How small is the SLC, pictures?

I was wondering if you guys have any side by side pictures with other sport/exotic cars to post. On some pictures I see car appears very small. Does it look like that in person? I see the dimensions are pretty normal, it has to be the overall design that's playing games with my mind. :idea2:
 

Joel K

Supporter
IMO the car is not small at 105” wheelbase, but it is very low compared to other mass produced sports cars at 43” tall, here are some good pics from AJ’s Build showing his SLC parked near a Corvette and Porsche...

A.J.'s SL-C build thread
 

PeteB

GT40s Supporter
SL-C and a Lotus Elise:
uF0FqiM.jpg


SL-C and a Corvette:
F4UBjHR.jpg


SL-C in a den of Cobras:
19424295_335167553570339_6732666132004179327_n.jpg


Next to a '50s Ford wagon:
13417573_139415606478869_5372149688256383668_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
We have a Lotus Evora. The SLC is noticeably shorter, but the SLC is wider in the cabin. In race gear, my son and are are CRAMMED into the Lotus (and this is the 'big' Lotus). The SLC is OK.

I think the SLC is easier to get in/out of. But that is largely based on how well your body bends in different places...

In person, the car looks large as it is fairly wide/long and being so low tends to make it look wider/longer.
 
SL-C is definitely compact - but it doesn't look it, unless you are side by side with other cars.

You can see how she fares up against an R8 and a GT4, both which are fairly small cars already.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8148.jpg
    IMG_8148.jpg
    81.8 KB · Views: 672
  • IMG_8131.jpg
    IMG_8131.jpg
    132.8 KB · Views: 658
  • IMG_3962.jpg
    IMG_3962.jpg
    103.7 KB · Views: 566
It seems its all about the angle. First picture looks bigger then rest, second picture with the straight shot looks smaller. Angel I believe I sent you a message on F chat.
 
Back
Top