Foreign policy experts say that NK has much of their conventional weapons, which are alot in sheer numbers, pointed directly at US ally South Korea, because: a) NK and SK are technically still at war and b) the threat of destroying Seoul in a matter of seconds or minutes, is what keeps the US from just marching into NK and killing their leader.
"
S.K would be hit by N.K.s conventional weapons in the event IT were attacked by whoever.
N.K. has about 30 bazillion conventional weapons aimed at S.K. 24/7/365...supposedly as a deterrent to said attacks.
Sort of like blackmailing the world, huh?
I don't think talking is ever going to make any difference in what Kim Jong Un wants...he wants to flex his nuclear muscles to prove to the world how "bad" he is!
Let's suppose the U.S. made the first strike (perish that thought!!!!) and took out Kim Jong Un and his band of "merry" men? Would N.K. still want to annihilate S.K. without him?
IMHO, whatever is done about N.K. needs to be sanctioned by the United Nations. N.K. can't nuke every country in the whole world! :idea:
Doug