You didn't even read the article.
"Though he can't say for certain," leads us to "if that's true." NOW THAT'S MODERN SCIENCE!
Yeah, this is real solid stuff; "Though he can't say for certain, the winds appear to be carrying more moisture from the warming Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea eastward."
"If that's true, some of the moisture would fall into the region around the Caspian Sea. But as the winds rise into Karakoram's frigid heights, any remaining water would come down as snow, feeding the glaciers."
The fact is that, " Researchers have also found that glaciers on California's Mt. Shasta have been growing for decades. And glacier recession has been blunted in the mountains of Oregon and Washington state because of increased moisture from the warming Pacific Ocean."
"Growing for decades," and its all really not happening, HAH!
I put up the article to show that glacier growth IS HAPPENING. They can't deny it, but they still have to come up with a "we don't really know, but if we're right it could mean." Kind of like "we have to pass the bill to find out what's in it," don't you think?
And that's the kind of science you are relying on. A teaching moment, no???