Right so i have two directions i can go with my setup.
I have a Porsche G50/52 transaxle which as default is a pull style clutch utilising external hydraulic slave and internal clutch fork and release bearing etc.
I am going to be running a Kennedy adaptor and flywheel etc but have two options for clutches.
Option 1:
Kennedy organic twin plate retaining original Porsche style pull fitment.
Option 2:
Spec will modify their organic twin plate for an internal hydraulic release bearing to convert to a push setup.
Both clutches are more than adequate for my torque etc, what i was wondering was from all of your experience would you rather run an internal hydraulic release bearing or the regular clutch fork pull setup? I am aware that the ford v8 was designed for a push style clutch rather than a pull.
Cost wise it is the same, if not slightly cheaper for the hydraulic push due to me needing to buy the clutch forks etc. Spec can machine the Kennedy flywheel to suit the changes.
What would you choose and why?
Chris
I have a Porsche G50/52 transaxle which as default is a pull style clutch utilising external hydraulic slave and internal clutch fork and release bearing etc.
I am going to be running a Kennedy adaptor and flywheel etc but have two options for clutches.
Option 1:
Kennedy organic twin plate retaining original Porsche style pull fitment.
Option 2:
Spec will modify their organic twin plate for an internal hydraulic release bearing to convert to a push setup.
Both clutches are more than adequate for my torque etc, what i was wondering was from all of your experience would you rather run an internal hydraulic release bearing or the regular clutch fork pull setup? I am aware that the ford v8 was designed for a push style clutch rather than a pull.
Cost wise it is the same, if not slightly cheaper for the hydraulic push due to me needing to buy the clutch forks etc. Spec can machine the Kennedy flywheel to suit the changes.
What would you choose and why?
Chris