Search results

The 42LE is still a good option. I've been testing mine behind a slightly modified LS. I built the LS based on an article in from the "engine Masters" magazine. In the article it dyno'd at just over 400hp. I have not dyno'd mine but based on performance, it is likely in that neighborhood...

I agree with you about the issues with the trans. I think a lot of people got major rebuilds when they only had a sensor or solenoid problem. The other major issue was people adding the wrong fuild, Mercon/Dexron will kill these transaxles quickly. That trans controller is pretty nice, it...

The purpose of the link was about the 3.5 and 42LE not the kit car, I don't care much for it either. BUT jerks like you is why I do not post.

Anytime, the 3.5 is a great engine with about 250hp bone stock. You can get close in the 275-300hp range with an open exhaust and a reprogrammed ecu. The link provided can reprogram your ecu for much higher hp with advanced ignition and shift curves, they can also remove the anti-theft and...

There is nothing terribly wrong with the Chrylser 42LE. They do require frequent fluid changes but mostly because some of the passages are so small and frequent fluid changes keeps those passages clean. Early models have the most issues. 42LE in late LHS, and 300M seem to be the best. There...

Hi all, I have owned/operated a custom auto shop for many years. I have built a few Cobras, a Diablo, and finished many customer started kits. I am designing a component exotic that is mid-engine powered and just wanted to tap into the wealth of knowledge that exsists here. Maybe even build...