Why not speak to an expert re the 427? Try Brent Lykins for example:
Phone: (502)759-1431
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (502)759-1431
Email: [email protected]
It could also be a Colloti or a ZF with 5th disconnected. It does not sound like an FE to me and not many if any MK1's were retro fitted with an FE and/or used IDA's.From watching the video it appears that he only has a four speed transmission and that would be correct for a MKII with a FE engine and T44 trans. I will search more of their videos which might show the car with the clamshell raised.
more pictures of this build would be awesome. Looks amazing
this is a Gelscoe race car, and the motor was done by Peter Knight. Most of them run the Warrior motors, but Peter will build what you want however I think he's on a two year build list.Good afternoon forum.
Long time lurker here. I am getting closer to my dream of acquiring a GT40 MKII with Ken Miles Livery and am in the process of determining the engine/transaxle combination. I understand for it to be period correct, an FE 427 is the right engine for this car. That being said, based on my extremely limited youtube video watching, that engine in these cars revs to 5800 rpm or so, unlike 7000+ rpm (maybe Hollywood exaggeration?). I am a purist and while I wont race the GT40, I will drive it quite a lot. Things that concern me with 427 are inertia of the engine (revving up/down too slowly), low red line, and sound. Something about those 302s or the modern 5.2 Alluminator really keeps me intrigued however, those are not the correct engine for a MKII - particularly a Ken Miles livery.
So… is there anyway to have a configuration/variant of a 427 that can rev to 7000 rpm? Any of the shelby american engines can do this?
Or am I trying to do something that is unachievable? I dont want to deal with valve lash adjustment and solid lifters.
The sound I am looking for is what can be seen in this video. Very tight, angry, and high strung race engine. I dont know what engine this car has but probably a 302.
Will do after arriving back home....more pictures of this build would be awesome. Looks amazing
Click on "Watch" at the top of the thread if you want notifications.
Your requirement for Hydraulic Valve Lifters just knocked 500 RPM out of your 7,000 RPM Requirement. You might get a hydraulic lifter engine to 7,000 RPM once or twice, but you'll likely be repairing valve damage and a possible detonated engine.
I've built a couple of stroked Windsor engines and quite honestly, those engines had absolutely no idea that they didn't have FE Roots. One was 605HP in a Cobra and it literally scared the hell out of the owner so badly that he sold it before he crashed it.
The Sound you'll get out of a 180 degree exhaust will be glorious at higher RPMs - although some people say that it makes the V8 sound more like a V6 in normal street/highway RPMs.
If you insist on building an FE to pull 7,000 RPM, you should re-visit the drysump system as you're going to need a lot more volume of oil than you're going to get out of a wetsump system..
Thank you Randy on both fronts. I have properly subscribed to the thread and I see what you are saying regarding the solid lifters. Interesting because I am being told that the engine as is already has stronger internals and doesn’t need modifications for higher rpm use. Can you recommend anyone that I can talk to regarding this?
Let me begin with I am no expert and you probably know this already, but accurate reproduction chassis are not available in kit form. That being the case, IMHO, it doesn’t really matter if the power train is an accurate reproduction if the core of the car isn’t. You might want to consider a tribute build which is a car that looks period correct, but built with modern components and making compromises with regards to safety, reliability, drivability and comfort.Good afternoon forum.
Long time lurker here. I am getting closer to my dream of acquiring a GT40 MKII with Ken Miles Livery and am in the process of determining the engine/transaxle combination. I understand for it to be period correct, an FE 427 is the right engine for this car. That being said, based on my extremely limited youtube video watching, that engine in these cars revs to 5800 rpm or so, unlike 7000+ rpm (maybe Hollywood exaggeration?). I am a purist and while I wont race the GT40, I will drive it quite a lot. Things that concern me with 427 are inertia of the engine (revving up/down too slowly), low red line, and sound. Something about those 302s or the modern 5.2 Alluminator really keeps me intrigued however, those are not the correct engine for a MKII - particularly a Ken Miles livery.
So… is there anyway to have a configuration/variant of a 427 that can rev to 7000 rpm? Any of the shelby american engines can do this?
Or am I trying to do something that is unachievable? I dont want to deal with valve lash adjustment and solid lifters.
The sound I am looking for is what can be seen in this video. Very tight, angry, and high strung race engine. I dont know what engine this car has but probably a 302.
Thanks for that, I can relate to damn near everything there, still have a copy of Wilsons book and done similar stuff to cars Ive been involved with, If I ever get this T44 done I'll be able to add it to the list.unfortunately I could not hear it live... around 54:20
I think for a million dollars, I would want it more correct. I realize the MKII's there were only like 16 built and they were all different, but still I would want it like it ran in 1966.