GT40s.com - View Single Post

Gregg · 02-29-08, 07:30 PM

Falli, I believe you are wrong. I am on the way out and will try to elaborate later, but I will leave you with these questions.

1. Wouldn't the soldiers have to be proven wrong in order to compensate the Saadi's? If the soldiers were right, then no compensation to the Saadi's.

2. Wouldn't the soldiers have to be wrong in theory to allow the institution of a suit? Since when can a civilian sue the government for military action? I would think there would be some type of "exemption" just like Judges can't be personally held accountable for their mistakes/rulings.

02-29-08, 07:30 PM	#30 (permalink)
Gregg Lifetime Premier Supporter Join Date: Jul 2002 GT40: New York Posts: 723 Rep Power: 15	Re: Biting the hand that feeds you/shot you. Falli, I believe you are wrong. I am on the way out and will try to elaborate later, but I will leave you with these questions. 1. Wouldn't the soldiers have to be proven wrong in order to compensate the Saadi's? If the soldiers were right, then no compensation to the Saadi's. 2. Wouldn't the soldiers have to be wrong in theory to allow the institution of a suit? Since when can a civilian sue the government for military action? I would think there would be some type of "exemption" just like Judges can't be personally held accountable for their mistakes/rulings.