It is my understanding that a 6 point is not legal on roads in the US as they need to have a single release point...but I could be wrong.
The only 6-point harnesses I've seen
do have a single release point. But be that as it may....
The federal government does not directy regulate seat belt equipment for cars already registered; they regulate manufacturing and importing. However, the state does regulate how cars on the road are equipped. For example, here is the relevant text from the California vehicle code:
"The safety belts shall conform to motor vehicle safety standards established by the United States Department of Transportation. This subdivision, however, does not require installation or maintenance of safety belts if it is not required by the laws of the United States applicable to the vehicle at the time of its initial sale."
My question is, when discussing a kit car, do the DOT safety standards even apply? I think not. As far as I know the DOT standards apply only to certified manufacturers products, not kit cars or rollers. If that were
not true then we would all have to have airbags in our GT40s that were initially sold in (say) 2007, right? So, why do we think we are constrained to three-point belts with single release points?
However, ignoring the kit-car jurisdiction issue for the moment, here is the text in FMVSS 209 related to the release mechanism from
Standard No. 209; Seat belt assemblies. - Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration:
"(e) Release. A Type 1 or Type 2 seat belt assembly shall be provided with a buckle
or buckles readily accessible to the occupant to permit his easy and rapid removal from the assembly. Buckle release mechanism shall be designed to minimize the possibility of accidental release. A buckle with release mechanism in the latched position shall have only one opening in which the tongue can be inserted on the end of the buckle designed to receive and latch the tongue."
Note the plural "
buckles".
The Schroth document identifies "FE" products as being the ones that are for "legal street use". My reading of the literature indicates that what FE really refers to is a "pushbutton" release mechanism as opposed to "cam lock". The issue is with being able to print the word "PRESS" on the buckle for emergency personnel to use. (see
http://www.schrothracing.com/search/id/15980 )
I went through all this when I put Simpson six-point belts in my NSX; it was the cam-lock release that presented the
legal issue. However, I kept my three-point belts in the car since I never want to drive on the street fully belted with a racing harness anyway, so I wasn't worried about a policeman noticing my camlock buckles. There are a lot of reasons not to wear competition belts on the street anyway, but that's another subject. I still think the best solution is automatic three-point for street and manual six-point for the track. You
can have both and they solve different problems.