GT40s.com
MK-I  MK-II  MK-III  MK-IV  GULF  MIRAGE  J-CAR  LOLA
GT40s.com
Home Forum Gallery Member Rides Support GT40s.com  
Register FAQ Members List Advertisers Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   GT40s.com > GT40 Technical Forums > GT40 Tech - Engines/Induction/Exhaust

Notices

GT40 Tech - Engines/Induction/Exhaust Motors and engine related - right here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-06, 09:57 AM   #1 (permalink)
simonjrwinter's Avatar
simonjrwinter
10 tenths
United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Essex, UK
GT40: GTD
Posts: 1,900
Rep Power: 26 simonjrwinter is just really nice
289 - 302 crank

Are they the same? interchangeable?
Thanks
Simon
simonjrwinter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-06, 11:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
llarsen's Avatar
llarsen
Admin
United States
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
GT40: Sabre
Posts: 2,074
Rep Power: 29 llarsen has much to be proud ofllarsen has much to be proud of
Re: 289 - 302 crank

Simon,

If I am not mistaken, the 289 crank had just a hair less stroke than the 3" stroke of the 302. As to other differences─ journal (both rod & main) widths and diameters, one/two piece main seals, thrust bearing location, etc. ─ I couldn't say, but I am sure someone will fill in the blanks.

Lynn
__________________
Sabre GT40/5L EFI/G50/50
Always verify parts or products discussed for your own use.
llarsen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-06, 11:29 AM   #3 (permalink)
car guy's Avatar
car guy
A Tenth
United States
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
GT40: Bailey Edwards
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 5 car guy is on a distinguished road
Re: 289 - 302 crank

My understanding is that the only difference between a 289 and a 302 is the crank (302 has a longer stroke). I have a 289 with a 302 crank in it.
car guy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-06, 01:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
Jim
coupe3w's Avatar
coupe3w
Rookie
United States
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woburn,Massachusetts USA
GT40: Looking
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 3 coupe3w is on a distinguished road
Re: 289 - 302 crank

Quote:
Originally Posted by simonjrwinter
Are they the same? interchangeable?
Thanks
Simon
The 289 had a stroke of 2.87 vs 3.00 for the 302. The cranks will interchange. The 289 block has a shoter cylinder and with the 302 crank installed you could get some rocking of the piston at BDC or break the skirt of the piston. The very early 302 blocks also had this problem (1968) but was fixed later on in 1968 production. The rear main seal will not be a problem as long as it is a 2 piece seal crank. I don't believe you can use the 5.0 crank in the 289/302 block due to the 1 piece seal of the 5.0 crank. I hope this helps.
coupe3w is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-06, 06:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
nanard289's Avatar
nanard289
Rookie
France
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: France
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 3 nanard289 will become famous soon enough
Re: 289 - 302 crank

Jim is right, both cranks can be installed on a 289 block. However, there is 2 kind of 302 cranks. The early heavy (until 1981 I believe) that are 28OZ externally balanced (like the 289) and the last (1982 and after) that are 50OZ externally balanced (they are lighter). It means that if you keep your 289 flywheel and damper, you have to select a 302 crank prior 1982 that is 28OZ balanced
nanard289 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-06, 07:24 PM   #6 (permalink)
toy264's Avatar
toy264
Moderator
United States
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 270
Rep Power: 6 toy264 will become famous soon enough
Re: 289 - 302 crank

The 302 Boss is the better 302 crank, being forged steel vs cast for the 302-4V. The 1969 unit was cross-drilled and the 1970 wasn’t. They are, however, expensive and hard to come by.
I believe the harmonic balancers are different between the 302&289: C8AZ-6316-A on the 302-4V, C9ZZ-6316-B on the 302 Boss, and C5AZ-6316-A on the 289. The 289K (HP) had two different balancers: pre 8-20-64 C3OZ, and C5OZ after that date, but whether they interchange, I don’t know.
If you put a 302 crank in your 289 block, be sure you also use both 302 rods and pistons to keep the 0.015" deck height clearance the same. Best OEM choice would be 302 Boss rods C9ZE-6200 B, D, or F. They are forged steel, spot faced vs broached, and use 3/8" vs 5/16" bolts.

This is what happens when you ask what time it is around here. Somebody like me tells you how to build a watch!
toy264 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
289 Hi-Po w/heads Value? b6gt40 GT40 Tech - Engines/Induction/Exhaust 12 04-11-07 08:53 AM
New Boss 302 crate engine and block Mark Worthington GT40 Tech - Engines/Induction/Exhaust 6 11-09-06 03:47 PM
looking for 1965 - 289 block & crank daveharris GT40 Wanted - Parts or Services Needed 7 04-05-06 09:52 PM
289 or 302 rsinor GT40 Tech - Engines/Induction/Exhaust 6 04-29-05 09:15 AM
Next problem: a 289, 302, 351, or 427? Sebring GT GT40 Tech - Engines/Induction/Exhaust 13 10-17-02 11:38 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 AM.