MK-I MK-II MK-III MK-IV GULF MIRAGE J-CAR LOLA
| Notices | Hi member,
welcome to GT40s.com! If you've never posted on the forum maybe give it a go by introducing yourself in the Introduce Yourself Here forum. Also, think about becoming a Forum Supporter at GT40s.com. Becoming a supporter will allow you more PM space, an avatar, and the money is used to keep GT40s.com running.
Enjoy the forum!
Welcome to the GT40s.com, the World’s Largest GT40 resource.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, view pictures, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, Join Our Community Today!
Why not start with your first post today and become an active part of GT40s.com now! And, if you find you enjoy GT40s.com think about becoming a Forum Supporter. | | GT40 Tech - Engines/Induction/Exhaust Motors and engine related - right here! |
06-06-04, 11:12 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | swede30 Jim Dewar 
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: NC USA GT40: RF 103
Posts: 172
Rep Power: 6  | 95 Mustang 302 oil pan Would anyone give advise about oil pan selection on this model.
If possible I would like to move the sump forward, replacing the pump and pickup with a canton style road racing setup.
I cannot find information about converting this 5.0l Mustang pan to the perfered set up.
Any advice would be helpful.
Regards, Jim |
| |
06-07-04, 10:47 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Neal 8 Tenths 
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Seattle, WA, US GT40: GT40 NZ
Posts: 858
Rep Power: 16  | Re: 95 Mustang 302 oil pan You may use the earlier style front sump road race pans like the Canton or Milodon units. They typically do not have the dipstick boss on the correct side of the pan. You may look for a pan with a dipstick in the pan. Gordon Levy at Levy racing in AZ makes a nice pan that would work. The pickup and windage tray should fit fine without modification.
Note the pan clearance but no dipstick boss on the block. |
| |
06-07-04, 11:24 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | swede30 Jim Dewar 
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: NC USA GT40: RF 103
Posts: 172
Rep Power: 6  | Re: 95 Mustang 302 oil pan Hello Neal, thanks for your reply.
Which pan are you using?
The dipstick hole is in the block on the left side. How would you block this hole?
Jim [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
| |
06-07-04, 12:18 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Mark Worthington 10 tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2001 GT40: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,790
Rep Power: 24  | Re: 95 Mustang 302 oil pan I ordered the 405 race pan in aluminum from Armandos. I had an original-style Aviaid aluminum pan but sold it because it didn't work on my RF because there is a chassis cross member in the engine bay that necessitated a shorter (front-to-rear) sump. I would also recommend the blue silicone Felpro one-piece oil-pan gasket. It should be installed dry with no gasket sealant and can be reused if necessary. A real nice piece. |
| |
06-07-04, 01:26 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | swede30 Jim Dewar 
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: NC USA GT40: RF 103
Posts: 172
Rep Power: 6  | Re: 95 Mustang 302 oil pan Thanks Mark,
Does this mean you must have a custom oil pan to fit an RF car or is there a unit off the shelf you can purchase?
I would be satistied with a steel pan if one is available to fit an RF without custom fabrication expense.
Regards, Jim |
| |
06-07-04, 01:54 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Mark Worthington 10 tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2001 GT40: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,790
Rep Power: 24  | Re: 95 Mustang 302 oil pan The RF chassis will accept front-sump pans with sump length up to about 10-1/2 inches. The Armando's 405 pan is 10" long by 7.5" deep by 11.5" wide, and is fully baffled. In my opinion it's the best wet-sump pan you can buy. I don't know what dimensions are available for other pans (e.g., Canton, Moroso, etc.). I've heard stories, from a number of sources, of the Canton pans developing fatigue cracks along the baffle welds. Armando's has the 405 pan in stock (in steel), and the steel version costs about $120 less than the aluminum version. |
| |
06-07-04, 02:33 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | swede30 Jim Dewar 
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: NC USA GT40: RF 103
Posts: 172
Rep Power: 6  | Re: 95 Mustang 302 oil pan Thanks again Mark,
I found Arnando's web site and I'm on my way.
Thanks to everyone for helping.
Jim |
| |
06-07-04, 04:58 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Ron Earp Retiree 
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: NC, USA
Posts: 4,009
Rep Power: 58  | Re: 95 Mustang 302 oil pan I've used a lot of Canton pans with no problems whatsoever.
In my RF, I'm using the Canton front sump pan with kickouts and trapdoor baffle system. Fits the car like a glove, good pans in my opinion and not overpriced like a lot of the others. There are other threads on pans on the site. |
| |
06-07-04, 08:50 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Neal 8 Tenths 
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Seattle, WA, US GT40: GT40 NZ
Posts: 858
Rep Power: 16  | Re: 95 Mustang 302 oil pan Milodon P/N 31600 |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 PM.
|