Gender equality, or stupidity?
- Thread starter Al Wohlstrom
- Start date
Jim Craik
Lifetime Supporter
Consevatives were also against Blacks in the Military and Gays in the Military.....
This is how many Consevatives feel about Women.........
Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, a tea party activist that’s appeared several times on Fox News, and founder of an organization where Sean Hannity serves as an advisory board member, said in a sermon recently published to YouTube that America’s greatest mistake was allowing women the right to vote, adding that back in “the good old days, men knew that women are crazy and they knew how to deal with them.”
In the video, published to YouTube in March, Peterson explains that he believes women simply can’t handle “anything,” and that in his experience, “You walk up to them with a issue, they freak out right away. They go nuts. They get mad. They get upset, just like that. They have no patience because it’s not in their nature. They don’t have love. They don’t have love.”
This is how many Consevatives feel about Women.........
Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, a tea party activist that’s appeared several times on Fox News, and founder of an organization where Sean Hannity serves as an advisory board member, said in a sermon recently published to YouTube that America’s greatest mistake was allowing women the right to vote, adding that back in “the good old days, men knew that women are crazy and they knew how to deal with them.”
In the video, published to YouTube in March, Peterson explains that he believes women simply can’t handle “anything,” and that in his experience, “You walk up to them with a issue, they freak out right away. They go nuts. They get mad. They get upset, just like that. They have no patience because it’s not in their nature. They don’t have love. They don’t have love.”
Last edited:
Jim Craik
Lifetime Supporter
The Right can no longer win elections without finding ways to cheat, limiting who can vote, when they can vote and of course gerrymendering.........
But all that Un-American activity is not enough, they still can't win.......
The Consevatives have forced through all these anti women, anti poor anti immegrent laws and then wonder why they cant win elections.
Now they have finally figured out that in order to win they must also stop women from voting....
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Women Should Not be Allowed to Vote
It was single women who overwhelmingly voted for Obama and helped put him into office. By the way, when he was voted in, I thought, "We've crossed the Rubicon. He's going to be the worst President the U.S. has ever had. We've crossed the line to destruction, and we cannot go back." And I've been right.
I have a hard time understanding the minds of some people, but most especially dumb ones (one of my friends told me, "The smart understand the stupid a lot more than the stupid understand the smart"). When it comes to government, they seem to think it has its own money to dole out. Or else "the rich" have trillions and trillions and trillions of dollars and all we have to do is take it from them and spread it around equally. Then things will be better, lots better.
My experience has been a lot of women are natural socialists/fascists and don't know it. When you tell them that's what they are, they don't believe it. For one thing they don't exactly know what a socialist or fascist is.Of all the women I've met I've never seen one who truly understood economics or political science. I've met a lot who think they do, but don't. I know there are some who understand both, but they are the proverbial needle in a haystack.
But all that Un-American activity is not enough, they still can't win.......
The Consevatives have forced through all these anti women, anti poor anti immegrent laws and then wonder why they cant win elections.
Now they have finally figured out that in order to win they must also stop women from voting....
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Women Should Not be Allowed to Vote
It was single women who overwhelmingly voted for Obama and helped put him into office. By the way, when he was voted in, I thought, "We've crossed the Rubicon. He's going to be the worst President the U.S. has ever had. We've crossed the line to destruction, and we cannot go back." And I've been right.
I have a hard time understanding the minds of some people, but most especially dumb ones (one of my friends told me, "The smart understand the stupid a lot more than the stupid understand the smart"). When it comes to government, they seem to think it has its own money to dole out. Or else "the rich" have trillions and trillions and trillions of dollars and all we have to do is take it from them and spread it around equally. Then things will be better, lots better.
My experience has been a lot of women are natural socialists/fascists and don't know it. When you tell them that's what they are, they don't believe it. For one thing they don't exactly know what a socialist or fascist is.Of all the women I've met I've never seen one who truly understood economics or political science. I've met a lot who think they do, but don't. I know there are some who understand both, but they are the proverbial needle in a haystack.
Pat
Supporter
Stereotyping a bit there eh Jim?
There is certainly a liberal view on suffrage.
Why White Men Shouldn't Vote
Would you let your daughter go to war??
Girls should be girls like below and not grovelling around in a hell hole being shot at.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dZLLPaX4SS4
Pete McCluskey.
Lifetime Supporter
How come every fucking post on this forum becomes a shit fight between liberals and conservatives? There is absolutely no need to politicise this important question.:furious:
From what I have read the Israeli Sheila's do all right in the front line.
And I have seen grown men shit their pants and run and hide and cry for their mum when the shit hits the fan.So I think it depends on the individual.
Personally I think men are more suited in build and stature than women generally speaking when it comes to combat. Also it is inherent in men to worry about even the most competent of women falling into enemy hands, not a good scenario when one should have full concentration on the job at hand.
Definitely Physical standards should not be dropped or modified to allow women into combat units.
From what I have read the Israeli Sheila's do all right in the front line.
And I have seen grown men shit their pants and run and hide and cry for their mum when the shit hits the fan.So I think it depends on the individual.
Personally I think men are more suited in build and stature than women generally speaking when it comes to combat. Also it is inherent in men to worry about even the most competent of women falling into enemy hands, not a good scenario when one should have full concentration on the job at hand.
Definitely Physical standards should not be dropped or modified to allow women into combat units.
Last edited:
Jim Craik
Lifetime Supporter
How come every fucking post on this forum becomes a shit fight between liberals and conservatives? There is absolutely no need to politicise this important question.:furiousosted by Pete
Pete, Jack,
From your statement is obvious that you did not read Al post, because if you had you would see that this is not a discussion about an important question....
Unfortunatly Al is not looking for a discussion, this is just like all of Als posts, it's a hit peice attacking the left.
Here are just a few quotes from Als article:
→
Let us send our daughters to die in battle for the sake of gender neutrality!
There are three different types of ideas: good ideas, bad ideas, and ideas so horrifically stupid that they will be mocked and scorned by our descendants for centuries to come.
Modern left-wingers typically trade in the second sort of idea, while occasionally conjuring up something that unquestionably falls into the third category.
Here we have a horrible idea, stacked on top of a bewilderingly idiotic idea, poured over a collection of reckless, ideologically-fueled, irrational, liberal feminist ideas. Basically, an insane idea had sexual relations with a moronic idea and the two gave birth to this idea.
I disagree that we should get people killed just so that pushy liberals can feel like they’ve won some sort of bizarre moral victory.
**********
Yes Pete, if this was a discussion about women in the military then I would agree with you, but this is just another of a long line of one sided hit peiced posted by Al.
I have said it before and I'll say it again........
I have promised to never start one sided, divisive, political hit peices.
If you do not start one sided hit peices, you will hear nothing from me.
But if Al or anyone else posts this type of crap......
****************
Pete, if Al had just asked the question, should women be in combat....
Then we could have a discussion, but when he posts this kind of crap, expect as you say:
"a shit fight between liberals and conservatives"
Last edited:
I did not take the connotation of left vs. right with this one. Whenever standards are lowered to allow less able persons (not gender specific here) to qualify for specific tasks
requiring a higher standard, we all loose. So Women in the combat roles, no for me.
If they can meet the higher standard, fine. If not, and we lower those standards, no.
IMO the current military basic training does not come close to what may be required in combat situations. In some specialties, yes, but this would come after BMT.
requiring a higher standard, we all loose. So Women in the combat roles, no for me.
If they can meet the higher standard, fine. If not, and we lower those standards, no.
IMO the current military basic training does not come close to what may be required in combat situations. In some specialties, yes, but this would come after BMT.
Jim Craik
Lifetime Supporter
Jack,
Are you saying that you read Al article and after reading it you say......
"I did not take the connotation of left vs. right with this one"
So Jack you read things like.....
There are three different types of ideas: good ideas, bad ideas, and ideas so horrifically stupid that they will be mocked and scorned by our descendants for centuries to come.
Modern left-wingers typically trade in the second sort of idea, while occasionally conjuring up something that unquestionably falls into the third category.
Here we have a horrible idea, stacked on top of a bewilderingly idiotic idea, poured over a collection of reckless, ideologically-fueled, irrational, liberal feminist ideas. Basically, an insane idea had sexual relations with a moronic idea and the two gave birth to this idea.
I disagree that we should get people killed just so that pushy liberals can feel like they’ve won some sort of bizarre moral victory.
***************
Jack, you read those words and did not notice any "connotation of left vs. right".
You saw that article as a fair and balanced look at the important question about Women and combat?
Really?
Are you saying that you read Al article and after reading it you say......
"I did not take the connotation of left vs. right with this one"
So Jack you read things like.....
There are three different types of ideas: good ideas, bad ideas, and ideas so horrifically stupid that they will be mocked and scorned by our descendants for centuries to come.
Modern left-wingers typically trade in the second sort of idea, while occasionally conjuring up something that unquestionably falls into the third category.
Here we have a horrible idea, stacked on top of a bewilderingly idiotic idea, poured over a collection of reckless, ideologically-fueled, irrational, liberal feminist ideas. Basically, an insane idea had sexual relations with a moronic idea and the two gave birth to this idea.
I disagree that we should get people killed just so that pushy liberals can feel like they’ve won some sort of bizarre moral victory.
***************
Jack, you read those words and did not notice any "connotation of left vs. right".
You saw that article as a fair and balanced look at the important question about Women and combat?
Really?
Last edited:
Alright Jim. I did not respond with the left vs. right connotation. I merely voiced my opinion about if women should be allowed into combat roles.
No liberal vs. conservative argument is ever won in la la land. The Paddock has proven this time and again. There is no fair and balanced debate, simply attacks and accusations as you well know.
Still looking forward to buying you lunch this month...
No liberal vs. conservative argument is ever won in la la land. The Paddock has proven this time and again. There is no fair and balanced debate, simply attacks and accusations as you well know.
Still looking forward to buying you lunch this month...
I posted this to get an opinion, pro vs con. Every post presents a chance for Jim to piss and moan about the past and the evil right . I'm surprised that it isn't racist on my part, there is time though.
Jim Craik
Lifetime Supporter
Al if you really want a discussion then have a discussion, this type of post does nothing but stir up trouble and you know it!
Starting a thread with the title...........
"Gender equality, or stupidity?
Then post a poorly written hit peice, you are not looking for "opinion, pro vs con" you are just attacking the left...
But then thats the same with all your posts.
Starting a thread with the title...........
"Gender equality, or stupidity?
Then post a poorly written hit peice, you are not looking for "opinion, pro vs con" you are just attacking the left...
But then thats the same with all your posts.
Last edited:
Similar threads
