Gentlemen,
I am about to take the Renault transaxle out of my GTD to change the final drive ratio and install a long fifth gear.
Before rebuilding the box, I had intended to send the bell housing and castings for bead blasting, to remove all the external black paint, then to have them painted silver and baked.
I was telling this to a friend, who until recently was a tribologist and metallurgist, working for a well-known bearing manufacturer. He went nuts. He said that he had had to provide evidence in an investigation into why a customer-rebuilder's gearboxes frequently failed after very few miles. He discovered pieces of aluminium oxide embedded in plain-bearing surfaces, which had scoured the journals, and had done very similar things to roller-bearing tracks, synchro rings and other bearing surfaces. The particles were residues left behind when the castings had been cosmetically bead blasted during the rebuild process. He went on to emphasise the importance (if such were necessary!) of getting ALL residue out of the castings before reassembly. Because residue particles are often thicker than the oil film, bead blasting, he said, was absolute anathema to clean reassembly.
This has left me in a quandary. How can I check that the residue is excluded from before, and has been properly removed after, bead blasting? Should I give up the idea and leave the gearbox halves and bell housing in their (clean) black paint? Just do the rebuild, safe in the knowledge that the box won't wear out in a very short distance, for that reason, anyway?
My question to forum members is this. If you have had experience of bead blasting, either as a service-provider or as a customer, what precautions are necessary to protect the casting internals from aluminium oxide? What should I ensure is done to be certain that the inside of the box is completely clean afterwards? Should I have the blasting done at all?
Any advice or experiences would be very welcome.
Thank you.
I am about to take the Renault transaxle out of my GTD to change the final drive ratio and install a long fifth gear.
Before rebuilding the box, I had intended to send the bell housing and castings for bead blasting, to remove all the external black paint, then to have them painted silver and baked.
I was telling this to a friend, who until recently was a tribologist and metallurgist, working for a well-known bearing manufacturer. He went nuts. He said that he had had to provide evidence in an investigation into why a customer-rebuilder's gearboxes frequently failed after very few miles. He discovered pieces of aluminium oxide embedded in plain-bearing surfaces, which had scoured the journals, and had done very similar things to roller-bearing tracks, synchro rings and other bearing surfaces. The particles were residues left behind when the castings had been cosmetically bead blasted during the rebuild process. He went on to emphasise the importance (if such were necessary!) of getting ALL residue out of the castings before reassembly. Because residue particles are often thicker than the oil film, bead blasting, he said, was absolute anathema to clean reassembly.
This has left me in a quandary. How can I check that the residue is excluded from before, and has been properly removed after, bead blasting? Should I give up the idea and leave the gearbox halves and bell housing in their (clean) black paint? Just do the rebuild, safe in the knowledge that the box won't wear out in a very short distance, for that reason, anyway?
My question to forum members is this. If you have had experience of bead blasting, either as a service-provider or as a customer, what precautions are necessary to protect the casting internals from aluminium oxide? What should I ensure is done to be certain that the inside of the box is completely clean afterwards? Should I have the blasting done at all?
Any advice or experiences would be very welcome.
Thank you.