Jim you're almost as good at deflecting attention from the truth as the Obama administration. Dredging up incidents (with your usual one-sided liberal bent) from 30 years ago from a dead president is a bit irrelevant to the original post. Using the Bush analogy is also irrelevant as there's no evidence of any attempts to cover up.
While I can't speak for Jim (he does an admirable job of speaking for himself, IMHO), I think I share many of his beliefs.
We both believe that the issue is not "the issue" under discussion, whether or not it be the Beghazi incident or the marine attack.
IMHO...the issue IS that the ultra-conservative (radical fringe?) seems to be upset beyond belief by the things that the current administration has done, or has not done, depending on what the issue is under discussion. However, they fail to recognize that there have been many such failures by presidents of a more "Conservative" nature. What they are railing against is just standard operating procedure in politics and both parties have been guilty of the same transgressions as the Conservatives believe BOB has committed. Yet, there has been NO acknowledgement by the conservative contingent as to the egregious nature of the transgressions committed by the presidents with whom they more closely identify. This just seems to be an issue of anger (hatred? Go ahead, Larry, have some fun with that) toward a president who is not guilty of any act not committed by prior presidents, regardless of political orientation, other than having what many believe to be the wrong color skin.
Jim points out the failures of the previous presidents very well...yet there is no outrage by the conservatives, only anger at the much less costly (in numbers of lives) actions (or failure to act, as they believe) by our current POTUS.
As for the "cover-up" issue...when have you seen a political party in power NOT try to cover up their actions when they know their actions will not be popular? SOP, once again, and nothing to be alarmed about regarding BOB (unless, in the interest of fairnes, you are equally alarmed at the actions, or failures to act, of prior POTUS with whose political ideas you are more closely aligned).
Cheers!
Doug