Where do you draw the line with an "accurate restoration"? It should be strictly up to the owner, after all, he's the one paying the freight.
Granted, 1076 might as well be a new car, but
the "before shots" of the chassis show major structural problems. Should the restorer have left every other tank sponson frame as was,etc, in order to maintain the original historical provenance of the car, yet sacrifice safety?
Or should he replace everything necessary to
preserve the car, using exact specs and the same materials, that will keep the car from rusting into oblivion in a garage somewhere?
Or maybe just spray the car inside and out with 40 year old paint?
IMHO, it is still the same beautiful car, with the same history. I'm glad to see that the owner was willing to go to such great expense to have it done.