About Trump's confirmations...they're probably being held up for good reason.
Doug
...really? What was the "good reason" for stonewalling Gorsuch?
These are just two examples...of why Democrats refuse to approve Drumpf’s judicial nominees. They’re ignoramuses.
Depends on what your definition of what “good” means.
...there isn’t a “good”reason for filibustering his nomination other than Garland was screwed.
...However, Gorsuch did have the controversial “Hobby Lobby” decision, which to Democrats, is VERY worrisome and would be enough to “stonewall” his nomination.
No. When you boil it all down, for Democrats the disqualifying factor is the fact Trump's nominees are NOT far left liberals. NO conservative nominee for ANY position will ever pass muster in the left's book.
Like what the meaning of "is" is...
Garland or any OTHER person having been passed over changes N-O-T-H-I-N-G with regard to whether Gorsuch's qulifications / credentials (or those of anyone ELSE) are stellar enough for him to be confirmed or not. The former is NOT relevant to/has no bearing ON/changes nothing REGARDING the latter.
There you go right there. THERE'S the big diff between a "qualified" justice and an "unqualified" one in the eyes of liberals. Gorsuch decided BASED ON THE WORDING OF THE CONSTITUTION as opposed to deciding CONTRARY to 'same thru the imposition/implementation/use of the judicial tool of "interpretation". Democrats HATE that.
G'night all -
Michael Cohen’s office raided by Feds earlier today. No news yet on what kind of search/siezure it was...but the name Robert Mueller was associated with the request for the warrant.
It’s about to get very interesting!
Doug
Lawyer client????????????? privilege information????????? Sounds like someone from law broke the law.
You should refrain from voting from this point forward due to lack of understanding of basic issues that a citizen should understand.
...Are you really this uninformed? And you are allowed to vote?...You should refrain from voting from this point forward due to lack of understanding of basic issues that a citizen should understand.
I have to assume you've never seen any of the 'man/woman-in-the-street' interviews with liberals wherein their lack of even the basic understanding/knowledge about which candidate did or did not say this-or-that regarding various issues were showcased?
Take this little dandy wherein they AGREE with Billary's imaginary/totally made up campaign platform to repeal the Bill of Rights, for instance:
These Hillary Supporters Want Her to Repeal the Bill of Rights if She's Elected President - YouTube
Jus' sayin'...
So, now you're comparing Walt to some dummies that were "found" on the street?
Once again you've chosen to conveniently miss/ignore the obvious point.
So you copied my reply and missed the :laugh:
Talk about missing the point, or in this case, the humor.
Rod, I have not found the ultra-conservative crowd to have much of a sense of humor...just my observation...
Cheers!
Doug