GT40s.com - View Single Post

Gary Gibbs · 06-27-03, 04:25 PM

Ron,
I do think the Audi box has shown to be a very good transaxle. The main reason I am going with the RBT is that in order to fit the taller 351 engine in the car (CAV) the tranny must be run inverted. This is currently not possible with the Audi. The added benefit is the better gear ratio selections and lower CG. If I were running a 302 based car I would probably go with the Audi.

06-27-03, 04:25 PM	#60 (permalink)
Gary Gibbs CCX33911 10 tenths Join Date: Dec 2001 GT40: Virginia Posts: 1,222 Rep Power: 19	Re: CAV GT 40 #47 Gulf Spec Ron, I do think the Audi box has shown to be a very good transaxle. The main reason I am going with the RBT is that in order to fit the taller 351 engine in the car (CAV) the tranny must be run inverted. This is currently not possible with the Audi. The added benefit is the better gear ratio selections and lower CG. If I were running a 302 based car I would probably go with the Audi.