The "wrecked chassis" description of 1009 in all of the registries and books may be incorrect, or at least too cataclysmic. The dealer advertising the car says that the repairs to the chassis from the crash in 1968 were little more than some new suspension pieces to replace bent ones, and he has the invoices to verify this. He also said that Ronnie Spain has reviewed "hundreds" of photos of the car and verified that the tub is original and pretty much un-screwed with, not "resurrected" from a badly crashed heap. Perhaps we might hear from Ronnie himself about this at some point, as I wonder how the commonly-accepted story about 1009 got off in what now appears to be a completely wrong direction from the facts?