Great points Phil. This is a process in which I take in as much data, tips, suggestions, wisdom, and advice, and use these factors to come up with the best result. This is also why everything is either tacked in place, or only Cleco'd in place until I have it set in my mind on a final configuration (If I sat it down on it's own weight, it would mimic the "Blues-mobile" as it falls apart). I'm soaking it all in, and it's taxing my grey matter more than I can comprehend, so notations are getting lengthy on each part or parts. It is very possible that the arms will be a couple of inches longer than their current configuration, and this will move the I.C. out further. Again, all good comments.
Oh, and the arms are tapered relative to a side view.
My latest challenge is the rear arms. I've considered rear lower arm attachment points that are parallel to the chassis centerline, and horizontally flat in a desire to eliminate any rear toe-out. But also recognize an up-angle to the front, plus an move slightly outboard for the front link's mount would also provide the slight toe-in (compressed side) as well, plus anti-squat attributes. This would mimic the 40, which is very compelling.