flatchat(Chris)
Supporter
OK -- slow day at the office but I found it fascinating --- its quite lengthy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwCaZaSon9A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwCaZaSon9A
Our history is not what we think
- Thread starter flatchat
- Start date
Charlie Farley
Supporter
Chris,
Thanks for that. Watched it all.
Definately raises all sorts of questions.
Thanks for that. Watched it all.
Definately raises all sorts of questions.
flatchat(Chris)
Supporter
Best pack me bags in readiness for the second (as we know it) coming --every ~3600 years , seems to fall in place
Maybe our Aussie indigenous were right after all, when God said --"Don't do anything till I get back"
Maybe our Aussie indigenous were right after all, when God said --"Don't do anything till I get back"
Glad it wasn't just me John!
Methinks someone speeded it up to get it under 1hr (You Tube limit?), but everything was lost in translation. I got the ass with it and nearly decked my new AIO computer :shocked:
Glad I didn't, just cost me a grand...
AS for the content, well I suppose it all depends on who's version of history you want to believe. The problem is, these pieces often don't solve puzzles, they raise conjecture and attempt to overturn the established understanding (for whatever motivation), and the problem with THAT is that if you find a your beliefs undermined often enough by a clever bit of chicanery, then insecurity follows. If the exercise is carried out often enough across a broad spectrum of historical and political history, then society itself can be destabilised, and to a degree, I believe that is happening now in the West.
However, not all modern exposes of history re-examined are bunk, and we have to rely on a heightened ability to disseminate such information which in turn relies on a decent standard of education carried out by people who themselves benefit from such attributes.
Oh dear. Another Oooops! moment then...:thumbsdown:
Methinks someone speeded it up to get it under 1hr (You Tube limit?), but everything was lost in translation. I got the ass with it and nearly decked my new AIO computer :shocked:
Glad I didn't, just cost me a grand...
AS for the content, well I suppose it all depends on who's version of history you want to believe. The problem is, these pieces often don't solve puzzles, they raise conjecture and attempt to overturn the established understanding (for whatever motivation), and the problem with THAT is that if you find a your beliefs undermined often enough by a clever bit of chicanery, then insecurity follows. If the exercise is carried out often enough across a broad spectrum of historical and political history, then society itself can be destabilised, and to a degree, I believe that is happening now in the West.
However, not all modern exposes of history re-examined are bunk, and we have to rely on a heightened ability to disseminate such information which in turn relies on a decent standard of education carried out by people who themselves benefit from such attributes.
Oh dear. Another Oooops! moment then...:thumbsdown:
