Note to self: When building 180 headers for a Clevor...

the windsor jig doesn't work.
 

Attachments

  • 20200608_124131.jpg
    20200608_124131.jpg
    90.8 KB · Views: 386
  • IMG_20200529_155535429.jpg
    IMG_20200529_155535429.jpg
    200.9 KB · Views: 395
  • 20200608_124114.jpg
    20200608_124114.jpg
    58.1 KB · Views: 366
Whats with the CHI head on one side and having a Kaasie head on the other.
just what was close to hand?

PS headers/extractors are looking good.
 

Julian

Lifetime Supporter
When you say Windsor I assume you mean a 302 8.2" deck height patternvs. the 9.5" for the 351W (Clevor base)? The crossover pipes appear to be farther apart than the distance between the heads, not sure they'd meet at a common collector even if the heads were butted together?
 
Looks like a 9.5” deck Windsor block. Or certainly something bigger than an 8.2”.
looked at the photos again. Have the heads got Kaasie on one end and CHI on the other end?
and clevor is because they are a Cleveland head on the Windsor block.
 
When you say Windsor I assume you mean a 302 8.2" deck height patternvs. the 9.5" for the 351W (Clevor base)? The crossover pipes appear to be farther apart than the distance between the heads, not sure they'd meet at a common collector even if the heads were butted together?
The windsor name has always been associated with the 351W, Its the 8.2 blocks that have had the windsor tag added in recent times, yet they could have 302 M for Mexico assy, 5.0 A for Aussie assy etc if we want to be pedantic.
 

Julian

Lifetime Supporter
The windsor name has always been associated with the 351W, Its the 8.2 blocks that have had the windsor tag added in recent times, yet they could have 302 M for Mexico assy, 5.0 A for Aussie assy etc if we want to be pedantic.
Agreed, I assumed it had to be 8.2" given how far off the collector pipes are, switching to Cleveland heads on a Windsor 9.5" deck height should not have resulted in that degree of mismatch.
 
Back
Top