MK-I MK-II MK-III MK-IV GULF MIRAGE J-CAR LOLA
| Notices | Hi member,
welcome to GT40s.com! If you've never posted on the forum maybe give it a go by introducing yourself in the Introduce Yourself Here forum. Also, think about becoming a Forum Supporter at GT40s.com. Becoming a supporter will allow you more PM space, an avatar, and the money is used to keep GT40s.com running.
Enjoy the forum!
Welcome to the GT40s.com, the World’s Largest GT40 resource.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, view pictures, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, Join Our Community Today!
Why not start with your first post today and become an active part of GT40s.com now! And, if you find you enjoy GT40s.com think about becoming a Forum Supporter. | | GT40 Tech - Chassis,Brakes,Tires,&Wheels Chassis and Handling. |
11-20-04, 04:37 AM
|
#21 (permalink)
| | wolodymyr Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Scotland GT40: DAX40
Posts: 474
Rep Power: 9  | Re: GTD brakes? Howard, heres a picture which gives a better idea of location. The support rails are pieces of angle slotted to allow fore and aft adjustment, you can just see one of the slots near the bottom left. |
| |
11-20-04, 04:57 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
| | 10 tenths 
Join Date: Jun 2002 GT40: San Francisco Bay Area California USA
Posts: 1,913
Rep Power: 26  | Re: GTD brakes? Your GTD is a lot different than my GTD. I think I could use a drop down peddle box though. Thanks for the pictures. |
| |
11-20-04, 06:32 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
| | wolodymyr Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Scotland GT40: DAX40
Posts: 474
Rep Power: 9  | Re: GTD brakes? Sorry Howard, I should keep saying, it's a DAX, but I think it uses the GTD suspension and other bits and pieces. |
| |
11-22-04, 06:07 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
| | hoverducky Rookie 
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Oakland, CA GT40: Gt40 Replication, Ltd. (NZ)
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 8  | Re: GTD brakes? Be advised that using a hanging mount pedal assembly may be harder with LHD than RHD due to the relative placement of the pedals and the steering column. I am having to go with a floor mount setup because the column interferes with a hanging clutch pedal.
Scott |
| |
11-23-04, 06:06 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
| | Rookie 
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Being working sportscar since 1970, and building guitars since 1960. GT40: Stockholm Sweden
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 5  | Re: GTD brakes? Michael
I usually calculate with a factor of 0,25 to get an idea of the ratio needed for a manual brake system. If the car weights 1000 kg which shold be close to your car, then 1000 *0,25=250. The total ratio from the pedal to disc pad should then be 250:1.
If the pedal arm is 300mm long and the master rod is located 60 mm from the bearing end the pedal ratio become 5:1. Then the total ratio should be devided by this, so 250/5=50. The hydraulic ratio should then be 50:1 between the master cylinder and caliper piston area.
If the maste cylinder happen to be two 3/4" then the area become 570mm2. 570*50=makes for a total caliper area of 28500mm2.
This math is to calculate for a reasonable pedal effort, and a real race car may go a lot heavier. But even this "softer" ratio may feel a little hard for an "regular" sunday driver.
Then we must calculate for the brake balance front to rear of the car. If you want me to show this math, let me know.
Goran Malmberg |
| |
11-24-04, 02:23 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
| | Rookie 
Join Date: Oct 2003 GT40: Denmark
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 6  | Re: GTD brakes? Goran
Thanks for the calculations.I would be nice also to know how to do the ratio front rear calculations.All I know at the moment is that I am using the gtd setup with granda front(vented) and scorpio rear(solid).gtd mastercylinder without boosters.I dont have the measurement for my pedal setup with me.
brgds
Michael [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
| |
11-24-04, 09:17 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
| | Rookie 
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Being working sportscar since 1970, and building guitars since 1960. GT40: Stockholm Sweden
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 5  | Re: GTD brakes? Brake bias is a bit tricky to calculate properly as we have to make estimations like where the CGH is located, in order to predict braking weight transfer.
Lets say that the car has a static 60-40% distribution rear to front. But under full brake of 1g, there is a 45-55%. If racing tires is used there might be 40-60% situation. The caliper piston should have about the same distribution as this dynamic wheight placed on the tires under braking. But even tire size has an influence as the more heavely loaded front tires is loosing friction of coefficient. And moost of us probaly has bigger rear tires. But as we want the front tires to lock up first theis is sort of even things out.
The masses of the disc should also match the dynamic condition which means that the front discs should have say 55-60% of the iron.
Even the pad area should match this size of load, nothing said here WHAT pad area should be used, just the size distribution.
Goran Malmberg |
| |
11-24-04, 12:34 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
| | Rookie 
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Being working sportscar since 1970, and building guitars since 1960. GT40: Stockholm Sweden
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 5  | Re: GTD brakes? If we have 28500mm2 in total piston area, 55%from it makes 15650mm2 up front and 45% 12850mm2 at the rear.If we presume 2 x 4 piston calipers we have 8 pistons at 1956mm2 each front and 1606mm2 rears. This makes 1,78 pistons rear and 1,96 front. Lets make it 1,3/4 and 2 inch. But we may use 5/8 master and size down in caliper pistons accordingly.
We should not use more iron in the disc than nessesary as the unsprung weight is getting high then. It is better to fabricate a proper disc cooling system. Pad size is very much given by the selected piston area. Therfore a suitable pad material should be selected for proper pad temperature.
Exept for temperature there is no difference in braking power with different pad area.
If a stiffer rollbar is mounted on the front axle, this axle is transfering a larger amount of the total weight transfer. Making a big difference between the left and right tire. This makes the car to understeer, or getting less grip. The same goes for the whole car when it comes to braking. The weight is just moving along the car in place of sideways.But here BOTH sides transfer the same amount of weght over to the front axle. Making a big difference between the front and rear axle, making the whole car to loose grip. We can NEVER brake harder than the grip of the tires. Therfor we should pay great attentione to brake bias, car balancne and proper tire size and wheel alingment.
The last lines was maybe a little of topic, hope you dont mind.
Regards
Goran Malmberg |
| |
11-24-04, 08:52 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
| | CCX33911 10 tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2001 GT40: Virginia
Posts: 1,222
Rep Power: 19  | Re: GTD brakes? I have mentioned this before. For those of you who have access to Matlab or want to port my code over to Octave I can let you have a program that calculates all you want to know relative to braking. You just need to have all of the input dimensions, etc. and can play around with brake force and piston size, etc. |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 AM.
|