Chuck's Jaguar D Type Build

Ian Anderson

Lifetime Supporter
1) Always remove church key before starting the machine, if not it will A) fling itself across the workshop and damage something or someone, B) trash itself on the rest of the machine C) trash the bed of the machine (I have seen all 3)
wear tight fitting sleeves a friend had his arm pulled into the cutting tool when it caught his overalls sleeve.

ian
 
I second absolutly Ian !!!!!!! be very very very carefull at beginning to use those
Lathe and Mill can be a pleasure to use but a disaster if you are not aware of all those small tricks to avoid very bad and dangerous situation
Yo need to consider those machines same way you consider your electric saw disc !!!!
Remember too ; do not think to be able to machine "threads " after only few practice , it is one of the most difficult and dangerous process yo u
will have to learn ( lot of gears set up , tooling prep and set up etc etc )
Do not think to succeed immediatly in doing tight tolerances ( bearing housing or watever shaft outside tolerance ) ; limit your use for some monthes in doing busches, spacers and easy parts
Those advises are only for you not to be disapointed with the first results and also doing simple parts you will be alwways concentrated into"security"
Your hands , your eyes are more important than trying to machine a long complicated part to save money in stade to have it done by aworkshop

Machining is like Tig welding ; few by few you will learn more and more and get skilled
 

Markus

SPRF40
Lifetime Supporter
1) Always remove church key before starting the machine, if not it will A) fling itself across the workshop and damage something or someone, B) trash itself on the rest of the machine C) trash the bed of the machine (I have seen all 3)
wear tight fitting sleeves a friend had his arm pulled into the cutting tool when it caught his overalls sleeve.

ian

I agree to this.....
During my 3 year apprenticeship we used to have frequent chuck wrench wide throwing contests until that one day..... when the perfectly accelerated chuck wrench flew off the lathe in the perfect angle and left the building through the closed window only to land directly in front of our trainer on his way back to the training center.....

After we caught hell we did not have another contest........

A good solution is to use a spring loaded chuck wrench like this
 

Chris Kouba

Supporter
Can't agree more with all the above, especially about the chuck key. Epoxy a magnet somewhere safe and make sure it's either there or in your hand at all times, just like I do.

Whoops...

That's actually something I've always meant to do. Maybe typing this will make me actually do it now. I can neither confirm nor deny that a chuck key may have flung across the shop at some point. The spring loaded chuck looks pretty idiot-proof too.
 

Joel K

Supporter
I have the mini mill from harbor freight and just jumped right in milling small aluminum parts For RC cars. For what we do I would recommend something more powerful and sturdier, but it’s surprising what you can do with one of these machines.

Turned out it has been invaluable on my SLC build. It’s the part of the build I enjoy most. Designing and milling parts. It takes a while to get the hang of it. The best advice is to just practice on simple parts. I like to mill aluminum with a 4 flute 1/4” mill at 1000 RPMs and use cutting fluid. Take very little off at a time and you will get the hang of it.
 
Last edited:
Question: are there any good basic references for getting started with a mill / lathe? Perhaps a 'Milling for Dummies' sort of book? Looking for some basic guidance such as RPMs used with different material, blade / bit set up, and the like. Not too technical. I have watched a ton of videos, but a paper reference would be nice. Michel's good suggestions above are the sort of basics I hope to explore.

A good book to refer to is the Machinists' Ready Reference. that is what I was using when I was a machinist back in the 80s, when we still had to do things by hand. I have the 2nd or 3rd edition, They are up to at lest the Tenth. It has all the numbers and calculations you will need on your venture.

Here is the Amazon link. Check around as I am sure it can be found for much less elsewhere.
 

Chuck

Supporter
A good book to refer to is the Machinists' Ready Reference. that is what I was using when I was a machinist back in the 80s, when we still had to do things by hand. I have the 2nd or 3rd edition, They are up to at lest the Tenth. It has all the numbers and calculations you will need on your venture.

Here is the Amazon link. Check around as I am sure it can be found for much less elsewhere.
Thanks for the tip. That looks like a rather detailed reference source.
 

Chuck

Supporter
Rear Sub Frame, Part IV

It has been more than a year since this topic was discussed. When we last posted we noted that “the aft end of the secondary frame / fuel tank supports will be connected to the rear brackets inside the boot area.” That is the job we have now tackled.

The length of the rear supports was determined with the body set in place and then two supports fabricated with the same materials used on the other parts, except ½” rather than 5/8” heim joints were used.

DSC_0068.JPG


Understanding how it goes together is clearer without the body in place. The body will be sandwiched between the two plates visible in this picture.

IMG_9694.jpg


For the present time a single bolt holds the two plates together. When the body work is started, the plates will be held with four 5/16” bolts to more closely match the original and the single bolt seen in the pictures will not be used.

DSC_0124.JPG


The external pieces were primed, painted with Eastwood Aluma Blast, and installed. When in place the height can be adjusted with the two inside tubes. The length of the frame can be adjusted fore and aft at the forward Heim joint connection to the tub. The position of the body can be tuned with these adjustments. It is amazing how much more sturdy the rear clip becomes with this sub frame in place.

IMG_9707.jpg


IMG_9704.jpg
 
Last edited:

Chuck

Supporter
Side Pipes and Body Revisited

A couple of months ago the construction of the side pipes was posted. Before that we lengthened the upper control arm Heims to address the excess camber. At the time these projects were done, the body was not in place. We recently did just that to see if the side pipes lined up and the front wheels had adequate turning clearance. The wheels have good clearance and the pipes location will work well.

IMG_9803.jpg


IMG_9811.jpg


This was another opportunity to revisit the overall proportions and consider possible revisions to the fiberglass. For example, I have mixed feelings about the height of the nose. It may be just a bit too high. With a bit of fiberglass work the nose could be lowered, still leaving clearance for the engine. I am wondering if anyone has any comments?

IMG_9801.jpg


IMG_9808.jpg


I am generally satisfied with the ride height and the overall way the body is setting but welcome any comments one how it might be improved.
 
Difficult to judge using photos shot near to the ground. A shot from head height would include all the great compound curves on the top of the front end. Looks super-cool.
 

Chet Zerlin

Supporter
Chuck,
It may just be the way it was photographed, but it looks to me like there is a little too much space between the front tire and the front fender.(?) Pics of original D-Types show a much tighter radius in that area. Of course that space might be necessary for clearance of the tire when turning...or it might just be the way that the unfinished aluminum shows up in front of the tire. Regardless a beautiful build! And I continue to be jealous :)
2-1565384586517.jpg
 

Chuck

Supporter
Chet:

Thanks for the comment. Closing up the front end so the daylight disappears will help. Also the front wheels on the original were set in significantly - far different than modern cars. Indeed the set back was greater than shown in the photos on my RCR even after I shortened the control arms. But unless you look at it from a near nose on angle the set back is not that apparent, which your photo of the short nose illustrates. Whether the fore and aft size of the opening can be closed a bit is a good point. I may look into closing that radius per your suggestion. Thanks.
 

Chris Kouba

Supporter
I would snap a pic from the same aspect as Chet's and see what it looks like when you compare them. I would be willing to bet it's the angle at which the photo was taken which exaggerates the size of the hole vs size of the tire. I actually think yours looks pretty good Chuck- and I'd bet no two cars were built the same back then anyway. Make it your own!

I will say, I'd give the D an "A" in both blue or red. They look fabulous!

PS - Did you get your mill and lathe yet?
 
Back
Top