None of us were there.
We're therefore left on our own to decide (based on past statements of supposed actual 'head' ["supreme"] Muslim Mullahs, heads of Muslim STATES and various Muslim terrorists) what's likely to be 'gospel' vs. "rubbish" as regards what was said in that exchange as opposed to what we're being TOLD after the fact by a gov't "Information Officer".
IF the "spokesman" actually was an inmate and not a "Muslim minister", he still reportedly SAID what he reportedly said...he still outlined what HE in fact personally understood to the be the case and therefore believed.
So, the 'issue' here is what exactly? :shrug: Whether the dude who said what reportedly was said reflects a 'minority' view within Islam, or what? (And, bear in mind, a "minority" view in Islam represents the view of several M-I-L-L-I-O-N Muslims.)
Edit: Eeeeeeh, screw it. Let's drop it...