Jim Rosenthal
Supporter
For a while now, I've been on a mailing list for a fellow named Tom, who (I think) does business as Classiccars.com, somewhere in Western Europe. He emails a list of cars for sale- usually a lot of high-end stuff, seems to specialize in French rally cars from the 80s, as well as Bizzarrinis, Ferraris, etc. The last email, though, contained something different, and if my tech skills will allow, I will reproduce it here:
Documentation ======================================
Ford GT40 1965 Original Belgium papers documentation, ideal for replica 10 000 Euro
I wrote back (rather sardonically, I have to confess) questioning the idea of selling original papers for a genuine GT40 to be used (how?) with a replica. I also asked to be taken off his mailing list.
Does anyone know more about this? Perhaps I am rushing to judgment here and if so I owe the man an apology. But there doesn't seem any savory way to employ original documentation paperwork with respect to a replica car, other than to try to pass it off as something it isn't. Both of my "Ford" performance cars are modern cars built to a design made in the sixties- my GT40 is such, my Kirkham Cobra is as such also. I don't tell people they are vintage cars and when they assume it, I set it straight. I can't think for the life of me why anyone would want to pay $15,000 US for documentation paperwork to be used with a replica GT40 for any purposes other than fraud. Comments?
Documentation ======================================
Ford GT40 1965 Original Belgium papers documentation, ideal for replica 10 000 Euro
I wrote back (rather sardonically, I have to confess) questioning the idea of selling original papers for a genuine GT40 to be used (how?) with a replica. I also asked to be taken off his mailing list.
Does anyone know more about this? Perhaps I am rushing to judgment here and if so I owe the man an apology. But there doesn't seem any savory way to employ original documentation paperwork with respect to a replica car, other than to try to pass it off as something it isn't. Both of my "Ford" performance cars are modern cars built to a design made in the sixties- my GT40 is such, my Kirkham Cobra is as such also. I don't tell people they are vintage cars and when they assume it, I set it straight. I can't think for the life of me why anyone would want to pay $15,000 US for documentation paperwork to be used with a replica GT40 for any purposes other than fraud. Comments?