets the most attention.
IF and thats a big IF you were to spend a equal amount of money and R&D on a Ford of modern design I am sure it would be equal to the test. It would however not be a GT40. |
| |
19th March 2007, 06:26 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | iank2112 10 tenths 
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: San Diego, CA GT40: none yet
Posts: 1,491
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron For kicks, these are the numbers I have found:
GT40 MkIB (Gulf)
425 HP
211 mph top speed
0-60 ??
2100 lbs
Ian
__________________ A few fries short of a Happy Meal |
| |
20th March 2007, 10:24 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | MK -IV J6 10 tenths 
Join Date: Mar 2002 GT40: NYC,USA
Posts: 1,921
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron The fastest confirmed speed I know of is J6's 223.
Having driven both I can tell you that a Veryon is on another planet and will leave a MK-IV far behind.
That said the electoronics needed to control the Veryon are IMO very intrusive and J6 AND P 4/5 are much more fun to drive. (P 4/5 will leave J6 far behind as well.) |
| |
20th March 2007, 07:33 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | kenshiro8 I Have No Life 
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Bolina ! GT40: multyhull CF
Posts: 2,924
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron  ..please Jim...dont buy a Veyron eh?..please nooooo
__________________ Paolo,the italian :) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. google_ad_section_end --> |
| |
20th March 2007, 10:56 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | MK -IV J6 10 tenths 
Join Date: Mar 2002 GT40: NYC,USA
Posts: 1,921
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron Quote:
Originally Posted by kenshiro8  ..please Jim...dont buy a Veyron eh?..please nooooo  | If I do and that's a big if I'm going to mod it a bit... |
| |
21st March 2007, 02:05 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Pete Lifetime Premier Supporter 
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Brisbane, Austr GT40: GT40 Australia.
Posts: 7,073
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron Quote:
Originally Posted by MK -IV J6 If I do and that's a big if I'm going to mod it a bit... | You are such a tease Jim
__________________ Cheers, Pete.
Queensland Australia.
The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it.
DRB #48 |
| |
21st March 2007, 03:17 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | ckouba 8 Tenths 
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Oregon, USA GT40: RCR40-31
Posts: 862
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron Quote:
Originally Posted by MK -IV J6 If I do and that's a big if I'm going to mod it a bit... | If it's anything like the way you "modded" that old Enzo, I for one can't wait to see the results!
__________________ Chris K
RCR40 #31 |
| |
21st March 2007, 06:14 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | roaldin 10 tenths 
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Australia GT40: RF
Posts: 1,122
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron Thankfully there are no roads in Tas' that the Veyron could be useful on so I won't be seeing one anytime soon. Good news because IMO they are one of the ugliest cars ever built.
Stupidly fast - that can be a good thing;
Stupidly powerful - see previous answer;
Stupidly expensive - well that limits it's market to two types of people, with (IMO) some degree of linkage;
Stupidly impractical - Not necessarily if you just tootle about but then why buy it (apart from the obvious Freudian reasons)? To use it in a way that would make say a Porsche Carrera GT inadequate would be stupid on anything but a very few roads, if any at all.
Stupidly ugly, the GT40 is light years ahead - and it was designed a generation ago...
I'm still betting a Veyron won't be all that quick (against other "supercars") around an average circuit. Perhaps that's why VW won't let one be driven by The Stig. A one trick pony?
Give me a car thats good (between 50 and 150 especially) through the twisties anyday as opposed to a lesser handling car with a top speed I can never use.
(All this said without the privilege of driving one - just articles read, drive tests watched, and plenty of conjecture)
Good on VW for doing it though!
Tim. (I'd still take the Carrera GT)
P.S. No I wouldn't, I'd take a good GT40 anyday. I don't even have to drive it to feel good. I feel good because it's beautiful and it's fun, not because it proves one a gazillionaire - big deal. Not directing this at Jim, but IMO it takes more than money and certainly more than celebrity to make someone rich.
P.P.S. I hope this doesn't affect my chances of seeing Jim's collection first hand one day... 
In return I promise I'll show him my collection of trail-bikes assuming he ever comes to Tassie...
P.P.P.S. I don't think I've ever edited a post so much...
Last edited by roaldin; 21st March 2007 at 06:34 AM.
|
| |
21st March 2007, 06:53 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | MK -IV J6 10 tenths 
Join Date: Mar 2002 GT40: NYC,USA
Posts: 1,921
| Re: GT40 versus Bugatti Veyron Quote:
Originally Posted by roaldin Thankfully there are no roads in Tas' that the Veyron could be useful on so I won't be seeing one anytime soon. Good news because IMO they are one of the ugliest cars ever built.
Stupidly fast - that can be a good thing;
Stupidly powerful - see previous answer;
Stupidly expensive - well that limits it's market to two types of people, with (IMO) some degree of linkage;
Stupidly impractical - Not necessarily if you just tootle about but then why buy it (apart from the obvious Freudian reasons)? To use it in a way that would make say a Porsche Carrera GT inadequate would be stupid on anything but a very few roads, if any at all.
Stupidly ugly, the GT40 is light years ahead - and it was designed a generation ago...
I'm still betting a Veyron won't be all that quick (against other "supercars") around an average circuit. Perhaps that's why VW won't let one be driven by The Stig. A one trick pony?
Give me a car thats good (between 50 and 150 especially) through the twisties anyday as opposed to a lesser handling car with a top speed I can never use.
(All this said without the privilege of driving one - just articles read, drive tests watched, and plenty of conjecture)
Good on VW for doing it though!
Tim. (I'd still take the Carrera GT)
P.S. No I wouldn't, I'd take a good GT40 anyday. I don't even have to drive it to feel good. I feel good because it's beautiful and it's fun, not because it proves one a gazillionaire - big deal. Not directing this at Jim, but IMO it takes more than money and certainly more than celebrity to make someone rich.
P.P.S. I hope this doesn't affect my chances of seeing Jim's collection first hand one day... 
In return I promise I'll show him my collection of trail-bikes assuming he ever comes to Tassie...
P.P.P.S. I don't think I've ever edited a post so much... | One thing you're leaving out is the brakes. The Veryons brakes would make it much faster around a track than an original GT 40.
All of you are quite welcome at any time and as an aside this spring when my 412P is going back together I'll have another get together.
Best |
| |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.gt40s.com/forum/all-gt40/21153-gt40-versus-bugatti-veyron.html | | Posted By | For | Type | Date | | GT40s.com | This thread | Refback | 18th March 2007 01:27 PM | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 AM.
|