GT40s.com
MK-I  MK-II  MK-III  MK-IV  GULF  MIRAGE  J-CAR  LOLA
GT40s.com
Home Forum Gallery Member Rides Support GT40s.com  
Register FAQ Members List Advertisers Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   GT40s.com > GT40 Media Center and GT40 Clubs > GTD 40 Car Club Forum

Notices

GTD 40 Car Club Forum Discussion from the GTD 40 Car Club in England.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-12-02, 06:54 AM   #1 (permalink)
United States
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0  is on a distinguished road
And the compression ratio was....

The other day Paul dropped by and measured the compression ratio on my engine. Was it low enough for turbos to be fitted without changing heads or so high that I need dodgy fuel to make the car run? Well, I will state that we got a boring 9.5:1 [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img] and you can decide for yourself if my times are plausible with a compression ratio such as this! You guys with fancy smancy engines should do better! And 9600 rpm, who would fall for that? [img]images/icons/rolleyes.gif[/img]

Malcolm
[img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]

[ November 12, 2002: Message edited by: Malcolm M ]
 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-02, 12:52 PM   #2 (permalink)
Bigend's Avatar
Bigend
3 Tenths
United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey UK
GT40: GTD
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 10 Bigend is on a distinguished road
Re: And the compression ratio was....

Wasn't it 19,600 rpm?
Bigend is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-02, 02:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
Ron Earp's Avatar
Ron Earp
Retiree
United States
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 4,082
Rep Power: 58 Ron Earp has disabled reputation
Re: And the compression ratio was....

But how big is the motor?

Lots of aircraft engines in WWII didn't have such high compressions either, but 27 liters is hard to argue with!

Ron
Ron Earp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-02, 06:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
p thompson's Avatar
p thompson
Administrator
United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Milland, West S
GT40: None
Posts: 2,257
Rep Power: 37 p thompson has a brilliant futurep thompson has a brilliant futurep thompson has a brilliant futurep thompson has a brilliant futurep thompson has a brilliant future
Re: And the compression ratio was....

Hi Malc -
Went for the 'honest option' then - I agree with Ron - there ain't no substitute for cubic inches and with one or more superchargers - all the better!

Hi Mike - I seem to remember you drive a rather quick turbocharged V8 - what compression does it have and how much boost? - either way flaming quick as I recall!
p thompson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-02, 06:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Ron Earp's Avatar
Ron Earp
Retiree
United States
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 4,082
Rep Power: 58 Ron Earp has disabled reputation
Re: And the compression ratio was....

With excellent fuel control and engine control (knock sensing with electronic retard) you should be fine at 9.5:1. I know there aren't many OEM motors that are blown with 9.5:1 but you'll be fine, especially if you keep the boost down. I used to run 22lbs on a motor at 8.7:1 and it was fine with excellent gas and proper timing.

R
Ron Earp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-02, 05:58 AM   #6 (permalink)
United States
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0  is on a distinguished road
Re: And the compression ratio was....

Turbo's? No thanks, don't like them from my experiences so far. Also makes the car too technical for my oily rag techniques!

Was discussing the compression situatioon with Dave Milham who is planned on rebuilding it for me later this year. He doesn't think that the compression should be as low as stated taking into account the parts fitted to the engine. I shall have to get him to measure it for me also when he has the engine. However it doesn't matter as I ain't changing anything apart from the worn out bits so will keep whatever compression ratio I have, whatever it really is.

Malcolm
 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 AM.