A very powerful piece of writing by Bryan Forbes

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Just when you thought there was nothing more to upset the return of the MPs expenses:

From the Daily Mail:


article-0-06380FAC000005DC-91_233x423.jpg
Lord Martin: He is the first Speaker to be forced to quit in 300 years

The former Commons Speaker, Michael Martin, has had his controversial peerage quietly confirmed - in the middle of the Parliamentary recess.
He will take up the title of 'Baron Martin of Springburn, of Port Dundas in the City of Glasgow' after the honour was conferred by the Queen last week.

Mr Martin was the first Speaker of the House of Commons to be forced to resign in more than 300 years.

It is established practice for former speakers to be elevated to the Lords, but there had been calls for Mr Martin to be denied a peerage after his flawed response to the MPs' expenses scandal.

After losing the support of the House of Commons following repeated attempts to block the publication of MPs' full allowances, he resigned in May.

The announcement that he would soon be joining them on the Lords' red benches sparked anger among other peers last night.

Lord Oakeshott, a Liberal Democrat spokesman in the Lords, said: 'Mr Martin's period as Speaker diminished both the authority of the position and the credibility of the House of Commons. It is wrong that he should pick up a peerage automatically in the Lords after he failed as Speaker.'

Springburn was the name of Mr Martin's Glasgow North East constituency before boundary reorganisation in 2005, while Port Dundas is the site of a large whisky distillery in the city.

No by-election will be held in the constituency until the autumn. Lord Oakeshott said: 'He's chosen Springburn as his title but the people of Springburn deserve to have a representative in Parliament.

'This is a disgraceful delay and the people deserve a chance to elect a new MP now.'

The news was slipped out in the London Gazette this week. The publication, which reports Government and Palace announcements, said: 'The Queen has been pleased by Letters Patent under the Great Seal of the Realm dated 25 August 2009, to confer the dignity of a Barony of the United Kingdom for life upon the Right Honourable Michael John Martin, by the name, style and title of Baron Martin of Springburn, of Port Dundas in the City of Glasgow.'

The Queen's approval came despite a warning from sleaze watchdogs that elevating Mr Martin would damage the reputation of the House of Lords. In a letter to Gordon Brown, the House of Lords Appointments Commission said Mr Martin's personal expenses claims were open to question.

But Mr Brown, who uses his powers of patronage to recommend peers to the Queen, overrode their concerns.

As an ex-Speaker, 63-year-old Mr Martin is entitled to an annual pension of around £38,000. When his MP's pension kicks in at 65, the former sheet metal worker will be receiving around £80,000 from tax-payer-funded pension pots worth £1.4million.
As a peer he would also qualify for £174 for each night he spends in London on Lords' business, adding up to a possible £25,000 a year, and he may claim £3,000 in office costs.

Mr Martin announced in a 34-second statement on May 19 that he was stepping down as Speaker and also as an MP, sparking a by-election which could prove disastrous for the Labour Party. The Scottish Nationalist Party is hoping to snatch the once safe seat of Glasgow North East.

Mr Martin was replaced as Speaker by John Bercow in June.


article-0-063810D5000005DC-203_468x195.jpg



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1209809/Lord-Gorbals-Michael-Martins-controversial-peerage-confirmed-middle-Parliamentary-recess.html#ixzz0PY4AS6KC
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
in some parts of this country the managers of postal sorting offices are sorting the mail outside on the pavement whiles their staff engage in strike action. Letters will become subject to more and more delays and deliverie may come down to one a week if it carries on. Now, to cap it all when you try and email the prime minister all you get is the same notice that has been on the website for nearly 14 months. Look at the date !

Tuesday 12 August 2008
Email Number 10

We have decided at this time that it is important to take another look at the E-mail Number 10 service to ensure that it meets the same high standards as the other content and communication measures that the website delivers.
Unfortunately, this means that we will be unable to replace the service as quickly as we had hoped, but we aim to have it up and running as soon as possible. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Gordon has taken to sending us messages, accompanied by his sickly grin, on Utube and he may - I've heard - be running his government and his cabinet using My Face and Face Book very soon. He is becoming more and more pathetic so the only way now I can send a letter to No 10 is to take it to Whitehall (We are not allowed into Downing Street any more) and hand it to a policeman in the hope that he can pass it to another policeman during a meal break who might hand it to another policeman who knows someone who might know someone who can take it to Number 10.

I am sending a letter to him today and copying it to the BBC in the hope that Andrew Marr might mention it in his politics show at the weekend.
What am I going to say ?

214

Go figure it out.
If you are in the USA the figure is 829

here are the current casualties

<TABLE class=Smalltable id=ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_countryGridView style="BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse" cellSpacing=0 rules=all border=1><TBODY><TR class=contactDept><TH scope=col>Country</TH><TH scope=col>Total</TH></TR><TR><TD>Australia</TD><TD class=contactNumber>11</TD></TR><TR><TD>Belgium</TD><TD class=contactNumber>1</TD></TR><TR><TD>Canada</TD><TD class=contactNumber>130</TD></TR><TR><TD>Czech</TD><TD class=contactNumber>3</TD></TR><TR><TD>Denmark</TD><TD class=contactNumber>24</TD></TR><TR><TD>Estonia</TD><TD class=contactNumber>6</TD></TR><TR><TD>Finland</TD><TD class=contactNumber>1</TD></TR><TR><TD>France</TD><TD class=contactNumber>31</TD></TR><TR><TD>Germany</TD><TD class=contactNumber>33</TD></TR><TR><TD>Hungary</TD><TD class=contactNumber>2</TD></TR><TR><TD>Italy</TD><TD class=contactNumber>15</TD></TR><TR><TD>Latvia</TD><TD class=contactNumber>3</TD></TR><TR><TD>Lithuania</TD><TD class=contactNumber>1</TD></TR><TR><TD>Netherlands</TD><TD class=contactNumber>21</TD></TR><TR><TD>Norway</TD><TD class=contactNumber>4</TD></TR><TR><TD>Poland</TD><TD class=contactNumber>13</TD></TR><TR><TD>Portugal</TD><TD class=contactNumber>2</TD></TR><TR><TD>Romania</TD><TD class=contactNumber>11</TD></TR><TR><TD>South Korea</TD><TD class=contactNumber>1</TD></TR><TR><TD>Spain</TD><TD class=contactNumber>25</TD></TR><TR><TD>Sweden</TD><TD class=contactNumber>2</TD></TR><TR><TD>Turkey</TD><TD class=contactNumber>2</TD></TR><TR><TD>UK</TD><TD class=contactNumber>214</TD></TR><TR><TD>US</TD><TD class=contactNumber>829</TD></TR><TR class=contactDept><TD>Total</TD><TD align=right>1385</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


And for what I ask. Answers on a postcard please.
 
Last edited:

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Mr. Brown,
Prime Minister

The figure this weekend stands at 216 repatriated as killed in action in Afghanistan. Yesterday the coroner gave an 'Unlawful Killing' at one of the many inquests that we are seeing in the Coroners Court in Oxford. Prime Minister, who killed him? If he had a full complement of kit, riding in a decent armoured vehicle, with a complement of fully trained colleagues instead of , I suspect, some very new to the army and just arrived in Helmand young kid, would he have got killed? Probably not in answer to most of the above comments. The young kid with him was killed as well.
Why don't you go out one day and accompany the C.O.s as they knock on the doors and tell the wives and parents that they will get a free ride or their petrol paid to drive to Brize Norton to wintness their loved ones final homecoming.
Prime Minister, will you hazard a guess at what the figure will it be next weekend ?
Please - no more sickly Utube movies in answer to these questions.
I am this letter to one of your Labour M.P.s to pass it directly to you as you are not accepting emails (since August 2008) and the policeman in Whitehall told me he would not accept my letter to you.
We got a post today - the first in 5 days. I thought you migh like to know.


David Morton
Marchfield House,
Marlow
Buckinghamshire
SL7 3RZ
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
David,
You have to keep writing to your political leaders and voicing your concerns about this unwinnable fiasco. If it means massive border security again, (the UK has just stepped this up this ) virtually little or no immigration for the forseeable future, and a loss of dignity to certain so called religious groups (such as wearing all concealing head to toe gowns) then let's look at all of it as a possible alternative to coming back from Afghanistan feet first and being driven through a small Cotswold town in a hearse. For every soldier that loses his life , no matter which country he is from, means another another grief laden family and friends who will never ever get over it.The political leaders just blunder on as though it's not happening.
Dave
 
David,
Thank's for the link. I think we will be out next year at the end of our commitment, or operate in a lesser capacity. Most of our guys right now are from Quebec Royal 22nd regiment or Van Doos. The majority of the Quebecers although proud are not happy being there. All we are fighting for now is human rights in a backwards country.
Dave
 
You can look at the casualty figures of Operation Enduring Freedom on

iCasualties | Operation Enduring Freedom | Afghanistan

David, what these figures don't show is the number of serious injuries incurred, many of which result in life long disablement and disfigurement for the young soldiers involved. Modern military medical procedures are very good and the seriously wounded who might have died in the past can now be kept alive to lead a life very different to that which a fit young man might have expected. I don't know the figures but suspect that these seriously injured casualties far outnumber the fatalities.

I think I am a reasonably intelligent person who keeps abreast of world affairs but I have no idea what we are doing in Afghanistan, where even the majority of the local population doesn't seem to want us there - or have I missed something?

Chris
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Chris - A very timely point that you make. I think the modern triage and first aid procedures in the field means thankfully we have more people surviving. I would hazard a guess that its gone from about 4 injured that survive compared with one fatality to about seven or even eight to one now. Forty percent of soldiers injured actually stay in Afghanistan now, and return to their duties, which is a massive improvement in the medical facilities and the people who run them - many of whom are volunteer reserves from our local hospitals - people who are actually in the Territorial Army (T.A.)
You are also right in our second point - neither you or me and probably most of our GT40 colleagues have any idea as to why we are still there. You missed nothing.
Please write to your MP.
Dave
 
Last edited:

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
<TABLE class=Smalltable id=ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_countryGridView style="BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse" cellSpacing=0 rules=all border=1><TBODY><TR class=contactDept><TH scope=col>Country</TH><TH scope=col>Total</TH></TR><TR><TD>Australia</TD><TD class=contactNumber>11</TD></TR><TR><TD>Belgium</TD><TD class=contactNumber>1</TD></TR><TR><TD>Canada</TD><TD class=contactNumber>131</TD></TR><TR><TD>Czech</TD><TD class=contactNumber>3</TD></TR><TR><TD>Denmark</TD><TD class=contactNumber>25</TD></TR><TR><TD>Estonia</TD><TD class=contactNumber>6</TD></TR><TR><TD>Finland</TD><TD class=contactNumber>1</TD></TR><TR><TD>France</TD><TD class=contactNumber>31</TD></TR><TR><TD>Germany</TD><TD class=contactNumber>33</TD></TR><TR><TD>Hungary</TD><TD class=contactNumber>2</TD></TR><TR><TD>Italy</TD><TD class=contactNumber>21</TD></TR><TR><TD>Latvia</TD><TD class=contactNumber>3</TD></TR><TR><TD>Lithuania</TD><TD class=contactNumber>1</TD></TR><TR><TD>Netherlands</TD><TD class=contactNumber>21</TD></TR><TR><TD>Norway</TD><TD class=contactNumber>4</TD></TR><TR><TD>Poland</TD><TD class=contactNumber>13</TD></TR><TR><TD>Portugal</TD><TD class=contactNumber>2</TD></TR><TR><TD>Romania</TD><TD class=contactNumber>11</TD></TR><TR><TD>South Korea</TD><TD class=contactNumber>1</TD></TR><TR><TD>Spain</TD><TD class=contactNumber>25</TD></TR><TR><TD>Sweden</TD><TD class=contactNumber>2</TD></TR><TR><TD>Turkey</TD><TD class=contactNumber>2</TD></TR><TR><TD>UK</TD><TD class=contactNumber>217</TD></TR><TR><TD>US</TD><TD class=contactNumber>842</TD></TR><TR class=contactDept><TD>Total</TD><TD align=right>1409</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Last edited:

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Yet another British Soldier - his third tour in Helmand and previously in Northern Ireland and Bosnia. He had just been decorated with the Military Cross.

Ironically, the newspapers afforded his death with less column inches than our first black woman Attorney General Lady Scotland who has just been fined £5000 for contravening an immigrant employment law that she helped to introduce.
Will Gordon Brown sack her? I doubt it.
Will he get back in power next year? I doubly doubt that as well.
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
She is equating this offence with forgetting to pay her congestion charge for driving in London. She would wouldn't she ! Where did this woman, this so called Attorney General get her law degree ?
Chelmsford Polytechnic. That says it all...........
Was it Chelmsford Poly that used to do a Bachelor of Art Degree in Finger Nail Painting as well ? Maybe that was Aberystwith.
Previous Attorney Generals must be squirming as they watch this buffoon.
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
The noose tightens around this womans neck. The irony is she will be sacrificed (justly so) on a sacrificial altar of her own making. Her Parliamentary Private Secretary has resigned in the last hour protesting that Brown is doing nothing to sack her. If she was a magistrate, (a D.A.?) she would have been kicked off the bench almost as soon as this scandal broke. The next 24 hours in the life of Lady Scotland , the first black Attorney General, will be the stuff of the front pages right up to the weekend. Wonderful.
Roll on the weekend. She will get more than her hand slapped.
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
From the Telegraph on line:
By Bob Graham
Published: 9:03PM BST 23 Sep 2009
Comments 13 | Comment on this article

lockett_1486812c.jpg
Sgt Michael Lockett was killed by a roadside bomb Photo: PA


On Armistice Day for the past two years a text message arrived with the simple phrase: " 'We WILL Remember Them', best wishes, Locky." The four simple words, from Laurence Binyon's First World War poem, went out to all those on the mobile phone list of Acting Sergeant Michael Lockett. The message said it all as far as Locky was concerned. He would not, could not, forget his mates, and he wanted everyone he knew to remember them, too.
I first met Acting Sergeant Michael Lockett and the surviving men from his platoon in the heat and dust of Helmand, in the aftermath of the battle on September 8, 2007 that claimed the lives of two of their colleagues and left five more injured.They were young men who had endured the worst the Taliban could throw at them, having spent weeks under fire at Forward Operating Base (FOB) Delhi, the southern-most British base in Helmand. Over many hours we sat drinking tea and replaying the events that had taken place the night before, occasionally interrupted as the younger soldiers approached and sought fatherly advice from Lockett, himself just 27 at the time. Nearly all asked Locky what they should do, how they should feel. He treated each with a kind word and gentle advice; for some an arm around the shoulder, for others a bit of soldiering banter.
Over the next year or so, I met Lockett and spoke to him further: he was proud, humbled and perhaps even a little embarrassed by the Military Cross he was awarded as a result of that battle. But the image of Locky that sticks in my mind is not the haunting picture of him receiving his medal from the Queen – a dignified moment he would have treasured – but of him sitting in the shade of a tent, beating himself up for the death of Sgt Craig Brelsford, who died trying to recover the body of Pte Johan Botha from the battlefield.
Locky was Army born and bred. He lived and breathed it, trusted it, and finally died for it on Monday.
That he was leading his platoon of the 2nd Battalion The Mercian Regiment on a foot patrol, on his third tour in Afghanistan, when he was killed by a roadside bomb was no surprise. Locky would not ask anyone to do what he would not do himself, and invariably that meant he led from the front.
Acting Sgt Michael Lockett is the first holder of the MC to die in battle since the Second World War. At the time, he was preparing the young soldiers from the Yorkshire Regiment who had just arrived in Helmand to replace Locky's boys.
During our first meeting, which lasted several hours, Locky sat talking with immense pride of his Army upbringing. His father Malcolm still serves with 225 General Support Medical, and his mother April was formerly with the Royal Military Police. "I love the Army," he said, his smiling face still caked with the dust and sand from the battlefield. There was not an ounce of cynicism or regret in his statement, just an acceptance that the night before, being in the Army had cost the lives of two of his closest friends and left five more probably disabled for the rest of their lives.
That didn't stop him feeling anger for what had taken place. During the ambush by the Taliban, firing wave after wave of machine-gun fire and RPGs, he heard over his radio that five of his men had gone down, all within a few yards of where the Taliban were hiding. In the darkness, he and several of the survivors from the Mercians' 'A' Company crawled to the ditch to help organise a group to rescue the injured, who still lay in the open field.
Locky could hear in his ear-piece the pleas of one of his injured soldiers, Private Luke Cole. "He kept saying over and over 'Mick, come and get me….Mick, come and get me.e_SSRq" It was a plea that went to the core of everything Locky had told his men. "Before we came out to Afghanistan on this tour," he said, "I promised my men that as platoon sergeant I'd bring them back, if not alive, then their bodies would come home. That was my line in the sand, no matter what happened, everyone was coming back. And in that situation, if it meant going back into the face of enemy fire, I didn't give a rat's ass about what it took, I wanted my men back. We would not leave anyone behind."
He asked for volunteers to accompany him into the 'killing zone' to rescue their fallen comrades, an action that resulted in all four of those who went being awarded medals for bravery.
Privately, in the months that followed, there were many who believed that at least two VCs should have been awarded for the bravery shown that night, including one to Locky. That the ultimate medal of bravery was not given was a decision not based on deed, rather on the accepted political expediency that what happens in battle is not always reflected in the byzantine corridors of Whitehall.
Locky and his small squad of volunteers managed to rescue five of their colleagues, but could not find Private Botha, a South African who was one of the most popular members of the platoon.
The platoon commander, Lt Simon Cupples, asked for reinforcements to try to reach Botha, and a second platoon, led by Sgt Brelsford, was nearby. Locky added: "When we asked for volunteers Brellsie stepped forward. It was like a scene out of Saving Private Ryan. I simply grabbed him and whispered in his ear: 'Brellsie, I need you to go and get the big man for me.' He understood.
"His last words to me were: 'Mick, no dramas, don't worry about it, don't worry'. And I wasn't worried, Brellsie was leading one of our own platoons and he was going to get our boy out there. He'd come to help us when we needed him."
In the ensuing battle, Sgt Brelsford was killed and the company commanding officer, Maj Jamie Nowell, decided to withdraw the soldiers to base and use heavily armoured vehicles to go in search of Botha's body. But Locky had other ideas. "I was having none of it. I asked for more volunteers to go and get Botha back. Every hand went up again, no hesitation."
In stepped Lt Cupples to repeat the order to return to base. "I refused. I was not leaving my man on the ground, it was breaking my heart. I didn't know if Botha was dead or alive – although in my eyes he was not dead, he was missing in action. I sat there crying, knowing this was to be the hardest decision in my life, to extract from the battlefield and leave my man there." Eventually, he agreed to return to the base. But he added: "I could not look at the other lads when we went in ... I thought I'd lost their trust."
The following day, during our interview, Locky kept going over in his mind what more he could have done to brief his fellow sergeant. "Did I do enough, did I give him enough info? Could I have done more, acted differently and he wouldn't have been hit? Is it my fault? That's what's going on in my head now."
It was a question Locky still had not answered when we met in Chesterfield many months later. In the period that followed the Mercians' return to the UK, Locky spent much of his time with the young family he adored: his girlfriend Belinda and three children, Connor, Chloe and Courtney.
He also ensured that every member of his platoon took time to visit their injured colleagues in hospitals in various parts of the country. "We will remember them," he said time and again, emphasising that "they were part of us in battle and they're part of us now. Their battle is different and it's our duty to help them through it."
The plight of Pte Sam Cooper, who was severely injured and in Headley Court, the Defence Medical Rehabiliation Centre in Surrey, was of particular concern and Locky ensured that a constant stream of his fellow soldiers attended his bedside.
When I next saw Locky it was in a pub in Chesterfield in March 2008, on the day the Mercians were awarded the freedom of the city. Locky was on leave at the time but drove up to Derbyshire from his home in Devizes to push the wheelchair of Sam Cooper, who had just been released from hospital.
As we stood in a city centre pub at lunchtime, waiting for a small parade of the Mercian soldiers to begin, a group of young men were knocking back pints and generally ridiculing the soldiers who stood in ranks outside in their uniform.
Locky went over and spoke to them, explaining that the soldiers were "ordinary young men, just like you, they have the same dreams, desires and interests as you ... They're doing an extraordinary job for their country, not because they want to but because their government, your government, has asked them to." The group listened to Locky and when he finished, each of the drinkers put down their glasses and shook him by the hand, apologising for their earlier rudeness.
Later, as Locky pushed Cooper in his wheelchair to a reception at the Civic Centre, he was stopped by a couple of mothers who wanted to tell him how proud they felt of his sacrifice. One of the mothers described how she despaired of her son's bad behaviour and failure to get a job. Locky gave her his telephone number and said: "If I didn't have the Army, I'd probably be like him. It's my best friend, it provides me with friendships that will last for ever. It's not easy but its qualities will last with me for ever. If he wants, tell him to call me and I'll have a chat."
Months later, it was announced that Locky had been awarded the MC, as had his dead comrade Sgt Brelsford. He was sanguine about the medal: "Of course it's an honour and I shall wear it with pride," he said. "But attached to it are the memories of Brellsie and Botha, two mates and no matter what the medal says, it can't bring them back.
"In some ways handing out medals is not part of what I'm about or what my mates in the platoon are about. Everything we do, we do together and for each other."
 
David +1
Learned this morning that my friend and Vietnamese counterpart is still alive. Been wondering about him for 43 years! He was imprisioned by the communists in 1975 and released in 1998. One of our old team (VN) Lt. Col's in California created an association of VN members worldwide to track down and assist the other surviving members of our bunch! I joined this this morning...

Lest we forget...
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
Jack,
isn't that amazing and so wonderful to hear about.
I'm a member of 203 squadron website - probably one of the most active squadrons in the so called 'cold war' era and which is a great website to keep in touch with the people involved in the Nimrod and Shackleton at the time that I was in the services. It has a sad side as well as no one gets any younger but , hey, thats life. The old adage - 'see if there are any cigarettes in his locker' still rings true to this day and so long after leaving the serice is still respected.
( this was a euphamism to make sure there was no trace of anything that the family would not want to see or know about)
 

David Morton

Lifetime Supporter
The Daily Telegraph has been wonderfully instrumental in exposing the MPs expense saga
and this article follows on from those exposées.

MPs' expenses leaked over failure to equip troops on front line in Afghanistan and Iraq
Expenses claims made by MPs were leaked because of anger over the Government’s failure to equip the Armed Forces properly while politicians lavished taxpayers’ money on themselves, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.

By Robert Winnett and Gordon Rayner
Published: 7:00AM BST 25 Sep 2009

A claim by Sir Peter Viggers for a duck house costing £1,645 came to symbolise the expenses scandal. But soldiers working in the stationery office were outraged at the treatment of their comrades in Afghanistan
Workers who processed the MPs’ claims included serving soldiers, who were moonlighting between tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan to earn extra cash for body armour and other vital equipment.

The soldiers were furious when they saw what MPs, including the Prime Minister, were claiming for and their anger convinced one of their civilian colleagues that taxpayers had a right to know how their money was being spent.


Related Articles
How disbelief turned to anger among workers processing claims
Fury over soldiers' plight blew lid on MPs' expenses
Inside MPs' expenses scandal
No Expenses Spared: the inside story The mole who leaked the data has told his story for the first time, in the hope that it will shame the Government into finally supplying the right equipment for the thousands of soldiers risking their lives in Afghanistan.

His account appears in No Expenses Spared, a book which is published today and discloses the full story of what Gordon Brown described as “the biggest Parliamentary scandal for two centuries”.

Five months after The Daily Telegraph broke the story of MPs’ expenses, the mole angrily denounced politicians who “still don’t get it” and were still preoccupied with their own financial situation rather than the plight of troops.

“It’s not easy to watch footage on the television news of a coffin draped in a Union Jack and then come in to work the next day and see on your computer screen what MPs are taking for themselves,” he said.

“Hearing from the serving soldiers, about how they were having to work there to earn enough money to buy themselves decent equipment, while the MPs could find public money to buy themselves all sorts of extravagances, only added to the feeling that the public should know what was going on.

“That helped tip the balance in the decision over whether I should or should not leak the expenses data.”

The Daily Telegraph’s investigation of MPs’ expense claims exposed widespread abuse of the Parliamentary allowance system, including the “flipping” of second homes, systematic tax avoidance, “phantom” mortgages and claims for fripperies such as moat cleaning, manure and a duck house. Some MPs even attempted to claim for wreaths which they laid at remembrance ceremonies.

No Expenses Spared, written by two members of the Telegraph’s investigation team, describes how employees at The Stationery Office, where the expense files were sent for censorship before their intended publication by Parliament, reacted when they first saw the claims for second homes, furniture and luxury goods.

The workers, who included Parliamentary staff on secondment, became so agitated that they had to be told to calm down by managers.

One of the expenses that particularly enraged staff was Gordon Brown’s claim for a Sky TV sports package, which cost £36 per month.

But it was the position of the soldiers, who had used their annual leave to find temporary work as security guards, that caused the most outrage. “As the days progressed the soldiers joined in the conversations and became as angry as those doing the editing,” the mole said.

“When they’re out in Afghanistan they’re out there for Queen and country, earning £16,000 or £17,000 a year, knowing they’re going to take losses, while the MPs are sitting in Parliament on £65,000, with massive expenses, and meanwhile you’ve got bodies coming home.”

The Prime Minister, who faces a critical test of his leadership at next week’s Labour Party conference, has faced repeated criticism over the equipment that has been issued to troops and for his lacklustre handling of the expenses scandal.

No Expenses Spared discloses that the mole was employed to censor MPs’ expenses paperwork in 2008 before it was published this year.

Around 20 people at a time worked on blacking out parts of the files. The soldiers were among the security guards who were there to prevent any of the information being leaked.

One of the soldiers had taken on the temporary work, in contravention of Army regulations, to earn enough money to buy a lightweight Kevlar ballistic vest similar to those issued to US troops. Many British soldiers have complained that the standard issue body armour was so heavy and bulky that it was more of a hindrance than a help in a firefight.

Another soldier was there to earn money to buy desert boots, gloves and sunglasses, while other servicemen were earning to buy Christmas presents for their families.

The mole said: “The people who were working on redacting the MPs’ expenses were people who were proud to be British, and they were saddened by what they saw.

“Everyone in that room was of the same mind. This was our money and these were our employees, effectively, but no one could hold them to account.

“Pretty much everyone working in that room was being paid a pittance to do their job. Meanwhile the MPs were being well paid and claiming a fortune on their expenses, yet what have they done for us in the last 10 years?

“That was why I leaked the information: because the British public deserves better.”

The furore over the leak of the expenses data has put the mole under intense pressure and he faced the threat of a police investigation. He wishes to remain anonymous.

The mole leaked the MPs’ expenses data, which amounted to more than 1.5 million individual receipts, to John Wick, a former SAS officer who acted as a middle man in negotiations with The Daily Telegraph.

The mole told the book’s authors that he was “bloody glad” he released the information. “There’s no two ways about it. I saw what was happening. I saw that information, and you just couldn’t keep that from people,” he said.

“Now that The Daily Telegraph has put this in the public domain, it has to bring about reform.”

But the mole said he had been disappointed with the response of MPs so far.

“Do they get it? I don’t know. We had a knee-jerk reaction from all the parties initially... [But now] when you listen to MPs I think they are more concerned about themselves and keeping their jobs than getting on with reform and changing our Parliament.

“Do you think Alan Duncan gets it? I don’t know. I listen to various statements made by MPs and I’m not so sure they do get it at all yet.

“I know certain members do and I know that not all MPs were guilty. Not all MPs had their snouts in the trough. Nevertheless they all knew what was happening. Those that didn’t have their snouts in the trough did nothing to stop it.”

Despite public anger over their expenses, MPs have continued to claim thousands of pounds for food, mortgages and other costs.

Within the next month, Sir Christopher Kelly, the official standards watchdog, is expected to recommend radical changes to the Parliamentary expenses system. However, MPs are pushing for large pay rises to compensate for any loss of the lucrative expenses. They can currently claim more than £24,000 a year towards the cost of a second home.

Meanwhile, the Government has refused to bow to soldiers’ demands for better equipment similar to that given to American troops.

The disclosure of such a direct link between the summer’s scandal and the ongoing row over military equipment will put ministers under increasing pressure to ensure that soldiers are properly equipped before sending them into battle. Dozens of deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan have been blamed on inferior or faulty equipment issued to the Armed Forces.

Last weekend, the widow of Sjt Paul McAleese, who was killed on August 20 by a Taliban bomb, suggested that the Government’s failure properly to equip soldiers was akin to manslaughter.

Sjt McAleese had spent £1,000 of his own money to buy a lightweight ballistic vest, desert boots and ballistic goggles, the same equipment as that wanted by the soldiers who worked at The Stationery Office.

Jo McAleese said: “We must either give our soldiers the kit they need to survive or get them out of there.”

Last night, the Ministry of Defence insisted that the Armed Forces were properly equipped.

A spokesman said: “Our top priority is to provide the best equipment and training for our people in Afghanistan.

“Both are excellent, and are improving all the time. Commanders now have a variety of helicopters, protected patrol vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles and other key equipment at their disposal, and we are committed to ensuring that their needs are met, both in the short and long term.

“Since 2006, we have delivered equipment valued at more than £10 billion to the Armed Forces, including over £4 billion on urgent operational requirements since 2006.”
 
Start a movement to put members on a social security pension plan (welfare) and no salary. Only than will they "get it".

I have often thought that our representatives should be volunteers with no big salaries, just living expenses. That would really change things for the better...
 
Back
Top