GT40s.com
MK-I  MK-II  MK-III  MK-IV  GULF  MIRAGE  J-CAR  LOLA
GT40s.com
Home Forum Gallery Support GT40s.com  
Register FAQ Advertisers Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   GT40s.com > GT40 Technical Forums > GT40 Tech - Exterior, Interior, AC, & Trim

GT40 Tech - Exterior, Interior, AC, & Trim All that other stuff not in categories above.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18th June 2012, 12:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
Racing Division Inc's Avatar
Racing Division Inc
A Tenth
United States
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
GT40: RCR GT40
Posts: 165
Toxic cabin

I've decided no more multi-hour drives in the GT until I remedy the toxic gasses in the cockpit. I've done much to eliminate any passage ways between the engine bay and cockpit but without quality fresh air coming in it is still a health hazard.

My thinking is to drill 3" holes in the front bulkhead (same location as original MK1's and venting fresh air in from the NACA ducts on the front wings. I am also considering using a bilge fan to bring the air in regardless if the car is in motion. Comments please.

Also I am considering putting vent holes in the rear engine bay Plexiglas to expedite the removal of unburned fumes from the Webers as well. Comments please.

Thanks
Racing Division Inc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012, 12:42 PM   #2 (permalink)
Mark IV's Avatar
Mark IV
Sponsoring Vendor
United States
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: W. New York
GT40: Superformance
Posts: 2,458
Re: Toxic cabin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racing Division Inc View Post
I've decided no more multi-hour drives in the GT until I remedy the toxic gasses in the cockpit. I've done much to eliminate any passage ways between the engine bay and cockpit but without quality fresh air coming in it is still a health hazard.

My thinking is to drill 3" holes in the front bulkhead (same location as original MK1's and venting fresh air in from the NACA ducts on the front wings. I am also considering using a bilge fan to bring the air in regardless if the car is in motion. Comments please.

Also I am considering putting vent holes in the rear engine bay Plexiglas to expedite the removal of unburned fumes from the Webers as well. Comments please.

Thanks
If you can pressurize the cabin to a greater pressure than the engine bay you will solve a lot of the issue. That said, very hard to do with the scoops filling the engine bay at speed to a pressure greater than the cabin!

A good seal hunt on the cabin to engine bay will help as will the inlet of fresh, ambient air. The bilge fan idea is probably best if used to extract cabin air thus requiring fresh air to replace the lost volume.
__________________
The GT 40 reunion at the Glen in 1989 was as close to Heaven as I'll get...
Mark IV is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012, 12:51 PM   #3 (permalink)
Racing Division Inc's Avatar
Racing Division Inc
A Tenth
United States
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
GT40: RCR GT40
Posts: 165
Re: Toxic cabin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark IV View Post
If you can pressurize the cabin to a greater pressure than the engine bay you will solve a lot of the issue. That said, very hard to do with the scoops filling the engine bay at speed to a pressure greater than the cabin!

A good seal hunt on the cabin to engine bay will help as will the inlet of fresh, ambient air. The bilge fan idea is probably best if used to extract cabin air thus requiring fresh air to replace the lost volume.
So if I use one of my bulkhead holes as a fresh air in (no bilge fan) and the other as air out (with bilge fan) would that be something to consider? OR is it better to bring as much fresh air in (bilge fans for both sides) as possible?
Racing Division Inc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012, 01:38 PM   #4 (permalink)
IanAnderson's Avatar
IanAnderson
Gold Supporter
United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ashford
GT40: Dax 40 Mk1 (Rov
Posts: 3,074
Re: Toxic cabin

I had the same thing on the Dax when I gt it on the road - so much that for a couple of years I drove without the drivers window!

I then started sealing the bulkhead.

First the bulkhead cover for the front of the engine - I ran around the outside of it with 13mm wide 2mm closed cell foam rubber. then screwed it back in place and the difference was huge!

I then lifted the carpet around the handbrake and sealed it with aluminuim tape - then reinserted the carpet

It then almost became bearable but still too hot to drive

So I then had 2 ducts from the front brake ducts plumbed in (with 2 bilge fans (4 inch) for traffic) and the difference is huge - fresh air all the time and at anything over about 15 mph no need for fans

Be aware if you drive in cold weather you may need to stuff a sponge into the duct to reduce the extra cold air as it can be a "bit too much"

See post 132
DAX Build Up

Ian
__________________
DAX GT40. Morgan 3.9 EFi, Worked by John Eales.
Renault Box, Always makes me smile!
IanAnderson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012, 01:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
Jim Craik's Avatar
Jim Craik
Lifetime Premier Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saratoga, CA
GT40: P2264
Posts: 4,125
Re: Toxic cabin

One thing I have found, although it may be only a temporary fix.

I find if I open the little window vents, it creates low pressure in the cabin and draws air in from both the front and rear bulkheads. If I leave the window vents closed the car stays cooler and has less fumes.
__________________
Ah, but I was so much older then....
Jim Craik is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012, 02:49 PM   #6 (permalink)
Racing Division Inc's Avatar
Racing Division Inc
A Tenth
United States
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
GT40: RCR GT40
Posts: 165
Re: Toxic cabin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Craik View Post
One thing I have found, although it may be only a temporary fix.

I find if I open the little window vents, it creates low pressure in the cabin and draws air in from both the front and rear bulkheads. If I leave the window vents closed the car stays cooler and has less fumes.
Interesting thought. I have the small windows off as the builder did not buy the hinge and latches. Guess I will.

Regards
Racing Division Inc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012, 03:55 PM   #7 (permalink)
IanAnderson's Avatar
IanAnderson
Gold Supporter
United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ashford
GT40: Dax 40 Mk1 (Rov
Posts: 3,074
Re: Toxic cabin

How about some helicopter vents facing forward to scoop air into the cockpit

This will help raise pressure in the cockpit and reduce the fumes coming in

3 1/2" Large Cockpit Ventilators (Pair) Helicopter Vents - CVNTL

Ian
__________________
DAX GT40. Morgan 3.9 EFi, Worked by John Eales.
Renault Box, Always makes me smile!
IanAnderson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012, 04:00 PM   #8 (permalink)
Racing Division Inc's Avatar
Racing Division Inc
A Tenth
United States
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
GT40: RCR GT40
Posts: 165
Re: Toxic cabin

Quote:
Originally Posted by IanAnderson View Post
How about some helicopter vents facing forward to scoop air into the cockpit

This will help raise pressure in the cockpit and reduce the fumes coming in

3 1/2" Large Cockpit Ventilators (Pair) Helicopter Vents - CVNTL

Ian
Thanks for that, already running one in each side window. Good but need more fresh air...

http://racingdivision.com/GT40/1965MK1-1B/
Racing Division Inc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012, 06:05 PM   #9 (permalink)
Cliffbeer2
Gold Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sand Point, WA
Posts: 2,170
Re: Toxic cabin

Michael,

I assume you're smelling gas fumes....

One fix that I think works well for multiple reasons is small powered fans on the rear clam shell actively sucking engine bay fumes out the back. This both helps to keep the positive pressure down in the engine bay (less fumes into the cabin), and helps to keep engine temps down. Spal makes nice little 6" low-amp fans which can be either pushers or pullers and they come with a nice frame around the fan for easy mounting. Just an idea.
Cliffbeer2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012, 06:36 PM   #10 (permalink)
Dwight
Bronze Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florence, Al
GT40: RCR GT 40
Posts: 143
Smile Re: Toxic cabin

Chuck's idea may help

Chuck and Ryan's RCR Build



Re: Chuck and Ryan's RCR Build<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
<HR style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #deedf2; COLOR: #deedf2" SIZE=1><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Blow Job

The persistent summer heat has not prevented us from driving the GT. The air conditioning makes an evening drive in ninety plus heat quite manageable. But the engine compartment does not seem to be faring as well.

Lifting the clip after an hour drive in ninety plus heat revealed a worrisome issue. The fiberglass above the engine was very hot to the touch and soft, almost pliable. There was no visible damage, but such high temperatures can’t be good. One can’t always raise the clip after shutting down when stopping away from home.

It seems that the hot air stagnates below the clip above the engine. At low speed I suspect there is little air movement. Driving in traffic is tough to avoid. So a means of moving that air was sought.

There are two five inch diameter access openings on the sponsons. They come drilled and tapped for a cover plate. Air drawn from that opening enters from the rear of the sponson; seemingly an ideal source since it is low where the air is cooler and in a area where the aerodynamics of the car should not affect the air flow.

We found the perfect fan for this application. Derale Cooling Products, Part number 16505, available from several sources including Summit. It is five inches in diameter and fits perfectly over the opening on the sponson. It moves 325 CFM of air and draws 3.6 amps. Those are respectable specs for such a small fan.

The fans have three mounting tabs. Two line up perfectly with the existing holes for the cover plate. It was a simple matter to drill and tap the third. Quarter inch nylon spacers were placed below the mounting tabs so that the screws could be tightened down without damaging the mounting tabs.

The fans are only 1.250 inches thick and thus do not interfere with the suspension. Indeed, once installed they are difficult to see, blending in well.

The fans were wired through a relay. The relay is activated by a switch on the dash, giving us the option of keeping the fans on after the car has been shut down. When the car was originally wired an extra wire from the dash fan – override switch was run to the rear of the car for this contingency.

With a total of 650 CFM the fans blow plenty of air. Stopping after a brisk three quarter hour drive in ninety degree heat, one could feel the flow of warm air being blown from those fans at the openings of the rear of the clip above and on either side of the exhaust pipes. The fans move the air from the front to the rear of the clip effectively. This will supplement the natural flow from the side vents when driving at speed.

Most important, when the clip was lifted the fiberglass was not nearly as hot and did not have that soft, almost pliable feel.

The fans are loud. They sound like typical electric radiator fans. You won’t walk away from the car without realizing they are on. Of course the sound inside the cabin is subdued and not that noticeable compared to the sound of the engine a foot from your ear.

Yarn tell tales taped to the rear clip move noticeably when the fans are on confirming the flow of air out the rear of the clip.

Check out the video version . . . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0i3Htxd9I4<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
<FIELDSET class=fieldset><LEGEND>Attached Thumbnails</LEGEND>
</FIELDSET>

Last edited by Dwight; 18th June 2012 at 06:37 PM. Reason: add text
Dwight is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012, 10:39 PM   #11 (permalink)
wbmusarra's Avatar
wbmusarra
I Have No Life
United States
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Snellville, Ga.
GT40: DRB#5
Posts: 2,377
Re: Toxic cabin

I did essentially what Chuck and Ryan did except with Spal fans. My engine builder blistered the paint over my exhaust during a tuning session. The car was siting still for about an hour with the motor running which led me to extra insulation of the clip portion just over the exhaust. It was about that time I decided to use the fans also, about the time Chuck came up with his. To be safe I added an off delay relay. It allows the fans to run for a predetermined amount of time after the engine is shut down. Later on I will incorporate the electric water pump into the timer to cut down on heat soak. They can be had with any time that you want them to run, from a few seconds to more than several hours. I have mine at 3 minutes which seems like a long time when you stand there waiting for them to turn off, but they do the job.

Bill
__________________
DRB#5
351W/392 DIS TWM F. I. 930 Porsche LSD
wbmusarra is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2012, 09:00 AM   #12 (permalink)
wealdenengineer
10 tenths
United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: East Sussex, UK
Posts: 1,687
Re: Toxic cabin

Another alternative, dont run with side windows in very hot weather, we use these small wind deflectors, mounted into the same fixing holes as the perspex, and these make a very comfortable but wind free cockpit, Frank
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DCP00562.JPG
Views:	116
Size:	255.5 KB
ID:	59401   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF2907.jpg
Views:	117
Size:	151.8 KB
ID:	59402   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF2910.jpg
Views:	97
Size:	132.6 KB
ID:	59403  
wealdenengineer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2012, 09:41 AM   #13 (permalink)
Big-Foot's Avatar
Big-Foot
Super Moderator
United States
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kenyon, MN
GT40: RCR40 - #45
Posts: 4,787
Re: Toxic cabin

Frank, those look very nice. Particularly the ones on Martin's car. I wonder if they would fit my RCR doors? Fiberglass? Hmmmm....
__________________
Regards - Randy
GT40 RCR40 #45 G50-331-Weber IDAs
My build site:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Big-Foot is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2012, 09:57 AM   #14 (permalink)
wealdenengineer
10 tenths
United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: East Sussex, UK
Posts: 1,687
Re: Toxic cabin

Or Carbon !
wealdenengineer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2012, 10:15 AM   #15 (permalink)
IanAnderson's Avatar
IanAnderson
Gold Supporter
United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ashford
GT40: Dax 40 Mk1 (Rov
Posts: 3,074
Re: Toxic cabin

I did nention that for the first couple of years I drove mine without side window on drivers side.

Even without the deflectors it was comfortable inside p to about 80mph - after that I got a bit more wind noise but still not badly buffeted inside

If you have rivnuts in the door to screw the window in place try removing it - start to finish I could do it in less than 5 minutes!

Ian
__________________
DAX GT40. Morgan 3.9 EFi, Worked by John Eales.
Renault Box, Always makes me smile!
IanAnderson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2012, 04:08 AM   #16 (permalink)
Malcolm's Avatar
Malcolm
Gold Supporter
United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Surrey, UK
GT40: GTD
Posts: 2,245
Re: Toxic cabin

A source for heat getting into the cabin in a GTD used to be from the engine bay, down past the tanks and up the gear stick mechanism. I used to be able to feel an updraft! A well made gaiter stopped that source of heat and if you are getting fumes they may be getting picked up along the way. My concern over what is being said here is that you should be more worried over the source of the fumes rather than just looking on how to get rid of them better. If gas fumes then perhaps you have a fuel leak somewhere and that ought to be sorted pronto. If exhaust fumes then is the exhaust properly sealed? Heat from the radiator should not be toxic just unpleasant. What other source of auto related toxic fumes are there in a car? But running without windows is nice!
__________________
Malcolm
GTD40, Porsche 996 C4S, new MX5 race car project
Malcolm is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2012, 12:05 PM   #17 (permalink)
Racing Division Inc's Avatar
Racing Division Inc
A Tenth
United States
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
GT40: RCR GT40
Posts: 165
Re: Toxic cabin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malcolm View Post
My concern over what is being said here is that you should be more worried over the source of the fumes rather than just looking on how to get rid of them better. If gas fumes then perhaps you have a fuel leak somewhere and that ought to be sorted pronto. If exhaust fumes then is the exhaust properly sealed? Heat from the radiator should not be toxic just unpleasant. What other source of auto related toxic fumes are there in a car? But running without windows is nice!
I have done a major reseal of the fire wall, including plugging holes and weather-stripping the rear body work. Given that there is negative pressure in the cabin any fumes, be it unburnt petrol from the Webers, crank case venting or exhaust are finding it's way into the cabin. Worst in stop and go than at speed.

Instead of cutting into the bulk head I have decided to use the access panel (1965 GT40 MK1 #1 Details) just above the foot well to add an electric fan. This would bring in "fresh air" from the front of the car into the cabin. My thinking it is better to bring in this air even if it will be warmer than ambient air given the proximity to the radiator than the stagnent air I currently am dealing with. Additionally my asumption is that it is better to bring air in rather than mount the fan to extract the fumes out. Extracting the air would be creating a greater negitive flow causing more fumes to find thier way in not less.

Comments?
Racing Division Inc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2012, 12:19 PM   #18 (permalink)
K.Wilson
Lifetime Premier Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
GT40: RCR, Mark 1
Posts: 212
Re: Toxic cabin

One of the few changes I made to mine after I got it on the road was related to a fuel smell. I had installed the fuel tank vents/roll over valves up by the fuel filler caps so that they would be hidden under the front clip. Under deceleration the fuel in the tanks would race forward in the tank and vent the vapor out the roll over valves under the front clip. The vapor collected in that area and seeped into the passenger compartment thru the gaps in the front of the doors. The more spirited I drove the car the worse the smell. I fixed it by taking the top caps off the rollover valves and drilling and taping (1/8 NPT) for a barb fitting then running a piece of neoprene fuel line from the barb fitting under the car into the rocker pannel area. The fuel smell went away.
You may want to take a look at where your fuel tanks are vented to see if you have a similar issue...............
K.Wilson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2012, 12:28 PM   #19 (permalink)
Racing Division Inc's Avatar
Racing Division Inc
A Tenth
United States
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
GT40: RCR GT40
Posts: 165
Re: Toxic cabin

Quote:
Originally Posted by K.Wilson View Post
One of the few changes I made to mine after I got it on the road was related to a fuel smell. I had installed the fuel tank vents/roll over valves up by the fuel filler caps so that they would be hidden under the front clip. Under deceleration the fuel in the tanks would race forward in the tank and vent the vapor out the roll over valves under the front clip. The vapor collected in that area and seeped into the passenger compartment thru the gaps in the front of the doors. The more spirited I drove the car the worse the smell. I fixed it by taking the top caps off the rollover valves and drilling and taping (1/8 NPT) for a barb fitting then running a piece of neoprene fuel line from the barb fitting under the car into the rocker pannel area. The fuel smell went away.
You may want to take a look at where your fuel tanks are vented to see if you have a similar issue...............
Thanks for the advice. I did make some changes to the fuel venting some time ago, agree. When on the track the first time my eyes watered so bad from the amount of fuel fumes. I am assuming it is not the case today as fuel has a very specific odor. What I am left with after driving is head aches and exhaustion.

I'll keep working on it.
Racing Division Inc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2012, 12:30 PM   #20 (permalink)
awatkins's Avatar
awatkins
Lifetime Premier Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: not here
GT40: N/A
Posts: 2,374
Re: Toxic cabin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racing Division Inc View Post
I have done a major reseal of the fire wall, including plugging holes and weather-stripping the rear body work.
Possibly peripheral to the current discussion but this reminds me of a diagnostic method I once saw on a TV DIY program. Here they were trying to find door or window leaks, so in a closed garage they turned on the car's heater blower to max, closed the doors and windows, and then walked around the car with a lit cigarette near the seams and openings looking for distrubances in the smoke trail.

OK, obviously this is where everyone runs for the fire extinguisher and the life insurance policy, so maybe there's a better smoke source than a cigarette, but the basic idea seemed useful as a way of finding cabin air leaks.
awatkins is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cabin width MarkH The SLC Clubhouse 4 16th April 2012 08:33 PM
aircraft cabin or catwalk? marcus The Paddock 1 27th October 2007 05:58 PM
gas fumes in cabin raven1 GT40 Tech - Fueling, Electrics, & Engine Cooling 1 25th December 2006 07:24 PM
Cabin sound insulation simonjrwinter GT40 Tech - Exterior, Interior, AC, & Trim 10 7th May 2004 01:24 PM
Cabin insulation GT40 Tech - Chassis,Brakes,Tires,&Wheels 10 18th March 2003 09:47 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 AM.