My Have Found A Coyote Intake Solution

So the new part came today and even though my motor is not going to have that classic look, I think I like how it’s coming along.
 

Attachments

  • BF371B6E-DB39-491C-A0C8-47A25621AE5C.jpeg
    BF371B6E-DB39-491C-A0C8-47A25621AE5C.jpeg
    474.4 KB · Views: 422
  • DB097838-F71D-43F2-9877-7243C226DB01.jpeg
    DB097838-F71D-43F2-9877-7243C226DB01.jpeg
    436.7 KB · Views: 397
  • 2A0BB7C4-2AAA-4548-9523-61048A35C843.jpeg
    2A0BB7C4-2AAA-4548-9523-61048A35C843.jpeg
    498.7 KB · Views: 418
  • 8D1819F8-7ABD-468B-866B-0929EA7692EF.jpeg
    8D1819F8-7ABD-468B-866B-0929EA7692EF.jpeg
    488.7 KB · Views: 855
Steve, Will that fit under the rear window and rear deck? What about a filter, that might take up more space.

Bob Woods
Tornado GT40 in Texas

Hi Bob,

It’s gonna be tight. I think the MKII gives you a “little” more room, but it’s going to be close.

The air intake will go sideways so it wound cause any additional height.
 
In my opinion, it doesn't look right at all. It's better looking with the OEM intake.
Why not go for a custom made sheet metal intake with quad Webers, that would look as it should.
 
In my opinion, it doesn't look right at all. It's better looking with the OEM intake.
Why not go for a custom made sheet metal intake with quad Webers, that would look as it should.

I don’t like the stock manifold. What’s important to me is drive by wire. I can’t do drive by wire any other way. Also, 8 stacks are like 6 grand.
 
Mocked up the fuel rails. I think the black looks great.

I like the look. My car will be modern underneath and classic on the outside. This fits what I’m going for.

To be honest I’d prefer an 8 Stack, but like I said, it’s 6 grand that I can spend elsewhere.
 

Attachments

  • 08BBACFE-EE6E-434A-AB86-64B4383970DC.jpeg
    08BBACFE-EE6E-434A-AB86-64B4383970DC.jpeg
    471 KB · Views: 432
  • 870B9961-289F-42B0-99C9-6F87A0F80BBE.jpeg
    870B9961-289F-42B0-99C9-6F87A0F80BBE.jpeg
    435.1 KB · Views: 378
  • 6CF083C1-2FA2-4B4B-845A-85C4D833C9A6.jpeg
    6CF083C1-2FA2-4B4B-845A-85C4D833C9A6.jpeg
    418.5 KB · Views: 353
  • 04BC0F2D-4595-464E-B51B-9904E69B098F.jpeg
    04BC0F2D-4595-464E-B51B-9904E69B098F.jpeg
    443.6 KB · Views: 694
  • 6CFE6CF4-4DE1-4B38-AB14-AA147F4AD350.jpeg
    6CFE6CF4-4DE1-4B38-AB14-AA147F4AD350.jpeg
    434.4 KB · Views: 372

Julian

Lifetime Supporter
Curious why you chose a manifold with inlet on top rather than a rear entry? If you were really determined you can get the intake manifold starter plates and probably build an IR manifold for ITB's for a lot less than $6K.
 
I was between a rock and a hard place. If it faced the back there was no room for an air intake. If it pointed towards the front, it would interfere with the headers.

My only option was on top and put the air intake towards the side.
 
Here’s my chassis (Active Power) with a coyote engine from the Active Power site. Looks like I’ll have no trouble with the rear clamshell.

The other picture is my chassis that I bought. It had a green engine. The guy I bought if from kept the engine and sold me the chassis. Looks like he has an elevated manifold and there is still plenty of room.

I won’t know until I install the engine, but it seems like it should fit.
 

Attachments

  • 7A1D28B0-7AAB-44FF-8D43-015E2EA577CF.png
    7A1D28B0-7AAB-44FF-8D43-015E2EA577CF.png
    2.7 MB · Views: 383
  • 762F56A8-3F17-4880-A943-541BA9286319.png
    762F56A8-3F17-4880-A943-541BA9286319.png
    2.9 MB · Views: 397
I’m done and I’m diggin it.

I get if many of you will hate this, but I love it and it’s totally functional and I can use all of the stock coyote senors and control pack and most importantly, the drive by wire pedal.
 

Attachments

  • 6C6B51C5-A7BC-4F68-AF55-B50AAEE3D0CD.jpeg
    6C6B51C5-A7BC-4F68-AF55-B50AAEE3D0CD.jpeg
    461.8 KB · Views: 332
  • 3C9C0D2F-B24C-45D9-AB1D-57BA0B927895.jpeg
    3C9C0D2F-B24C-45D9-AB1D-57BA0B927895.jpeg
    436.5 KB · Views: 321
  • 521F4524-00C5-45ED-BAF3-2A2332E79F5C.jpeg
    521F4524-00C5-45ED-BAF3-2A2332E79F5C.jpeg
    453.7 KB · Views: 351
  • 3398B002-15B9-42FF-BD28-02B048DDABF6.jpeg
    3398B002-15B9-42FF-BD28-02B048DDABF6.jpeg
    443.5 KB · Views: 350
  • 6E75148D-6C99-4A1C-8CBB-03AEC61550A8.jpeg
    6E75148D-6C99-4A1C-8CBB-03AEC61550A8.jpeg
    454.7 KB · Views: 323
  • 471CA605-3896-4703-AE63-DD7D1CA41697.jpeg
    471CA605-3896-4703-AE63-DD7D1CA41697.jpeg
    445.1 KB · Views: 345
The more I connect the hoses and wires, the better it looks.
 

Attachments

  • 3B19F1C2-294F-4160-946E-3E5990738AA3.jpeg
    3B19F1C2-294F-4160-946E-3E5990738AA3.jpeg
    451.5 KB · Views: 322
  • B32215EF-B63A-43C8-89C8-C144908B1BFC.jpeg
    B32215EF-B63A-43C8-89C8-C144908B1BFC.jpeg
    472.8 KB · Views: 307
  • 96A224F1-2114-4D85-89D6-2896782236DB.jpeg
    96A224F1-2114-4D85-89D6-2896782236DB.jpeg
    453.4 KB · Views: 314
I note that the "rocker" cover on one side vents into the filter side of the MAF but the other side vents into the manifold side of the MAF? I thought this wasn't recommended?

I only ask because I'm in the middle of sorting this out now on my motor.

Cheers, Lance.
 
This set up is only to get it test started. Once it’s installed in the car, I’m going to have a catch can set up. A catch can vents into the manifold as this set up does. Not sure who said that this is wrong?
 

Attachments

  • 1BEFA1E3-8467-4B48-84B1-A1BFE1543D58.png
    1BEFA1E3-8467-4B48-84B1-A1BFE1543D58.png
    815.4 KB · Views: 345
Hello Steve,

Interesting diagram that. A vendor proposing venting in to both locations. If you refer to this thread:

https://www.gt40s.com/threads/crankcase-ventilation-and-evap-system.52369/#post-526438

you’ll see my arrangement and query. Member Dimi pointed out that venting directly in to the manifold would upset the air / fuel mixture. Not wrong, as such, but not recommended.

I hasten to add that I am a newbie as far as modern car electronics are concerned and having to learn quickly. I’ve spent much more time slinging spanners at the dinosaur technology on my ’74 850 Norton Commando. No ECU or sensors there!

Anyway, in line with Dimi’s advice, I’m assembling the arrangement shown in the attached diagram. It would however, be more convenient to vent directly into the manifold.

Are there any more opinions on this issue?

Cheers, Lance
 

Attachments

  • GT40 Engine Breathers.jpg
    GT40 Engine Breathers.jpg
    137.1 KB · Views: 308
Back
Top