MK-I MK-II MK-III MK-IV GULF MIRAGE J-CAR LOLA
| Notices | Hi member,
welcome to GT40s.com! If you've never posted on the forum maybe give it a go by introducing yourself in the Introduce Yourself Here forum. Also, think about becoming a Forum Supporter at GT40s.com. Becoming a supporter will allow you more PM space, an avatar, and the money is used to keep GT40s.com running.
Enjoy the forum!
Welcome to the GT40s.com, the World’s Largest GT40 resource.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, view pictures, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, Join Our Community Today!
Why not start with your first post today and become an active part of GT40s.com now! And, if you find you enjoy GT40s.com think about becoming a Forum Supporter. | | GT40 Tech - Engines/Induction/Exhaust Motors and engine related - right here! |
10-14-04, 11:20 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | llarsen Admin 
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Raleigh, NC GT40: Sabre
Posts: 2,074
Rep Power: 29   | Roush 402IR Want 500HP with stack EFI? Check this out Roush 402IR
Lynn
with thanks to the guys at Club Cobra |
| |
10-15-04, 06:31 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | simonjrwinter 10 tenths 
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Essex, UK GT40: GTD
Posts: 1,867
Rep Power: 25  | Re: Roush 402IR or Ford racing crate motor? Looks very nice, how would it compare with these? http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts...tKeyField=6188
I would guess there may be some Ford employees here who may just be able to get a company discount on them? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
| |
10-15-04, 06:46 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Fatal Attraction Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA GT40: Ex-DRB #35
Posts: 1,501
Rep Power: 23  | Re: Roush 402IR or Ford racing crate motor? Simon,
I think that most guys would prefer to use a small block engine, to avoid the inherent "complications" of a big block(no A/C, WAAAY tight fit, chassis mods,weight,etc,etc,etc.)
It seems like a pretty good price for a pile of HP though! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Bill |
| |
10-15-04, 10:21 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | llarsen Admin 
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Raleigh, NC GT40: Sabre
Posts: 2,074
Rep Power: 29   | Re: Roush 402IR or Ford racing crate motor? Simon,
I agree with Bills comments. Part of the etc, etc is the very real issue of what transaxle to use. Unless you have VERY deep pockets, any solution that you come up with is going to be a kludge at best. Put another way, IMHO, there is not a readily available, affordably priced transaxle suitable for use with an FE of any stature. I would even go so far as dropping the "affordably priced" qualifier out of that statement.
Regards,
Lynn |
| |
10-15-04, 10:47 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | simonjrwinter 10 tenths 
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Essex, UK GT40: GTD
Posts: 1,867
Rep Power: 25  | Re: Roush 402IR or Ford racing crate motor? Sorry guys, I didn't really mean it as an engine for a '40, just got carried away with all that BHP for the money.
However it really would be good fun in a Cobra ! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] |
| |
10-15-04, 12:09 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | 10 tenths 
Join Date: Jun 2002 GT40: San Francisco Bay Area California USA
Posts: 1,920
Rep Power: 26  | Re: Roush 402IR or Ford racing crate motor? This engine is 351 winsor based and not a FE. I agree that there is no need to use a FE type motor when you can use a big 351W instead.
Most of the head and valve train development done on winsors comes from NASCAR and drag racing 5.0 classes. The trend towards big CI 351's has come from Ford Mustang street rodders and the need for big HP numbers. Large CI 351W based motors with low compression, because of low octain gas, that will still fit into a 5.0 mustang engine bays have been the result.
500fp of torque is a lot. "IF" and I mean IF in capitals letters, you have tires with enough grip to handle that much torque the gearbox required will surely cost more than a 500hp motor will.
If I was going to do a new drivetrain I would begin with a Porshe box with LSD,50/50 or whatever is the best one as far as power cap. is concerned. Then a big 351W at about 450hp built on a Alum. block, heads and one big 4 barrel.
Get the overall weight down to 2300 pounds and watch just about everything go backwards in the rearview mirror.
Hummmmmm sounds like Rick's car. |
| |
10-15-04, 12:57 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | aladinsane Lifetime Premier Supporter 
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: So Cal, USA GT40: Tornado
Posts: 759
Rep Power: 14   | Re: Roush 402IR or Ford racing crate motor? [ QUOTE ]
Hummmmmm sounds like Rick's car.
[/ QUOTE ]
Amen [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] |
| |
10-15-04, 01:35 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | 4 Tenths 
Join Date: Jan 2002 GT40: Gibraltar
Posts: 401
Rep Power: 11  | Re: Roush 402IR or Ford racing crate motor? Will a ZF will handle that amount of torque? |
| |
10-15-04, 02:02 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Fatal Attraction Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA GT40: Ex-DRB #35
Posts: 1,501
Rep Power: 23  | Re: Roush 402IR or Ford racing crate motor? Howard,
The Roush engine is a Windsor, the Ford Racing is a big block. According to the part #s, it is either a 429 or 460 block, bored and stroked. That's (the BB) what Lynn and I were referring to with regard to installation difficulty/cost.
Simon,
It would make a hell of a Cobra engine, wouldn't it? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Bill |
| |
10-15-04, 03:31 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | llarsen Admin 
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Raleigh, NC GT40: Sabre
Posts: 2,074
Rep Power: 29   | Re: Roush 402IR or Ford racing crate motor? Martin,
I believe it has, but if you go by the "official" specs, it is marginal at best (and that is being generous.) The Pantera guys have put quite a few outrageous motors in front of them, but there are some techniques that should be employed to help the ZF out. That said, I think that one could get a ZF variant from RBT that one could be very comfortable with. These were the first transaxles used in the new Ford GT with 500fp. They have since been replaced, but I believe this was because of production volume concerns and not the quality of the units. I don't know if the Ricardo that replaced it is a viable alternative: I have no clue what its dimensions are. The GrandAm Daytona Prototypes are running Trax and Enco transaxles that are huge and would never fit in a GT40; otherwise this might have been a way to go.
I would lean towards Howard's recommendations myself. To my knowledge a G50/50 or beefed up G50/xx probably provides the most capability/$. I think the only things that should be considered at these power levels are a billet side cover and aux. oiling of the diff, at least, if not all of the gear sets. Beefier shift forks is another common mod that is done, but this isn't really associated with the amount of torque the unit is handling.
Regards,
Lynn |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 PM.
|