Like all fanatics they cannot accept that the other side may have a point.
Seems to me we're all acting like fanatics around here.
You're right, there are two points of view here....but, do they have to be so far opposed?
I mean, is it impossible to admit that the weather patterns are changing a little, or does it have to be Armageddon to make that clear...and, if does have to be that severe, how much of the issue has to be of man's contribution and how much can be just plain ol' Mother Nature's fickle temperment?
Is it possible to admit that the nay-sayers might have a point, that man-kind might not be correct in their "short term" assessment? I mean, after all, the earth has been warming and cooling repeatedly for over 4 Billion years, according to science's best estimate, and yet we homo sapiens have been here for very little of that period.
Does it have to be ALL man's fault or NONE of man's fault for everyone to express an opinion?
I'm tired of an all black vs all white world, I see many hues, both with my eyes and with my intelligence. In the end, IMHO we're all right and we're all wrong here.....we've become as polarized as have the two prevailing political parties in the U.S.
IMHO what's happening is a natural phenomenon that is probably being accellerated by man's contributions. I don't believe we are COMPLETELY to blame, any more than I believe we humans could stop the phenomenon even if we wanted to. We might be able to slow it down a bit, but even if we were to eschew all petroleum based forms of energy production, the earth would still undergo periodic warming and cooling trends....always has, always will.
The BIG, $64M question, is have we contributed to the degree that we cannot stop the magnitude of the warming trend (IF there really IS one) before it manages to exceed mankind's ability to adapt? I don't think so, but we'll see.....we can adapt to the temperature changes, can we adapt to the loss of valuable resources that cannot survive at the temperature swings we're hearing be predicted, or will we have to "engineer" life forms, both animal and plant, in order to be able to continue to meet our most basic of needs.
THAT, my friends, is the $64M question!!!!!!
We humans can only hope we can do so....but, considering the level of serious scientific evidence that we have, IMHO it is unwise for us to believe that NONE of it is true.....any more than we can believe that ALL of it is true. We must, though, admit that even if only some of it must be true, then to react in such a fanatical/divisive manner as we are could well just be collective species suicide.....
....but, then, species have been appearing and disapparing from the face of earth for over 4 billion years, just what makes us humans believe we have the power to change things in that respect? Is it our time to disappear from this earth? If we were to change our ways, could we stop it? If we don't, how quickly will the "end" come?
Then, again, this all might just well be "....much ado about nothing"....maybe.......but if it isn't, shouldn't we at least do something? We're all worried about leaving our children with a destroyed economy, what if we leave them a destroyed planet?
Cheers!
Doug