To all Veterans everywhere. LEST WE FORGET.
Amen.
('Wish y'all could have seen the tribute to vets that Wayne Newton put on during his show in 'Vegas a couple years back. It was just...stunning.)
To all Veterans everywhere. LEST WE FORGET.
Say Jack, thats quite a statement, as I understand there have been a good number of fairly high ranking officers removed from office.
So you have been told that these Generals/Admirals were removed by President Obama for no reason except that President Obama wanted them gone?
Now I could be wrong, but it looks to me like these high ranking leaders were removed for cause and that President Obama had nothing to do with it.
Jim, over the past three years, it is unprecedented for the number of four-star generals to be relieved of duty, and not necessarily relieved for cause. Many have simply retired.
So far in this administration, there have been 197 flag officers removed (some have it at over 200) and countless more given bad efficiency reports blocking any future chance of promotion. This number is unprecedented for the time frame involved. Most have been sacked with the reasons given as "loss of confidence" which is code for we just want you out or "allegations of inappropriate judgment" code for you did something we disagreed with. Some have specific "allegations of misconduct" from unnamed sources are tied to the press releases. That's certainly powerful and intimidating stuff and if the allegation proven false, the career is still ruined and the record in the media never corrected. I served three tours as an Inspector General and while I certainly was involved in many, many investigations the public release of "unnamed source" allegations of wrongdoing is, like the number of reliefs, unprecedented in my experience. In fact MOST of the allegations are never substantiated. In fiscal year 2011, when 125 senior officers and officials were investigated for misconduct only 18 cases were substantiated.
In reality, often the mistake made is of public criticism of the administration. For example, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal was relieved in 2010 of his command of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan due to what has been described as unflattering remarks made off the record by an unnamed aide about Vice President Joe Biden and other administration officials in a Rolling Stone magazine article. The comment was allegedly made at McChrystal's 33rd wedding anniversary at a Paris bar. For the record, a Pentagon inquiry into the magazine's profile cleared McChrystal of wrongdoing and called into question the accuracy of the June 2010 story.
Army Gen. Carter Ham, who commanded U.S. African Command when the consulate was attacked and four Americans were killed, was highly critical of the decision by the State Department not to send in reinforcements.
Another flag officer involved in the Benghazi events was Rear Adm. Charles Gaouette. He commanded the Carrier Strike Group. He contends aircraft could have been sent to Libya in time to help the Americans under fire. A Navy official familiar with the circumstances of the investigation said it involved allegations of “inappropriate leadership judgment” and stressed it was not related to personal conduct. Later "unnamed sources" say he was removed from his post for alleged profanity, making derisive comments about a leader in the Navy and making “racially insensitive comments" -whatever that may mean.
Profanity???? You get fired for profanity???? (After the Benghazi scandal Hillary Clinton's aide, Philippe Reinestold, a reporter he "should “F**k Off” and “Have a good life.” Wonder what happened to him.) But I digress...
Army Major Gen. Ralph Baker was the commander of the Combined Joint Task Force Horn of Africa at Camp Lemonier in Djibouti, Africa. Baker contended that attack helicopters could have reached the consulate in time on the night of the attack. Relieved for "loss of confidence in his ability to command,”
Ironically, there seems to be a far gentler treatment of those in the administration responsible for the Fast and Furious, NSA, IRS targeting, AP reporter monitoring, and the unhappy rollout of the ACA website. While nine military officers have been relieved related to the Benghazi murders there have been no civilian dismissals related to the event.
It is clear that there is a striking alignment of those that had the temerity to disagree with the rules of engagement put in place in Afghanistan, the selection of the Pentagon Sequester cuts, the administrations posture on Iran, the repeal of don't ask, don't tell, and the softening of the physical standards of certain front line combat specialties and SCCs - "sudden career conclusions". The old "don't ask-don't tell had apparently been replaced by a new one with a very different meaning. The military should never tolerate personal or professional misconduct and certainly some of those relieved were done with sound justification. For them, good riddance. My concern is that if we get to the point that political correctness gets in the way of common sense and combat readiness suffers because of a lack of candor we are going the wrong way...
At last count, there were 919 active duty flag officers (Generals, Admirals etc.) in the U.S. military and 200 of them have been relieved that's over 20%.
If you were in the Pentagon wearing a star or two, what would you think?
For further reading, GOOGLE "kara hultgreen"
A village in Kenya called. They want their idiot back.





Thanks Pat, thats kind of what I thought.
Yes the buck stops with President Obama, thats how it always has been.
So now we have President Obama personally firing one, General S McChrystal.
Additionally, I'm sure that had he not resigned General McChrystal would have been replaced, but according to Fox, Gen McChrystal resigned.
So up to this point, except for being the Commander in Chief, there is no evidence that President Obama was personaly involved in firing 200 Flag Officers, in fact we don't have him personaly firing anyone.
I'm glad we could set the record straight
Pat, I'll see you in January!