MK-I MK-II MK-III MK-IV GULF MIRAGE J-CAR LOLA
| Notices | Hi member,
welcome to GT40s.com! If you've never posted on the forum maybe give it a go by introducing yourself in the Introduce Yourself Here forum. Also, think about becoming a Forum Supporter at GT40s.com. Becoming a supporter will allow you more PM space, an avatar, and the money is used to keep GT40s.com running.
Enjoy the forum!
Welcome to the GT40s.com, the World’s Largest GT40 resource.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, view pictures, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, Join Our Community Today!
Why not start with your first post today and become an active part of GT40s.com now! And, if you find you enjoy GT40s.com think about becoming a Forum Supporter. | | All GT40 All GT40 Replica Talk - All the time! |
12-22-01, 10:49 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | A Tenth 
Join Date: Oct 2001 GT40: Melbourne, not in the USA...
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 9  | Mirages Hi, does anybody have any data on the relative merits of the Mirage GT40's?
I understand 3 were built, one was crashed etc.
Was the new body more slippery?
(they seem to have been busy with spoilers and dive planes at that time as well)
And has anyone ever made a quality replica?
{I realise they look like a GT40 morphed into a Lola T-70 :-) }
Thanks
Rob [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img] |
| |
12-24-01, 08:09 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Fatal Attraction Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA GT40: Ex-DRB #35
Posts: 1,502
Rep Power: 23  | Re: Mirages Robert,
I read somewhere that they were hoping to
lose some weight as well as improve aerodynamics. It must not have had a positive
effect as they rebuilt one of the two
surviving Mirages back to a GT40(1074) The
cockpit of a Mirage must have been a little
tight, as they were still right hand drive,
not centerline like a MacLaren F1. Still,
it was a sharp looking car!
Bill |
| |
12-24-01, 12:59 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Geoff Deakin Rookie 
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Carlisle, Engla
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 7  | Re: Mirages As far as I know, the Mirages were an attempt by Ford Great Britain to develop the GT40 further.
The standard GT40 cockpit was considerably wider than the regulations allowed, causing excessive drag.
Len Bailey picked three tubs to modify. The most visible modification was the squaring off of the front of the monocoque, as distinct from the semi-circular cut out on the standard tub.
The front body panel was similar to the MkI GT40, although without the twin nostril radiator vent. Extra driving lights were fitted underneath the headlights, and small canard fins fitted just ahead of the front wheel arches.
The major difference in appearance was in the centre section and rear body cover, this being fitted with three NACA ducts.
The Cd was down to 0.33 from 0.35, and the weight reduced by 200lbs.
Regulations were changed for 1967 giving the Mirages only one season to prove their worth. Out of 14 race starts, they won 5 races! Pretty good with basically two chassis to work with.
At the end of the season, it was thought that chassis M1002 was converted to the great GT40/1075, and M1003 to GT40/1074.
A brief but very successful career.
Finally, may I wish all GT40 fans a Very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
Long may the Forum flourish - It is a wonderful source of inspiration.
[img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img] |
| |
01-05-02, 03:09 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | A Tenth 
Join Date: Oct 2001 GT40: Melbourne, not in the USA...
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 9  | Re: Mirages I wonder if any body moulds exist for the Mirage?
Or if anybody had made a decent replica??
Rob [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img] |
| |
01-06-02, 03:51 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | A Tenth 
Join Date: Oct 2001 GT40: Melbourne, not in the USA...
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 9  | Re: Mirages Re: Mirage aerodynamics..
Measurement of photos of the GT40's seem to show a reduction in frontal area of something very close to 0.5 sq ft...combining that with a reduction in drag coefficient from 0.35 to 0.32, would place the drag figure at approx 89% of the "1075" body...almost precisely that of the standard width car!!
Rob |
| |
01-06-02, 10:21 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | 2 Tenths 
Join Date: Sep 2001 GT40: Clearville, PA
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 10  | Re: Mirages I have a RealPlayer video clip that looks at chassis 1076 as raced in 1968. The clip calls the car a "redeveloped and refined" MkI. It was build by JW Engineering and called a MkIB. It says that along with the widened fenders, the MKIB had a much narrower roofline than the MKI. Interesting... |
| |
01-07-02, 12:49 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| 
Join Date: Dec 2001 GT40: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7  | Re: Mirages Can you post or send that video clip? It sounds neat. |
| |
01-07-02, 06:17 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| 
Join Date: Jan 2002 GT40: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7  | Re: Mirages Hi guys, sorry for asking the question , but why were they converted ? If they had better aerodynamics(better fuel mileage and top speed, 2 great advantages on a 24 hr race) would it made more sense to run them with the engines in 1074/75 ?
[ January 07, 2002: Message edited by: FIA289 ] |
| |
01-07-02, 06:48 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | A Tenth 
Join Date: Dec 2001 GT40: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 8  | Re: Mirages Most likely because the Mirages were never homologated (only built 3, needed to sell 50) while the MK I's were and so could compete in the production classes after the rules change in '68. Just my guess. Maybe someone else has more info.
[ January 07, 2002: Message edited by: Orin Meyer ] |
| |
01-07-02, 10:47 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | A Tenth 
Join Date: Oct 2001 GT40: Melbourne, not in the USA...
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 9  | Re: Mirages I believe that the Mirages were 5 litre V8's??
The "200" lb reduction: was that from the 1075 7 litre spec, or the much lighter small block, I wonder?
Gt40 history gurus may know this one off the top of their heads :P
Rob [img]images/icons/shocked.gif[/img] |
| |
01-07-02, 11:39 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | 2 Tenths 
Join Date: Sep 2001 GT40: Clearville, PA
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 10  | Re: Mirages The RealPlayer file I have of 1076 is 2.7 megs, about 10 minutes long. If anyone has a place to place to post it, leave me know your email address and I'll send it. I only have a 28.8 connection, so it makes it difficult to email too many times.
my email is dwharran@pennswoods.net
According to the video, 1076 was 4.9 liters, about 400 HP with Gruney/Westlake heads. |
| |
01-08-02, 04:17 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0  | Re: Mirages There is an excellent chapter on the Mirages in Ronnie Spain's book. The cars were Len Bailey designed and built at JWA in Slough, England. Basically, the Mirages were constructed as lightweight racers (lighter chassis, body and suspension) and competed in Group 4 and Group 6 with, variously, 305 and 351 engines. The peculiar thing is that, because of the name, Ford was unable to claim any of the championship points the cars won. A change in rules for the prototype category for 1968 effectively made the Mirages obsolete but two of them were rebuilt as 1074 and 1075, each with the lightweight Mirage chassis and new lightweight roof structures and carbon fibre reinforced lightweight front and rear ends. The rest is history, 1075 being the only car to win Le Mans twice...
Cheers, Brian. |
| |
01-08-02, 05:03 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0  | Re: Mirages any pictures of the mirages?
luis |
| |
01-08-02, 07:21 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Fatal Attraction Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA GT40: Ex-DRB #35
Posts: 1,502
Rep Power: 23  | Re: Mirages Luis,
There are a few Mirage photos at: www.gt40.org.uk.
Bill |
| |
01-08-02, 08:03 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | 3 Tenths 
Join Date: Sep 2001 GT40: australia
Posts: 333
Rep Power: 11  | Re: Mirages brian . i am pretty certain 1075 was not a rebuilt mirage but i think that a lot of the trick bits from the mirage programme were incorporated in it regards norman |
| |
01-09-02, 08:14 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | 3 Tenths 
Join Date: Sep 2001 GT40: australia
Posts: 333
Rep Power: 11  | Re: Mirages brian woooops i think i'm wrong on 1075 it appears now i'm home that you are right . i knew there were three mirages . one still exists , one i though to have been written off and one became 1074. but the one written off became 1074 and the remaining one became 1075. i hope that makes sense but it's getting pretty late here so i best go to bed regards norman |
| |
01-18-02, 08:43 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | 10 tenths 
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: UK GT40: England Suffolk
Posts: 1,694
Rep Power: 24  | Re: Mirages |
| |
01-18-02, 08:55 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Fatal Attraction Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA GT40: Ex-DRB #35
Posts: 1,502
Rep Power: 23  | Re: Mirages Chris,
Is that the genuine article?
If so, I'd be scared to see the sticker
price on it! Where is the car? Who is the
lucky owner? etc., etc., etc.
Great photo by the way!
Bill
[img]images/icons/cool.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/cool.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/cool.gif[/img] |
| |
01-18-02, 09:22 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | 10 tenths 
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: UK GT40: England Suffolk
Posts: 1,694
Rep Power: 24  | Re: Mirages This car is M.10001 it was owned by Bill Kontes Chekered Flag in Vineland, New Jersey in 1984 then it was restored by
Glenn Roberts in 1986. Who owns this car now I don't, know but as the only Mirage in the world poss over $1,000000 |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.
|