GT40s.com
MK-I  MK-II  MK-III  MK-IV  GULF  MIRAGE  J-CAR  LOLA
GT40s.com
Home Forum Gallery Support GT40s.com  
Register FAQ Advertisers Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   GT40s.com > >

Notices

The Paddock Enter at your own risk.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13th April 2018, 11:40 AM   #2921
Larry L.
Lifetime Premier Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Washington St.
GT40: none. YET.
Posts: 2,540
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffYoung View Post
Facts.

Not next, end of story.

'Very lame 'rebuttal'.

Next...
Larry L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2018, 12:56 PM   #2922
Rod
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock
Rookie
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 80
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Drumpf keeps nominating incompetent boobs to serve as judges, do you remember this “genius”?

Trump judicial nominee can’t answer basic questions - YouTube

The guy couldn’t answer basic questions of the law.

Here’s a Drumpf judicial nominee that refuses to answer whether Brown vs. the Board of Education (separate schools for races) was a correct decision.

These are just two examples, but there are plenty more, of why Democrats refuse to approve Drumpf’s judicial nominees. They’re ignoramuses.
RodKnock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2018, 12:57 PM   #2923
Rod
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock
Rookie
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 80
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Forgot link:

Trump judicial nominee refuses to say if landmark civil rights opinion was correctly decided - CNNPolitics
RodKnock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2018, 01:05 PM   #2924
Rod
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock
Rookie
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 80
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Here’s what I’m hoping for. Democrats take over the Senate and House, a SCOTUS member retires and then the Democrats stall Drumpf’s nomination for 2 years until a Democrat wins the White House in 2020. I’d love it! Payback would be sweet.

Comey thinks the Russian “Pee Pee” tape exists, so I’m hoping between Cohen’s recorded tapes from his office and the Pee Pee tape, Drumpf will be long gone by 2020. And Democrats are stalling Pence’s nominee.
RodKnock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2018, 02:21 PM   #2925
Larry L.
Lifetime Premier Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Washington St.
GT40: none. YET.
Posts: 2,540
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by YerDugliness View Post

About Trump's confirmations...they're probably being held up for good reason.

Doug
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry L. View Post
...really? What was the "good reason" for stonewalling Gorsuch?

'Guess no one can come up with a "good reason"...'just had the desire to extract partisan revenge at Gorsuch's expense over the GOP's decision to implement the Democrats' OWN "Biden Rule" vis-ŗ-vis Garland.

Sooooooooo, I'm now going to 'bag' this and go meet a buddy for lunch...
Larry L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2018, 07:50 PM   #2926
Rod
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock
Rookie
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 80
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Depends on what your definition of what “good” means. He’s better than most, if not all, of the idiots that Drumpf has nominated for various judgeships. In that sense, there isn’t a “good”reason for filibustering his nomination other than Garland was screwed.

However, Gorsuch did have the controversial “Hobby Lobby” decision, which to Democrats, is VERY worrisome and would be enough to “stonewall” his nomination.
RodKnock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2018, 10:11 PM   #2927
Larry L.
Lifetime Premier Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Washington St.
GT40: none. YET.
Posts: 2,540
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock View Post
These are just two examples...of why Democrats refuse to approve Drumpf’s judicial nominees. They’re ignoramuses.
No. When you boil it all down, for Democrats the disqualifying factor is the fact Trump's nominees are NOT far left liberals. NO conservative nominee for ANY position will ever pass muster in the left's book.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock View Post
Depends on what your definition of what “good” means.
Like what the meaning of "is" is...

Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock View Post
...there isn’t a “good”reason for filibustering his nomination other than Garland was screwed.
Garland or any OTHER person having been passed over changes N-O-T-H-I-N-G with regard to whether Gorsuch's qulifications / credentials (or those of anyone ELSE) are stellar enough for him to be confirmed or not. The former is NOT relevant to/has no bearing ON/changes nothing REGARDING the latter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock View Post
...However, Gorsuch did have the controversial “Hobby Lobby” decision, which to Democrats, is VERY worrisome and would be enough to “stonewall” his nomination.
There you go right there. THERE'S the big diff between a "qualified" justice and an "unqualified" one in the eyes of liberals. Gorsuch decided BASED ON THE WORDING OF THE CONSTITUTION as opposed to deciding CONTRARY to 'same thru the imposition/implementation/use of the judicial tool of "interpretation". Democrats HATE that.

G'night all -
Larry L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2018, 12:23 AM   #2928
Rod
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock
Rookie
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 80
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry L. View Post
No. When you boil it all down, for Democrats the disqualifying factor is the fact Trump's nominees are NOT far left liberals. NO conservative nominee for ANY position will ever pass muster in the left's book.



Like what the meaning of "is" is...



Garland or any OTHER person having been passed over changes N-O-T-H-I-N-G with regard to whether Gorsuch's qulifications / credentials (or those of anyone ELSE) are stellar enough for him to be confirmed or not. The former is NOT relevant to/has no bearing ON/changes nothing REGARDING the latter.



There you go right there. THERE'S the big diff between a "qualified" justice and an "unqualified" one in the eyes of liberals. Gorsuch decided BASED ON THE WORDING OF THE CONSTITUTION as opposed to deciding CONTRARY to 'same thru the imposition/implementation/use of the judicial tool of "interpretation". Democrats HATE that.

G'night all -
Did you watch the video of the Drumpf nominee who had never tried a case, never given a deposition and didnít know basic concepts of law. Heís but one example of the dummies being nominated by the idiot in chief.

I knew I could lead you into a Bill Clinton reference. So easy.

Iím not a lawyer, Iíll leave it for Jeff to chime in on the Hobby Lobby case, if he desires, and whether Gorsuch followed the wording of the Constitution. I know youíre not a Constitutional lawyer, so your opinion of the law is worth absolutely nothing. Your original question was why Democrats stonewalled Gorsuch and I answered it. Democrats felt they had ďgood reasonĒ to stonewall on the merits of his case decisions.

In any event, Republicans went to a simple majority to approve Gorsuch, which is fine by me, since Democrats will eventually take the Senate and House. Maybe not 2018, maybe not 2020, but the future of the US Congress will be more female and more people of color. Not a bunch of mostly old white men.
RodKnock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2018, 07:59 PM   #2929
Al Wohlstrom's Avatar
Al Wohlstrom
I Have No Life
United States
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
GT40: RCR SLC LS7 Ric
Posts: 2,239
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by YerDugliness View Post
Michael Cohenís office raided by Feds earlier today. No news yet on what kind of search/siezure it was...but the name Robert Mueller was associated with the request for the warrant.

Itís about to get very interesting!

Doug
Lawyer client????????????? privilege information????????? Sounds like someone from law broke the law.
__________________
Al
Buy American!
Al Wohlstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2018, 12:55 AM   #2930
JeffYoung
10 tenths
United States
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
GT40: MOPAR Bisches
Posts: 1,810
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Wohlstrom View Post
Lawyer client????????????? privilege information????????? Sounds like someone from law broke the law.
Are you really this uninformed? And you are allowed to vote?

A Republican special counsel determined that he had probable cause Michael Cohen has committed crimes unrelated to the Russia investigation. He referred that information to the Republican US attorney for the Southern District of New York. That attorney decided there was enough evidence of a crime, and the potential that evidence was being destroyed, to seek a warrant to search Cohen's offices and home. That US attorney's decision was approved by the Republican-appointed leadership of the United States Justice Department.

Then, that information was used to convince a United States district court judge, appointed for life and hopefully apolitical, to issue the warrant and allow the search.

For you to flippantly refer to all of the above as "the law breaking the law" shows a complete lack of disrespect for our systems, our history, our Constitution, the judiciary, and the Department of Justice. Nice job.

And simple answer: the attorney-client privilege does not apply to evidence of crimes. There is a crime/fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege.

You should refrain from voting from this point forward due to lack of understanding of basic issues that a citizen should understand.
JeffYoung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2018, 12:48 PM   #2931
Rod
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock
Rookie
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 80
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffYoung View Post
You should refrain from voting from this point forward due to lack of understanding of basic issues that a citizen should understand.
More importantly, can we take Walt's gun away too.
RodKnock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2018, 01:49 PM   #2932
Larry L.
Lifetime Premier Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Washington St.
GT40: none. YET.
Posts: 2,540
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffYoung View Post
...Are you really this uninformed? And you are allowed to vote?...You should refrain from voting from this point forward due to lack of understanding of basic issues that a citizen should understand.
I have to assume, then, that you've never seen any of the 'man/woman-in-the-street' interviews with liberals wherein their lack of even the basic understanding/knowledge about which candidate did or did not say this-or-that regarding various issues were showcased?

Take this little dandy wherein they AGREE with Billary's imaginary/totally made up campaign platform to repeal the Bill of Rights, for instance:

These Hillary Supporters Want Her to Repeal the Bill of Rights if She's Elected President - YouTube

Or how about this little gem wherein they back Billary's imaginary platform to impose Sharia Law:

Hillary Supporters Endorse SHARIA LAW in AMERICA! - YouTube

Jus' sayin'...

Last edited by Larry L.; 16th April 2018 at 02:20 PM. Reason: can't spell worth beans...
Larry L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2018, 02:25 PM   #2933
Rod
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock
Rookie
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 80
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry L. View Post
I have to assume you've never seen any of the 'man/woman-in-the-street' interviews with liberals wherein their lack of even the basic understanding/knowledge about which candidate did or did not say this-or-that regarding various issues were showcased?

Take this little dandy wherein they AGREE with Billary's imaginary/totally made up campaign platform to repeal the Bill of Rights, for instance:

These Hillary Supporters Want Her to Repeal the Bill of Rights if She's Elected President - YouTube

Jus' sayin'...
So, now you're comparing Walt to some dummies that were "found" on the street? If I were Walt, I'd be insulted.

There are a lot of dummies in this world, including the one occupying the White House.

BTW, back to Michael Cohen and him allegedly being a lawyer. He paid hush money to porn stars and Playboy Playmates and has a reputation as a "fixer" for Trump. That's why the Feds are asking Cohen for a client list. Trump may be his only client. Thus, Mueller and his team could argue, and maybe they are, that Cohen is not actually a lawyer.
RodKnock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2018, 04:09 PM   #2934
Rod
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock
Rookie
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 80
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Cohen has three (3) clients and the "secret" client is Sean Hannity. And Hannity claims he has never been represented, never paid a legal bill, by Cohen.

This can't get much better.
RodKnock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2018, 04:29 PM   #2935
SwiftDB4
6 Tenths
United States
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WA,USA
GT40: SPF P2226
Posts: 698
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Also notice Dotard blocked additional Russian sanctions announced by Nikki Haley? Putie must have called and threatened pee pee tapes again!
SwiftDB4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2018, 04:34 PM   #2936
Rod
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock
Rookie
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 80
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Funny, according to Comey, all Drumpf could talk about with him in the room were the "Golden Shower" tape and his inaugural crowd size. With Drumpf, it's always about some Freudian "penis measurement" thing.
RodKnock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2018, 04:52 PM   #2937
Larry L.
Lifetime Premier Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Washington St.
GT40: none. YET.
Posts: 2,540
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock View Post
So, now you're comparing Walt to some dummies that were "found" on the street?

Once again you've chosen to conveniently miss/ignore the obvious point.
Larry L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2018, 05:21 PM   #2938
Rod
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock
Rookie
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 80
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry L. View Post
Once again you've chosen to conveniently miss/ignore the obvious point.
So you copied my reply and missed the

Talk about missing the point, or in this case, the humor.

Back to the Comey interview, so the big news is that Comey said Drumpf is "morally unfit" to be President. That's the big news? Reaaly? We already know he's morally unfit for the office and not "tethered to the truth" (i.e., a liar).

Come on. That's not news.
RodKnock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2018, 11:15 AM   #2939
YerDugliness's Avatar
YerDugliness
Lifetime Premier Supporter
United States
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SW Kansas
GT40: 1/24 scale MKII
Posts: 2,280
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock View Post
So you copied my reply and missed the

Talk about missing the point, or in this case, the humor.
Rod, I have not found the ultra-conservative crowd to have much of a sense of humor...just my observation...

Cheers!

Doug
__________________
YD,E./PNB
Alís RIGHT...Buy American!!!
Retired twice, now back at work, but still attempting to age disgracefully
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
YerDugliness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2018, 03:09 PM   #2940
Rod
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock
Rookie
United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 80
Re: GT40s.com Paddock Politics Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by YerDugliness View Post
Rod, I have not found the ultra-conservative crowd to have much of a sense of humor...just my observation...

Cheers!

Doug
Do you think the Drumpfians will have a sense humor when the "Golden Shower" pee pee tape is released?

Personally, I think the tape should be released to public, since I'm tired of Drumpf not doing his job when he delays or rescinds every sanction on Russia. He's obviously being blackmailed by Russia. The sooner the "Golden Shower" tape is released the better for the country.
RodKnock is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:10 AM.