Teaching Math

Pete McCluskey.

Lifetime Supporter
I was going to put this in the joke thread, but then thought It's not really a joke.


<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
P><P align=center><DIV align=center><FONT face=Helvetica><FONT size=3><FONT color=black><FONT color=black><FONT face=Helvetica><HR tabIndex=-1 align=center width=
</DIV>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">1. Teaching Maths In 1970</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>

<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">A logger sells a truck load of timber for $1000. His cost of production is 4/5 of the selling price. What is his profit?
</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">2. Teaching Maths In 1980</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">A logger sells a truck load of timber for $1000. His cost of production is 4/5 of the selling price, or $800. What is his profit?
</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">3. Teaching Maths In 1990</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">A logger sells a truck load of timber for $1000. His cost of production is $800. Did he make a profit<DEFANGHTML_SPAN style="COLOR: navy">?
</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p></DEFANGHTML_SPAN>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">4. Teaching Maths In 2000</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">A logger sells a truck load of timber for $1000. His cost of production is $800 and his profit is $200.</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Your<DEFANGHTML_SPAN style="COLOR: black"> </DEFANGHTML_SPAN>assignment: Underline the number 200.
</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">5. Teaching Maths In 2008</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is totally selfish and inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habitat of animals or the preservation of our woodlands.</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">He does this so he can make a profit of $200. What do you think of this way of making a living?</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Topic for class participation after answering the question:</DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">How did the birds and possums feel as the logger cut down their homes? </DEFANGHTML_SPAN><DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: blue; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></DEFANGHTML_SPAN><o:p></o:p>
<DEFANGHTML_SPAN lang=EN-AU style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">(There are no wrong answers. If you are upset about the plight of the animals in question counseling will be available.)
 
Actually Pete, there is a wrong answer;

I accept the logger's need to harvest available resources to sustain his family's needs, allowing them to prosper and one day, go to a school like this one.

In nature, every organism makes use of another organism to sustain itself, so it is only right that we follow this pattern. We, as humans, have the ability to make a reasoned decision based upon our accumulated knowledge as to what quantity of harvest the forest can sustain, providing for our future needs and the good of the forest as a whole.


F!


I how long it will take the Iron Sheikh to arrive?????
 
That's pretty funny Pete. Unfortunately, it's not a completely inaccurate assessment of the progression across the decades. All is not lost however, there are some smart people who have some global reach and impact and are preaching the basics of common sense. Guess who this person is....

Love him or hate him, he sure hits the nail on the head with this one. To anyone with kids of any age, or anyone who has ever been a kid, here’s some advices [ ] dished out recently at a high school speech about 11 things they don’t teach in school. He talks about how feel-good, politically correct teachings have created a generation of kids with no concept of reality, and how this concept set them up for failure in the real world.
Rule 1: Life is not fair…get used to it.
Rule 2: The world won’t care about your self-esteem. The world will expect you to accomplish something BEFORE you feel good about yourself.
Rule 3: You will NOT make $40,000/year right out of high school. You won’t be a vice-president with a cell-phone, until you earn both.
Rule 4: If you think your teacher is tough, wait till you get a boss. He
doesn’t have tenure.
Rule 5: Flipping burgers is not beneath your dignity. Your grandparents had a word for flipping burgers-they called it opportunity.
Rule 6: If you mess up it’s not your parents fault, so don’t whine about
your mistakes, learn from them.
Rule 7: Before you were born, your parents weren’t as boring as they are
now. They got that way from paying your bills, cleaning your clothes, and
listening to how cool you are. So before you save the rain forest from the
parasites of your parents’ generation, try delousing the closet in your own room.
Rule 8: Your school may have done away with winners and losers, but life
hasn’t. In some schools they have abolished failing grades and they’ll give
you as many times as you want to get the answer right. This doesn’t bear the slightest resemblance to ANYTHING in real life.
Rule 9: Life is not divided into semesters. You don’t get summers and
Christmas break off, and very few employers are interested in helping you
find yourself. Do that on you own time.
Rule 10. Television is NOT real life. In real life people actually have to
leave the coffee shop and go to work.
Rule 11: Be nice to nerds. Chances are you’ll end up working for one.
Answer: Bill Gates - a guy who knows a thing or two about the world, and making money.
 
I know I'm always a wet blanket on this stuff, but the above was not written by Bill Gates. It was written by a guy named Sykes, who writes books about whats wrong with Americas education system.

Attributing simplistic stuff like this to intelligent, successful people tends to lend it more weight than it actually deserves.
 

Pete McCluskey.

Lifetime Supporter
I know I'm always a wet blanket on this stuff, but the above was not written by Bill Gates. It was written by a guy named Sykes, who writes books about whats wrong with Americas education system.

Attributing simplistic stuff like this to intelligent, successful people tends to lend it more weight than it actually deserves.

It might well be simplistic, but then I'm just a simple boy from the bush and it makes a lot of sense to me, no matter who wrote it.:cowboy:
 
A Mr. Sykes may have written it but that's not what I indicated - I indicated that Bill Gates has voiced these 11 rules in public, and indeed he has, numerous times in public speeches.

The important point is not the original author's name, but rather the impact of the message, and the reality is (like it or not) that a guy like Bill Gates makes quit an impact.
 
Actually, many sources site that Bill Gates never delivered this speech. It is sometimes
said he used it during a commencement speech to the 2002 Graduating Class at Mt.
Whitney High School in Visalia, CA. School officials have repudiated that.

And, even funnier, there are 3 things in the list this "hoax" leaves out:

Rule No. 12: Smoking does not make you look cool. It makes you look moronic. Next time
you're out cruising, watch an 11-year-old with a butt in his mouth. That's what you look
like to anyone over 20. Ditto for "expressing yourself" with purple hair and/or pierced body
parts.

Rule No. 13: You are not immortal. (See Rule No. 12.) If you are under the impression that
living fast, dying young and leaving a beautiful corpse is romantic, you obviously haven't
seen one of your peers at room temperature lately.

Rule No. 14: Enjoy this while you can. Sure parents are a pain, school's a bother,
and life is depressing. But someday you'll realize how wonderful it was to be a kid. Maybe
you should start now. You're welcome.

Ian
 
O K guys,
I have a commencement address that is better than that and says a lot more than that:

Neal Boortz

Commencement Speech

No, this speech has never been delivered at a college or a university. It was written to protest the fact that such an invitation has never been offered! It has only been delivered on my radio show, printed in my book "The Terrible Truth About Liberals" and produced on a limited edition CD. The irony is that this commencement speech has been more widely distributed, and has been the subject of more comment than any commencement speech that actually has been delivered at any college or university in the past 50 years. ©Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003 by Neal Boortz.
http://www.boortz.com


I am honored by the invitation to address you on this august occasion. It's about time. Be warned, however, that I am not here to impress you; you'll have enough smoke blown your way today. And you can bet your tassels I'm not here to impress the faculty and administration.

You may not like much of what I have to say, and that's fine. You will remember it though. Especially after about 10 years out there in the real world. This, it goes without saying, does not apply to those of you who will seek your careers and your fortunes as government employees.

This gowned gaggle behind me is your faculty. You've heard the old saying that those who can - do. Those who can't - teach. That sounds deliciously insensitive. But there is often raw truth in insensitivity, just as you often find feel-good falsehoods and lies in compassion. Say good-bye to your faculty because now you are getting ready to go out there and do. These folks behind me are going to stay right here and teach.

By the way, just because you are leaving this place with a diploma doesn't mean the learning is over. When an FAA flight examiner handed me my private pilot's license many years ago, he said, 'Here, this is your ticket to learn.' The same can be said for your diploma. Believe me, the learning has just begun.

Now, I realize that most of you consider yourselves Liberals. In fact, you are probably very proud of your liberal views. You care so much. You feel so much. You want to help so much. After all, you're a compassionate and caring person, aren't you now? Well, isn't that just so extraordinarily special. Now, at this age, is as good a time as any to be a Liberal; as good a time as any to know absolutely everything. You have plenty of time, starting tomorrow, for the truth to set in. Over the next few years, as you begin to feel the cold breath of reality down your neck, things are going to start changing pretty fast .. including your own assessment of just how much you really know.

So here are the first assignments for your initial class in reality: Pay attention to the news, read newspapers, and listen to the words and phrases that proud Liberals use to promote their causes. Then compare the words of the left to the words and phrases you hear from those evil, heartless, greedy conservatives. From the Left you will hear "I feel." From the Right you will hear "I think." From the Liberals you will hear references to groups --The Blacks, The Poor, The Rich, The Disadvantaged, The Less Fortunate. From the Right you will hear references to individuals. On the Left you hear talk of group rights; on the Right, individual rights.

That about sums it up, really: Liberals feel. Liberals care. They are pack animals whose identity is tied up in group dynamics. Conservatives and Libertarians think -- and, setting aside the theocracy crowd, their identity is centered on the individual.

Liberals feel that their favored groups, have enforceable rights to the property and services of productive individuals. Conservatives (and Libertarians, myself among them I might add) think that individuals have the right to protect their lives and their property from the plunder of the masses.

In college you developed a group mentality, but if you look closely at your diplomas you will see that they have your individual names on them. Not the name of your school mascot, or of your fraternity or sorority, butyourname. Your group identity is going away. Your recognition and appreciation of your individual identity starts now.

If, by the time you reach the age of 30, you do not consider yourself to be a libertarian or a conservative, rush right back here as quickly as you can and apply for a faculty position. These people will welcome you with open arms. They will welcome you, that is, so long as you haven't developed an individual identity. Once again you will have to be willing to sign on to the group mentality you embraced during the past four years.

Something is going to happen soon that is going to really open your eyes. You're going to actually get a full time job! You're also going to get a lifelong work partner. This partner isn't going to help you do your job. This partner is just going to sit back and wait for payday. This partner doesn't want to share in your effort, just your earnings.

Your new lifelong partner is actually an agent; an agent representing a strange and diverse group of people. An agent for every teenager with an illegitimate child. An agent for a research scientist who wanted to make some cash answering the age-old question of why monkeys grind their teeth. An agent for some poor aging hippie who considers herself to be a meaningful and talented artist ... but who just can't manage to sell any of her artwork on the open market.

Your new partner is an agent for every person with limited, if any, job skills; for every person who ignored all offered educational opportunities, dreaming of nothing more than a job at City Hall. An agent for tin-horn dictators in fancy military uniforms grasping for American foreign aid. An agent for multi-million-dollar companies who want someone else to pay for their overseas advertising. An agent for everybody who wants to use the unimaginable power of this agent's for their personal enrichment and benefit.

That agent is our wonderful, caring, compassionate, oppressive Imperial Federal Government. Believe me, you will be awed by the unimaginable power this agent has. Power that you do not have. A power that no individual has, will have or should have. This agent has the legal power to use force – deadly force – to accomplish its goals.

You have no choice here. Your new friend is just going to walk up to you, introduce itself rather gruffly, hand you a few forms to fill out, and move right on in. Say hello to your own personal one ton gorilla with a gun. It will sleep anywhere it wants to.

Now, let me tell you, this agent is not cheap. As you become successful it will seize about 40% of everything you earn. And no, I'm sorry, there just isn't any way you can fire this agent of plunder, and you can't decrease it's share of your income. That power rests with him, not you.

So, here I am saying negative things to you about government. Well, be clear on this: It is not wrong to distrust government. It is not wrong to fear government. In certain cases it is not even wrong to despise government for government is inherently evil. Oh yes, I know it's a necessary evil, but it is dangerous nonetheless ... somewhat like a drug. Just as a drug that in the proper dosage can save your life, an overdose of government can be fatal.

Now – let's address a few things that have been crammed into your minds at this university. There are some ideas you need to expunge as soon as possible. These ideas may work well in academic environment, but they fail miserably out there in the real world.

First – that favorite buzz word of the media, government and academia: Diversity!

You have been taught that the real value of any group of people - be it a social group, an employee group, a management group, whatever - is based on diversity. This is a favored liberal ideal because diversity is based not on an individual's abilities or character, but on a person's identity and status as a member of a group. Yes – it's that liberal group identity thing again.

Within the great diversity movement group identification - be it racial, gender based, or some other minority status - means more than the individual's integrity, character or other qualifications.

Brace yourself. You are about to move from this academic atmosphere where diversity rules, to a workplace and a culture where individual achievement and excellence actually count. No matter what your professors have taught you over the last four years, you are about to learn that diversity is absolutely no replacement for excellence, ability, and individual hard work.

From this day on every single time you hear the word "diversity" you can rest assured that there is someone close by who is determined to rob you of every vestige of individuality you possess.

We also need to address this thing you seem to have about "rights." We have witnessed an obscene explosion of so-called "rights" in the last few decades, usually emanating from college campuses.

You know the mantra: You have the right to a job. The right to a place to live. The right to a living wage. The right to health care. The right to an education. You probably even have your own pet right - the right to a Beemer, for instance, or the right to have someone else provide for that child you plan on downloading in a year or so.

Forget it. Forget those rights! I'll tell you what your rights are! You have a right to live free, and to whatever wealth you are able to produce with your labor. I'll also tell you have no right to any portion of the life or labor of another.

You may think, for instance, that you have a right to health care. After all, Hillary said so, didn't she? But you cannot receive health care unless some doctor or health practitioner surrenders some of his time - his life - to you. He may be willing to do this for compensation, but that's his choice. You have no "right" to his time or property. You have no right to his or any other person's life or to any portion thereof.

You may also think you have some "right" to a job; a job with a living wage, whatever that is. Do you mean to tell me that you have a right to force your services on another person, and then the right to demand that this person compensate you with their money? I can't wait for you to point that one out for me in our Constitution. I sure would like to be a fly on the wall when some urban outdoorsmen (that would be "homeless person" for those of you who don't want to give these less fortunate people a romantic and adventurous title) came to you and demanded his job and your money.

The people who have been telling you about all the rights you have are simply exercising one of theirs - the right to be imbeciles. Their being imbeciles didn't cost anyone else either property or time. It's their right, and they exercise it brilliantly.

By the way, did you catch my use of the phrase "less fortunate" a bit ago when I was talking about the urban outdoorsmen? That phrase is a favorite of the Left. Think about it, and you'll understand why.

To imply that one person is homeless, destitute, dirty, drunk, spaced out on drugs, unemployable, and generally miserable because he is "less fortunate" is to imply that a successful person - one with a job, a home and a future - is in that position because he or she was "fortunate." The dictionary says that fortunate means "having derived good from an unexpected place." There is nothing unexpected about deriving good from hard work. There is also nothing unexpected about deriving misery from choosing drugs, alcohol, and the street instead of education and personal responsibility.

If the Left can create the common perception that success and failure are simple matters of "fortune" or "luck," then it is easy to promote and justify their various income redistribution schemes. After all, we are just evening out the odds a little bit, aren't we?

This "success equals luck" idea the liberals like to push is seen everywhere. Democratic presidential candidate Richard Gephardt refers to high-achievers as "people who have won life's lottery." He wants you to believe they are making the big bucks because they are lucky; all they did was buy the right lottery ticket. What an insult this is to the man or woman who works that 60 hour week to provide for a family.

It's not luck, my friends. It's choice. One of the greatest lessons I ever learned was in a book by Og Mandino, entitled "The Greatest Secret in the World." The lesson? Very simple: "Use wisely your power of choice."

That bum sitting on a heating grate, smelling like a wharf rat? He's there by choice. He is there because of the sum total of the choices he has made in his life. This truism is absolutely the hardest thing for some people to accept, especially those who consider themselves to be victims of something or other - victims of discrimination, bad luck, the system, capitalism, whatever. After all, nobody really wants to accept the blame for his or her position in life. Not when it is so much easier to point and say, "Look! He did this to me!" than it is to look into a mirror and say, "You S.O.B.! You did this to me!"

The key to accepting responsibility for your life is to accept the fact that your choices, every one of them, are leading you inexorably to either success or failure, however you define those terms.

Some of the choices are obvious: Whether or not to stay in school. Whether or not to get pregnant. Whether or not to hit the bottle. Whether or not to keep this job you hate until you get another better-paying job. Whether or not to save some of your money, or saddle yourself with huge payments for that new car.

Some of the choices are seemingly insignificant: Whom to go to the movies with. Whose car to ride home in. Whether to watch the tube tonight, or read a book on investing. But, and you can be sure of this, each choice counts. Each choice is a building block - some large, some small. But each one is a part of the structure of your life. If you make the right choices, or if you make more right choices than wrong ones, something absolutely terrible may happen to you. Something unthinkable. You, my friend, could become one of the hated, the evil, the ugly, the feared, the filthy, the successful, the rich.

Quite a few people have followed that tragic path.

The rich basically serve two purposes in this country. First, they provide the investments, the investment capital, and the brains for the formation of new businesses. Businesses that hire people. Businesses that send millions of paychecks home each week to the un-rich.

Second, the rich are a wonderful object of ridicule, distrust, and hatred. Few things are more valuable to a politician than the envy most Americans feel for the evil rich.

Envy is a powerful emotion. Even more powerful than the emotional minefield that surrounded Bill Clinton when he reviewed his last batch of White House interns. Politicians use envy to get votes and power. And they keep that power by promising the envious that the envied will be punished: "The rich will pay their fair share of taxes if I have anything to do with it.'

The truth is that the top 10% of income earners in this country pays almost 50% of all income taxes collected. I shudder to think what these job producers would be paying if our tax system were any more "fair."

You have heard, no doubt, that in America the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Interestingly enough, our government's own numbers show that many of the poor actually get richer, and that quite a few of the rich actually get poorer. But for the rich who do actually get richer, and the poor who remain poor ... there's an explanation -- a reason. The rich, you see, keep doing the things that make them rich; while the poor keep doing the things that make them poor.

Speaking of the poor, during your adult life you are going to hear an endless string of politicians bemoaning the plight of the poor in America. So, you need to know that under our government's definition of "poor" you can have a $5 million net worth, a $300,000 home and a new $90,000 Mercedes, all completely paid for. You can also have a maid, cook, and valet, and $1 million in your checking account, and you can still be officially defined by our government as "living in poverty." Now there's something you haven't seen on the evening news.

How does the government pull this one off? Very simple, really. To determine whether or not some poor soul is "living in poverty," the government measures one thing -- just one thing. Income. It doesn't matter one bit how much you have, how much you own, how many cars you drive or how big they are, whether or not your pool is heated, whether you winter in Aspen and spend the summers in the Bahamas, or how much is in your savings account. It only matters how much income you claim in that particular year. This means that if you take a one-year leave of absence from your high-paying job and decide to live off the money in your savings and checking accounts while you write the next great American novel, the government says you are 'living in poverty."

This isn't exactly what you had in mind when you heard these gloomy statistics, is it?

Do you need more convincing? Try this. The government's own statistics show that people who are said to be "living in poverty" spend more than $1.50 for each dollar of income they claim. Something is a bit fishy here. just remember all this the next time Peter Jennings puffs up and tells you about some hideous new poverty statistics.

And please remember this: The average person in this country described as "poor" has a higher standard of living than the average European. Not the average "poor" European, the average European.

Why has the government concocted this phony poverty scam? Because the government needs an excuse to grow and to expand its social welfare programs, which translates into an expansion of its power. If the government can convince you, in all your compassion,that the number of "poor" is increasing, it will have all the excuse it needs to sway an electorate suffering from the advanced stages of Obsessive-Compulsive Compassion Disorder.

Well, it looks like I'm about to be given the hook. The faculty looks a little angry. I'll bet they've already changed their minds about that honorary degree I was going to get.That's OK, though. I still have my Ph.D. in Insensitivity from the Neal Boortz Institute for Insensitivity Training. I learned that, in short, sensitivity sucks. It's a trap. Think about it - the truth knows no sensitivity. Life can be insensitive. Wallow too much in sensitivity and you'll be unable to deal with life, or the truth. So, get over it.

Now, before the dean has me shackled and hauled off, I have a few random thoughts.


  • You need to register to vote, unless you are on welfare. If you are living off the efforts of others, please do us the favor of sitting down and shutting up until you are on your own again. To the welfare class I say that we're taking care of you we would appreciate if if you would just stay out of our way so we can get the job done.
  • When you do vote, your votes for the House and the Senate are more important than your vote for president. The House controls the purse strings, so concentrate your awareness there.
  • Liars cannot be trusted, even when the liar is the president of the United States. If someone can't deal honestly with you, send them packing.
  • Don't bow to the temptation to use the government as an instrument of plunder. If it is wrong for you to take money from someone else who earned it -- to take their money by force for your own needs -- then it is certainly just as wrong for you to demand that the government step forward and do this dirty work for you.
  • Don't look in other people's pockets. You have no business there. What they earn is theirs. What your earn is yours. Keep it that way. Nobody owes you anything, except to respect your privacy and your rights, and leave you the hell alone.
  • Speaking of earning, the revered 40-hour workweek is for losers. Forty hours should be considered the minimum, not the maximum. You don't see highly successful people clocking out of the office every afternoon at five. The losers are the ones caught up in that afternoon rush hour. The winners drive home in the dark.
  • Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection.
  • Finally (and aren't you glad to hear that word), as Og Mandino wrote,

    1. Proclaim your rarity. Each of you is a rare and unique human being.

    2. Use wisely your power of choice.

    3. Go the extra mile ... drive home in the dark.

    Oh, and put off buying a television set as long as you can.

    Now, if you have any idea at all what's good for you, you will get the hell out of here and never come back.

    Class dismissed.
 
I suspect that most of agree with the sentiment but it is a bit sanctimonious considering that Neal Boortz has only had 2 jobs in life - Lawyer and Radio Host! (no offense to Radio Hosts!)
 
You evidently don't know Neal as well as you think you do:

Neal Boortz aka: The Talkmaster, Mighty Whitey and The High Priest of The Church of the Painful Truth.

More Than You Really Want to Know!

051005_boortz_2_200.jpg
Some of you have been having a big time with my Web Page, but you may not be sure just who in the ever-loving hell I am. I have noticed hits from as far away as Great Britain and Southeast Asia. Hey, I may be syndicated, but I don't think I'm on any station in Saigon.

For those of you who don't know, Neal Boortz (that's me) has been a Talk Show Host (What Bill Clinton would refer to as a "Preacher of Hate") in Atlanta, Georgia since 1969. Since 1993 I have been holding forth on News Talk 750 WSB, a radio station with a 50,000 watt afterburner. Since early 1999 my show has been syndicated on radio stations from Maine to California and from Alaska to Florida. My program airs live from 8:30 to 1:00 pm each weekday. Right now I am closing in on four million listeners nationwide. Hey, that's not up to Limbaugh standards, but then I'm growing faster than he is.

Background? O.K., as if you weren't bored enough.

I was born on April 6, 1945 in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania. I didn't particularly like the accent of the people up there so I left for Texas about 30 days later when my Dad returned to the Pacific to continue his participation in World War II. (Marine pilot.) Texas was always my "official" residence, but I lived all over the place since Dad was in the Marine Corps. Some addresses would include Honolulu, Hawaii, Laguna Beach, California, Morehead City, North Carolina; Virginia Beach, Virginia, Pensacola, Florida and others.

By the ever-loving skin of my teeth I graduated High School in 1963 from Pensacola High with something like a C- average. A good collection of Polaroid photos of a member of the admissions staff opened the doors to Texas A&M University, and off I went. I was a worse student at A&M than I was in high school. I finished at A&M in 1967 and came to Atlanta to visit my parents. Dad was working at Lockheed at the time. I liked the place, and I stayed. I've been here ever since.

I wasn't through with higher education after Texas A&M. I entered law school in Atlanta in 1973 and graduated in 1977. Law school finally presented a challenge worthy of my attention, so I worked at it and graduated near the top of my class. I passed the bar before graduation so I went into practice immediately. I continued practicing law until I signed a contract with WSB in 1992.

During my years in talk radio I have managed to find other things to do. We'll attribute this to the fact that I am easily bored. From 1977 to 1992, as I said, I practiced law in addition to doing the talk show. Prior to 1977 you could find me working as a jewelry or carpet buyer, an insurance salesman, selling life and casualty insurance, loading trucks, slinging mail at the post office, working in an employment office, writing speeches for the Governor of Georgia and auditing the books overnight at a sleazy motel. Since I didn't retire from my law practice until I signed with WSB in 1992 this would mean that I was 47 years old before I ever had less than two jobs

I live in the Northern 'burbs during the week and in Southwest Florida during most weekends. When I'm not on the air or giving a speech somewhere, I like to spend whatever free time is left playing golf or flying. When it's time to slip the bonds of gravity I choose between a hot air balloon, my Mooney Ovation2 or my Super Decathlon. There's nothing like flying upside down to clear your mind ... among other things.

When I feel particularly frisky I like to sit down and write. My first book, "The Terrible Truth About Liberals," has been through six different printings. I'm presently working on my next book, "Somebody Has To Say It." I expect a brutal bidding war from several publishers for that one.

Politics? I'm a confirmed Libertarian. I believe that the principal difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is that the Democrats just want to grow our Imperial Federal Government a bit faster than the Republicans do.

Yes, I'm married. My wife, Donna, doesn't listen to the show. Never has. This is good. My daughter, Laura, uses a fake last name. Another good idea.

121004_boortz_lunch_10.jpg


Run for office? Well, thanks for asking --- but I'm afraid that the worst possible thing would happen. I would win. That would be a financial disaster for me. I am, however, toying with the idea of running for President on the Libertarian Party ticket after I retire from talk radio. I'll run just once --- and just for the hell of it. I'll select the most qualified vice-presidential candidate possible just in case something strange happens and I win. After I'm sworn in I hang around long enough to sign an Executive Order requiring all airport screeners to have graduated in the top one-half of their high school class. Then I'll free all non-violent drug offenders, take a few spins on Air Force One and get to know the interns. Then I'll resign and let the vice president take the controls.

Yes, I am available for speaking engagements. And --- no. I'm not free. I'm a confirmed greedy capitalist.

That's enough of an introduction. There's also an FAQ page for those of you with nothing better to do.

Oh, by the way. I think that Bill Clinton was the most corrupt and dishonest President we have ever suffered through in this country during my lifetime. If I had to say something nice about him I would say that he is more honest than his wife, and cuter. Well, that's something, I guess.
 
Gents, I can't comment on the veracity of whether BG delivered this message at a commencement speech or not (have no idea, sounds like probably not), but I do know that he mentioned these rules at an internal senior product managers meeting at Microsoft in 2002 - I was there so I know first hand. I don't recall if he referenced/credited the original writer at the time - thinking back to it now I don't recall that he did.

I assumed he had delivered this message more broadly in more public forums based upon internet-based attribution to that effect - my error if not.

Again, I think the point is really the message and it's impact. It's great to hear a little common sense going up against all the namby pamby feel-good messages and themes which seem to overwhelm many of the more important and fundamental points and issues at the heart of many of today's hotly debate topics.
 
Back
Top