It's in all of the Pathfinder Youtube promotional videos ("1966 GT40"). Go to the Youtube site, search for Pathfinder Motorsports and you'll see the video description below inserted by Alan/Pathfinder.
It's a basic misrepresentation of fact about a product being sold in commercial activity. The Youtube videos are there for product promotion and business development, plain and simple.
If I'm the bad guy for pointing out this minor factual misrepresentation that's fine with me, I'm not bothered by it.
You have once again gone out of your way to tell the readers on this board that Pathfinder Motorsports is engaged in lying, false advertising, and breaking the law. Why? Because we refer to our race-prepared continuation cars by the year they represent - and you don't like that.
As I explained previously, we market and build our cars to reflect the build-year that the owner intends to race their GT40. That's the way it's done in FIA and most European and Japanese vintage and historic racing. A 1965 GT40R continuation car must race under Period F, while a 1966 car races under Period G. Pretty simple, yet you're incapable of understanding that - and indeed go on to imply that Pathfinder is trying to sell continuation cars as authentic vintage '60's-era GT40s. Of course, that is absurd - and may rise to the level of libel and vilification. For someone who claims to be an attorney, Cliff, you have a remarkable deficit in reasoning ability let alone common sense.
So, turning the spotlight on you, Cliff, what do we find?
• Cliff Beer was previously banned from this website for his alleged duplicity;
• Cliff Beer has been accused on this board of employing false accounts to bolster his allegiance to CAV while taking shots at RCR and Superformance/Pathfinder;
• Cliff Beer has been accused of sending emails under false cover to members of GT40s.com in an attempt to intimidate them; and,
• Cliff Beer tracked down a video of Pathfinder's on YouTube and trashed it in the comments section claiming that we were fraudsters, all the while using a pseudonym that was later confirmed as belonging to him.
Perhaps most remarkably, Cliff, you act incensed that we would call one of our cars a '1966 GT40 continuation car by Superformance', yet you had to admit back in 2009 (over this exact issue) that you registered your personal GT40 as having been built in 1966! You subsequently lied about that on this very thread claiming, "my car is a 2006 CAV GT40. That's what it is, always will be, and nothing more or less than I have ever indicated in the past". Don't you realize that you can't run away from your record?
It hasn't been difficult to assemble an impressive number of additional quotes about you, written by fellow members on GT40s.com over the years. It doesn't paint a flattering picture, but more importantly, it speaks directly to your character and what is motivating what may already constitute calumny and libel. I don't know why or on who's behalf you may have started this vendetta, but it's about time you put it to rest.