GT40s.com
MK-I  MK-II  MK-III  MK-IV  GULF  MIRAGE  J-CAR  LOLA
GT40s.com
Home Forum Gallery Member Rides Support GT40s.com  
Register FAQ Members List Advertisers Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   GT40s.com > GT40 Technical Forums > GT40 Tech - Engines/Induction/Exhaust

Notices

GT40 Tech - Engines/Induction/Exhaust Motors and engine related - right here!

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-19-07, 03:31 PM   1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)
bune's Avatar
bune
Bronze Supporter
Norway
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Norway
GT40: monocoque gt40
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 4 bune is on a distinguished road
Question Engine ID

I am close to buy a engine a 1966 Ford 289hp engine , but not quite sure if I'm getting the right stuff (to far away to travel for a look). First info is engine(block) number C8OE-6015A
The people will take of the oilpan and send me pictures from this, how do I find out that it is a 289hp ?? How can I see this from pictures or from numbers?
Regards Rune
bune is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 03:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
ahirsbrunner's Avatar
ahirsbrunner
Administrator
United States
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago, IL USA
GT40: RCR-40 #24
Posts: 478
Rep Power: 8 ahirsbrunner has disabled reputation
Re: Engine ID

Hi Bune,

I believe that C8OE-6015A is a 67/68 302 block. I'm sure there are more knowledgeable folks that can comment further...

Regards,

Al
ahirsbrunner is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 04:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
jac mac's Avatar
jac mac
10 tenths
New Zealand
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Gore N.Z.
Posts: 1,432
Rep Power: 19 jac mac has much to be proud ofjac mac has much to be proud of
Smile Re: Engine ID

Last year of production for 289 Hi Po was 1967. Ordinary 289 stopped in 1968. Since this block is C80E--- ( 1968 ) I do not like your chances. However if they will pull the pan/sump and send you photos there are 3 obvious points;
There should be a thin counterweight sandwiched between crank timing sprocket & front main (approx 4mm thick).
The main brg caps should be fully machined on front & rear faces.( no cast reliefs).
The connecting rod bolts should require a 9/16" spanner to remove the nut's.

The possibility exists that it could be a re-blocked 289 Hi Po so the easiest way to ID heads is look for screw in rocker studs along with raised casting around valve spring pockets.

Jac Mac
jac mac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 04:12 PM   #4 (permalink)
YerDugliness
Lifetime Premier Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: near Houston TX
GT40: Yellow Wix MKII
Posts: 534
Rep Power: 8 YerDugliness will become famous soon enough
Re: Engine ID

Quote:
Originally Posted by jac mac View Post
There should be a thin counterweight sandwiched between crank timing sprocket & front main (approx 4mm thick). Jac Mac
Just curious, Jac, as to the function of this thin counterweight. Did the 271 hp 289 balance differently than the regular 289's? If so, did the 271hp 289 require a different flywheel?

Thanks! I drove a '64 Fairlane with a 271hp 289/4 speed and that is what started my love affair with the high-winding SBF--love the sound of those solid lifters and didn't mind the tinkering necessary to keep them lashed. How I wish someone would recognize the classic lines of that Fairlane and start making a kit.

Doug
__________________
YD,E./PNB

Retired and attempting to age disgracefully
YerDugliness is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 04:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
bune's Avatar
bune
Bronze Supporter
Norway
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Norway
GT40: monocoque gt40
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 4 bune is on a distinguished road
Re: Engine ID

Just got these pictures, but they do not tell me what engine, I'm very glad that You can supply me with help here
Rune
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2 002.jpg (48.7 KB, 121 views)
File Type: jpg 2 003.jpg (49.6 KB, 127 views)
bune is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 05:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
jac mac's Avatar
jac mac
10 tenths
New Zealand
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Gore N.Z.
Posts: 1,432
Rep Power: 19 jac mac has much to be proud ofjac mac has much to be proud of
Re: Engine ID

It would appear that they are 289 heads ( the only clue is the exposed thread area on the heads for the 4 corner bolts of the intake manifold-- on later 302 heads these are enclosed by the head casting ) and the narrow width of the outer damper ring also points to a standard 289/302 crankshaft etc. Looks like the heads may have some porting work done and the fact that rocker covers have been extended to clear either roller rockers or stud girdle suggests that there may be some good bits inside.

Ask them to remove a rocker cover and take a close up shot of the valve spring pocket etc and into the ex port , along with any casting numbers . Of course if they are up with the play the price may change if they know what to look for.

Jac Mac
jac mac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 05:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
jac mac's Avatar
jac mac
10 tenths
New Zealand
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Gore N.Z.
Posts: 1,432
Rep Power: 19 jac mac has much to be proud ofjac mac has much to be proud of
Smile Re: Engine ID

Sorry Doug did not see your post when I replied to Rune.

The connecting rods in the 289 Hi Po ( also Boss 302 ) were 60 grams heavier than the std rod. Damper was also specific to these motors. Not sure if flywheel was different or they were balanced as an assy since crank was also Hi-nodular cast item as well. By using the thin counterweight in that position the balance is closer to the area that requires its counterweight effect.

I agree, those 65's are one of quite a few old Fords I would like to have if it was not for the 'rust' factor. I call all that sort of car ' 50 ft ' types. They look great @ that distance, but the closer you get-----!

Jac Mac
jac mac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 06:29 PM   #8 (permalink)
llarsen's Avatar
llarsen
Admin
United States
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
GT40: Sabre
Posts: 2,070
Rep Power: 29 llarsen has much to be proud ofllarsen has much to be proud of
Re: Engine ID

I had a '65 Mustang with the Hi-Po 289 in it and I loved that car. It was one of three vehicles I wish I still had. The other two being a '63 Vette with the big valve 327 and my '53 Pan Head Harley.

Oh well..............

Lynn
__________________
Sabre GT40/5L EFI/G50/50
Always verify parts or products discussed for your own use.
llarsen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 07:59 PM   #9 (permalink)
MikeP's Avatar
MikeP
2 Tenths
United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oldham England
GT40: GTD + GTD
Posts: 217
Rep Power: 5 MikeP is on a distinguished road
Re: Engine ID

According to the George Reid book the block number indicates that the block is 1968 (C is 60's and 8 for year) The O indicates that the block is from a Fairlane or Torino. the 6015 indicates that this is a block! I guess you knew that! The A indicates that this is an original type of part with no revisions. All Boss engine blocks have both four bolt main caps and screw in core plugs. Hope this helps.
Mike
MikeP is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-07, 09:31 PM   #10 (permalink)
YerDugliness
Lifetime Premier Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: near Houston TX
GT40: Yellow Wix MKII
Posts: 534
Rep Power: 8 YerDugliness will become famous soon enough
Re: Engine ID

Quote:
Originally Posted by jac mac View Post
I call all that sort of car ' 50 ft ' types. They look great @ that distance, but the closer you get-----!

Jac Mac
I call 'em 50-50 cars. They look pretty good going by at 50 MPH and 50 feet, but the closer you get-----!

Thanks for the great explanation on that crank. I knew about the nodular crank but had no idea about the counterweight, but I really like the idea of applying the balance in the critical area--maybe that was the reason those 289 hp's reved so nicely.

Cheers!

Doug
__________________
YD,E./PNB

Retired and attempting to age disgracefully
YerDugliness is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.gt40s.com/forum/gt40-tech-engines-induction-exhaust/21163-engine-id.html
Posted By For Type Date
GT40s.com This thread Refback 03-19-07 03:48 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 PM.