ZF failure?

DCraig

CURRENTLY BANNED
My first post here. I’ve worked on Porsches since 1968 but I still love the project cars. Perhaps I can help by adding my two cents worth on the ZF boxes used in Porsches.

Unless there are some specific questions concerning the 901 boxes, I will not include them since they don’t get along well with higher horsepower inputs. Their normal mode of failure is to twist the rear of the main input shaft off. All Porsche ZF boxes use helical cut gears.

The 915 box is probably the all time favorite transaxle to use in mid engine cars because they are reasonably plentiful; you can flip the ring gear for correct rotation; parts are still available (but getting pricy); limited slip as well as Quaife differentials are available; and unless you abuse them, they will last a long time and give trouble free service. More on abuse later. The aluminum cases are a bit stronger than the magnesium cases but case failures, except for pushing out the differential side cover, are only found when internal parts get broken and fed through the gear train. The factory found that it was cheaper for them to produce the aluminum cases, the strength factor was a bonus. The early 915 boxes had skinny little ears on the guide sleeve that rides inside the slider. They were prone to failure. These were increased in size in about 1976 and are used in all later boxes. They are upgradeable to the early boxes.

The 930 boxes have gears that are 30% wider than the 915 gears. The G-50 gears are also 30% wider than the 915 gears. This was done because under racing conditions and big time horsepower, the gears would fail occasionally. I have never seen a gear failure on a 930/935 box that wasn’t caused by debris from another failed part.

The 934/935 boxes have internal oil pumps (915 race car boxes did also); a spray bar directing oil against the ring gear were it meshes with the pinion gear; input and pinion shafts have drilled oil slots; and the input and pinion shafts are nitrided. To my knowledge these are the strongest boxes made.

Now lets talk about abuse. We use friction synchros up until the G-50 box which uses GM style synchros. Friction synchros DON’T react well to speed shifting or short ratio shift towers. It overpowers the synchro and lets the slider teeth bang into the gear engagement teeth. That’s the grinding noise you hear since the gears on the input shaft and pinion shaft stay in constant mesh. If anti-friction gear oil additives are used the synchros stop working.

The number one killer of transaxles is when the driver downshifts, especially into first gear, and the expanders over speed and the anchor block breaks. This spreads the synchro ring and feeds it through the internals. Not pretty. If the driver shifted into first over 20MPH on a 928, even if the clutch was never engaged, the anchor block said bye-bye. The number two killer is starting the engine without oil in the transaxle. The needle bearing last less than 60 seconds. Number three killer is using regular gear oil in a limited slip. Limited slip gear oil STINKS badly. I have used Swepco oils for many years.

Under big torque loads open differentials break their spider gears; LSDs can warp where the ring gear meets the carrier; any of them can push the cover plate into deformation, which opens the ring and pinion clearance, and can then clean all the teeth off the ring gear; I’ve never seen a titanium spool hub fail.

I believe we are dealing with hard driven street cars here instead of all out race cars that take full power abuse for long periods of time.

If I can figure out how to do it, I’ll post pictures.
 
Hi Craig,
where have you been at Porsche??? Weissach Development Center???
I have been there from 1990 to 1994 developing the Bugatti EB110 transmission on the Porsche dynos.
Probably you renenber me, but I do not.
Help me.
Ciao
Wanni
 

Lynn Larsen

Lynn Larsen
Tirebiter,

Great to have another Porsche specialist on the forum!!! Especially one with such engaging interests (see DCraig's public profile) rockonsmile

Lynn
 
Thanks guys, for the quick response. The motor is a small block 400 ci with Dale Ernharts 18 degree nascar truck heads, toque is about 580 at 5000 rpm, I roadrace the car and have 13"x17" trans am slicks when i'm on the track. As I said earlier the trans worked great for two seasons. Busted means I sheared the ring an pinion like the pictures above,but the big problem is it wears out the pilot bushing in three track days. Wish I could find a needel bearing, chevy to ford ? Thinking about a new case.
 
Dont know about USA stuff but Ford Australia sell a needle brg race for all 6 cyl & SBF that fits ,top loaders, T5, tremecs etc . The brg is pressed into an alloy boss/adaptor that fits ford crank that you would have no trouble turning down to suit the chev crank. Also later chevs have a needle brg that matches GM Muncie/T10/Richmond etc. Got a hunch your only going to shift the problem somewhere else with that torque though!

One thing, if your front/input shaft does not extend into the spigot brg area of the crank you would be well advised to make up a spigot brg carrier that is retained by the flywheel & or its bolts. The further the spigot brg is from the rear main brg the more difficult it will be to get it to live, you are fighting crank whip as well as input shaft deflection when this happens.
 

MWGT40

Supporter
Sorry, a bit late to this thread - seems to have been resurrected after a few months.

In any event, to give some perspective from the UK race crowd, whilst we have had many experiences of transaxles breaking in the GTD40 Sprint and Hillclimb Championship, we have never had any issues with the cars that run the ZF transaxle.
 
I just read through this entire thread for the first time and the info was excellent. I'm feeling much better about my decision to go with a ZF. I'm also shocked at how quickly the reputation of one individual who posted on it has changed in the last nine months. Such initial promise...
 
I also have just read through this. Much of the discussion is centered around cars running 450 hp or so. What about high 500's? My heretic LS7 powered 40 will be probably be just shy of 600. ZF? Or specially built Porsche box from CMS?
 
Jay,

its the torque not the HP as mentioned previously..

Your hotrod will do just fine with a ZF...ask Ron and Dean what 600plus feels like with a ZF.....

Dont get me wrong I love the 930 transaxles...they are my favourite high torque box..and I recommend them regularly ....especially for Big block applications.
 
Jay,

its the torque not the HP as mentioned previously..

Your hotrod will do just fine with a ZF...ask Ron and Dean what 600plus feels like with a ZF.....

Dont get me wrong I love the 930 transaxles...they are my favourite high torque box..and I recommend them regularly ....especially for Big block applications.

Fran,

It's the torque that has me a bit worried, as it should be nearly 500 ft/lbs. Ron and Dean are both making big hp from slightly smaller faster turning motors (granted, both motors make an LS7 look like a basic production motor). And neither has a lot of time on the tranny. I am pretty sure a ZF will be fine. But I am also coming from a car where the tranny is the weak link and runs 25k if you can get it. This is the one groundhog I'd like to hit with a missle.

It looks like their are different flavors of ZF also... lots to think about.
 
Last edited:

Ron McCall

Supporter
Fran,

It's the torque that has me a bit worried, as it should be nearly 500 ft/lbs. Ron and Dean are both making big hp from slightly smaller faster turning motors (granted, both motors make an LS7 look like a basic production motor). And neither has a lot of time on the tranny. I am pretty sure a ZF will be fine. But I am also coming from a car where the tranny is the weak link and runs 25k if you can get it. This is the one groundhog I'd like to hit with a missle.

It looks like their are different flavors of ZF also... lots to think about.


Actually I had the engine that's in my GT40( 670hp and 515 lbft) in my Pantera for 1 1/2 years of SERIOUS pounding ! The Pantera is over 600# heavier than the GT40 also.
I recently took that ZF apart to fix a leak and inspect it and it looked GREAT!
 
Actually I had the engine that's in my GT40( 670hp and 515 lbft) in my Pantera for 1 1/2 years of SERIOUS pounding ! The Pantera is over 600# heavier than the GT40 also.
I recently took that ZF apart to fix a leak and inspect it and it looked GREAT!

Now that's what I am looking for. Thanks!

-J.
 
Back
Top