MK-I MK-II MK-III MK-IV GULF MIRAGE J-CAR LOLA
| Notices | Hi member,
welcome to GT40s.com! If you've never posted on the forum maybe give it a go by introducing yourself in the Introduce Yourself Here forum. Also, think about becoming a Forum Supporter at GT40s.com. Becoming a supporter will allow you more PM space, an avatar, and the money is used to keep GT40s.com running.
Enjoy the forum!
Welcome to the GT40s.com, the World’s Largest GT40 resource.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, view pictures, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, Join Our Community Today!
Why not start with your first post today and become an active part of GT40s.com now! And, if you find you enjoy GT40s.com think about becoming a Forum Supporter. | | GT40 Tech - Engines/Induction/Exhaust Motors and engine related - right here! |
02-29-08, 02:50 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
| | MikeP 2 Tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Oldham England GT40: GTD + GTD
Posts: 277
Rep Power: 6  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Maybe invest in a rev limiter. It won't protect against a wrong gear change or dropping a gear too soon but willl save a lead foot overrev.
I have been told that because most of these motors are externally balanced they can suffer crank whip at high revs (over 6,500rpm) which knocks out the centre main and tapers the end mains. Not sure if this happened in your case - is you rev counter accurate? However sorry to hear about your fun being spoiled - I hope there is not too much mashed. If you need it I have a spare standard crank you can have for nothing but I would guess you want a steel one now!
Cheers
Mike |
| |
02-29-08, 03:22 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
| | jac mac 10 tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Gore N.Z.
Posts: 1,761
Rep Power: 23   | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Extra oil feed line goes to gallery plug that is closest to main bearing bore at rear of block.
Also when having your crank assy balanced find a shop with a late model Sunnen DCB balancer or one of equivalent accuracy and ask around to ensure they have a good man operating it!
Jac Mac
Last edited by jac mac; 02-29-08 at 03:41 PM.
|
| |
02-29-08, 07:09 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
| | MikeP 2 Tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Oldham England GT40: GTD + GTD
Posts: 277
Rep Power: 6  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Another thought. If you are using an original GT40 style sump then there may be an issue with oil pick up. The genuine GT40 sumps are less deep than normal and if you use a standard oil pickup there may not be enough clearance for the oil to be picked up well and when you are reving the engine you may not get enough flow to the pump to feed the bearings. When you get the sump off check the gap between the oil pickup and the sump.
Cheers
Mike |
| |
03-01-08, 12:31 AM
|
#24 (permalink)
| | Gordon Levy Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Maricopa AZ
Posts: 332
Rep Power: 11  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? It is definately a bearing and definately oil related.
You stated that you went out at 40psi of oil pressure. I'm assuming the engine was not fully heated up. This is about 15psi to low for a wet sump track engine A safe rule is 20 psi hot at an idle and 5 psi added for every 1000 revs. 50 psi hot at higher revs is what I tend to look for.
You also stated that the pressure dropped the longer you were in the session. This is obvious oil temp issues. Do you have a cooler in the car? What was your oil temp doing? What type of oil where you using? Pulling the dip stick and smelling the oil, does it smell burnt?
Without a cooler of some sorts, running a 30 minute session and using off the shelf detergent oil can cause the bearings to self destruct. Most detergent oils loose their ability to oil properly at over 280 degrees. At 300-320 degrees it starts to remove babbet from the bearings.
The heat combined with the low pressure will tear the bottom end out of the engine.
You are definately needed a rebuild. Please take the extra precautions of setting up the engine correctly for track use if you plan on continuing to use the car this way.
This is opinion based on the limited information presented. |
| |
03-03-08, 04:14 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
| | wealdenengineer 10 tenths 
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: East Sussex, UK
Posts: 1,120
Rep Power: 0  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Talking of engine problems, how would you like this one ? |
| |
03-03-08, 07:26 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
| | Keith1 I Have No Life 
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: England GT40: Nein
Posts: 2,020
Rep Power: 27   | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Aluminium rod? 1/4 mile motor perhaps? ....
__________________ Yours Sincerely, Keith Hardy |
| |
03-03-08, 07:32 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
| | Gordon Levy Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Maricopa AZ
Posts: 332
Rep Power: 11  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Frank, that one looks like serious Detenation. The crank broke first and took the rod with it.
Drag race engine I'm assuming. |
| |
03-04-08, 05:43 AM
|
#28 (permalink)
| | p thompson Administrator 
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Milland, West S GT40: None
Posts: 2,262
| Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Frank - Was Stephanie at the wheel? - A lot lot braver than me!!
__________________ regards
Paul Thompson
-----------------------------------------
Too Many Hobbies  - Too Little Time |
| |
03-04-08, 06:09 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
| | Russ Noble Lifetime Premier Supporter 
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Christchurch,NZ GT40: Building scratc
Posts: 1,436
Rep Power: 21   | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon Levy Frank, that one looks like serious Detenation. The crank broke first and took the rod with it.
Drag race engine I'm assuming. | OK Gordon, I'm keen to learn. How did you diagnose detonation? |
| |
03-04-08, 12:05 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
| | Gordon Levy Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Maricopa AZ
Posts: 332
Rep Power: 11  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Russ, The way the crank it broken and the rod was pulled apart, not snapped.
It also could be from hydraulicing the engine. Both would cause a faily clean break like that. |
| |
03-04-08, 03:48 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
| | wealdenengineer 10 tenths 
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: East Sussex, UK
Posts: 1,120
Rep Power: 0  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Dodge Avenger methanol Funny Car 3000 hp Keith Black Chrysler Hemi, Santa Pod raceway, England. Driven by Stephanie Milam ( 50 year old housewife ) Engine grenaded at 203 mph and lifted the car 4 feet into the air. Steph kept it as straight as possible and did not destroy the car, but the bit of engine in the picture was one of the few larger pieces found. |
| |
03-04-08, 04:28 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
| | speed220mph A Tenth 
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: North Carolina GT40: ERA GT
Posts: 182
Rep Power: 7  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Julian: The knock you heard was probably the piston striking the bottom of the head. Once the bearing is out of there, the piston moves up farther in the bore, eating up deck clearance. Oil pressure, once it burps for an instant, the rod bearings go first. We had this happen on a 302 in a Group 7 McLaren. We were spinning it up to 9,000 rpm when the oil-filter seal blew out. It actually blued the big end of the rod. We turned the crank 0.010 under and reused it. Only the rod and piston needed replacing. Chances are your crank is okay, but it should be checked for straightness. Also check the mains to make sure they are still straight.
Check the picture. This is a Carrillo rod we just pulled out of a 351. The bearing had standard oil clearances and the engine wasn't turning over 8,500 rpm when the bearing grabbed the journal and broke the cap bolts. The cause was super low viscosity oil being used for qualifying. Squeezed out the oil under load and it was metal to metal . . . bang. The crank is being reused, but the rod and piston is junk.
__________________ "History does not entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid."
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
Last edited by speed220mph; 03-04-08 at 04:39 PM.
|
| |
03-05-08, 07:20 AM
|
#33 (permalink)
| | Julian West 7 Tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Devon, UK GT40: GTD
Posts: 751
Rep Power: 15  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Speed220,
THx for the info. I'm part way thru pulling the motor out & hope to have it in the engine shop soon.
I'd be really interested to know what spec bottom end would be required to cope with higher revs, ie more than 6000 but probably not as much as 8000!!!!
regds, |
| |
03-05-08, 07:23 AM
|
#34 (permalink)
| | Julian West 7 Tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Devon, UK GT40: GTD
Posts: 751
Rep Power: 15  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Quote:
Originally Posted by speed220mph The cause was super low viscosity oil being used for qualifying. Squeezed out the oil under load and it was metal to metal . . . bang. The crank is being reused, but the rod and piston is junk.  | Just a thought, the oil I was using was Mobil 15W-50 fully synthetic.... would this be related??
Regds, |
| |
03-05-08, 09:19 AM
|
#35 (permalink)
| | ross nicol 10 tenths 
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: melbourne austr
Posts: 1,088
| Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? The engine in my race car at the moment has a standard(cast) crank and rods with ARP fasteners, even has hydraulic lifters. I rev it to 6500+ while racing and it has not failed. It has done at least 2 years service with no problems.I use Castrol mineral oil. I have been warned off Synthetics by A competent V8 engine Guru.I believe a dry sump is the only way to go for track work.
Ross
__________________ RF #025 currently racing
ZF,Motec injection
Lotus Europa S2
De Tomaso Pantera |
| |
03-05-08, 11:21 AM
|
#36 (permalink)
| | Gordon Levy Bronze Supporter 
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Maricopa AZ
Posts: 332
Rep Power: 11  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Julian, I believe the whole problem was low oil pressure. It wouldn't matter what oil was used. The pressure was not enough to protect the friction surface of the bearing and it eat itself.
I would be happy to answer any specific questions you may have. Please feel free to ask. |
| |
03-05-08, 04:29 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
| | speed220mph A Tenth 
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: North Carolina GT40: ERA GT
Posts: 182
Rep Power: 7  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian West Just a thought, the oil I was using was Mobil 15W-50 fully synthetic.... would this be related??
Regds, | Julian: Don't think the type of oil you were using had anything to do with it, but more the lack of oil. You mentioned over revving, but that would have more impact--pardon the pun--on the valves. You didn't mention whether you were cornering when this occurred. But if you were hard in a turn, could be the oil moved away from the pickup for an instant, which could be enough to starve the oiling system long enough to cause a pressure drop at the rod bearing. That's why I over-fill with oil before rolling out on the track.
This is problem plagued us in the early TransAm days. The Boss engines had plenty of power, but at high rpm and cornering g caused oil starvation because were required to use wet-sump systems. The result was frequently the same failure as your engine experienced.
A cure short of going wet sump is to install an Accusump. Coated bearings are another insurance policy. My $0.02 worth.
I hope my ramblings help.
Tom
__________________ "History does not entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid."
- Dwight D. Eisenhower |
| |
03-06-08, 02:20 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
| | 10 tenths 
Join Date: Jun 2002 GT40: San Francisco Bay Area California USA
Posts: 1,947
Rep Power: 26  | Re: 302 failure - any opinions??? These hyd roller lifter 302's will live longer, run better lap times, and in general work as designed if you shift them at something like 5600 -5800 revs. Even with a complete upgrade of the valve train, roller rockers, valve springs, pushrods, the works and a cam that will work for you above 6K, you will still be shifting atwell below 6500 in a hyd lifter motor.
With the exception of top gear and a long straight their just isn't a need to rev them much higher than 6K anyway.
Now on the other hand. If you are talking a solid roller cam engine, forged internals, with racegas compression ratios and first rate heads, then the skys the limmit $$$$$$$$$$$$$.
The main points of your rebuild should be, use ARP rod bolts, really get the clearances right, and have the engine rotating assembly and it's external parts, dampner, pulley, crank, clutch, as close as possible to a perfect ballance job as you can. After that, the first upgrade I would do is a set of quality valve springs and cam. You will still be at or below 6K revs but the idea is to get the power to continue building beyond 5400 or so where these FMS crate engines run out of steam and up to 5900ish. These are practical revs limmits (long useful reliable live) for the cast cranks, stock rods and production cast ports in FMS heads such as the XB303 that are used on a lot of the Ford crate motors. |
| | |