You guys are all funny. You all bring out exceptions to the rule (oh and that airline pilot PRACTICED THAT EXACT LANDING MANY MANY MANY TIMES). Remember my statement about training a monkey. Also the example of working with vets who have been outside of the military for some time and had a chance to wait for it RETRAIN THEMSELVES more to the point retrain their thought process is laughable. The fact that the unemployment rate is so high for vets is proof positive that the military isn't turning out productive citizens outside of the military arena. As a boss I would love vets because they understand chain of command and it is INSTILLED in them not to question the boss. they ARE great followers BUT NOT GREAT LEADERS. You all keep making my point for me. Listen I come from a LONG line of military families (brother currently serving in the navy, cousins in the army, even a cousin in the marines, and father and uncle both retired from the military, and both sets of grandparents were military) and those that joined today out of an escape from reality are not even close to those that joined out of wanting to serve GOD and country for days of old. Todays recruits cry when asked to fight not cheer for it. If you don't want to fight or have the possibility of losing you life in the name of GOD and country than why join the military? This whole change in the mentality of the common recruit is what you all refuse to admit is running ramped in todays military. Again your point about west point keeps proving me my point not yours as MOST service men do NOT attend such places so stop using that please. As hot as this topic is when you all step away from this and think about it I bet you will mostly agree. Hey some are meant to lead and some are meant to serve. Officers if not lifers leave soon after to get away from the knuckle heads in the military and move to the private sector which leads to some's pet pieve (the private sector doing it better than the military). Ask yourself this fella's ... who does MOST of the development for the military ... the private sector or the armed forces themselves. Here is a hint the U.S. military sure isn't building any drones or aircraft are they ( I wish they did but the reality is they are not)?
Damian, you're talking through your hat. You are also thoroughly unfamiliar with the federal procurement process. The military forecasts requirements and bid developmental and construction contracts. It would not be legal for the military to open its own aircraft factory and compete with the private sector.
I also don't think most will agree that Sullenberger's decision process under the pressure he was under was something you could get a monkey to do or was only the product of rote training with little independent assessment and decision making. He went back swimming underwater into the rear of the plane, even though it was sinking to insure all the passengers got out probably wasn't in the manual and I suspect a lesser man would not have chosen to do so (see Costa Concordia Captain).
It's also apparent don't have a clue as to the military education system or how the chain of command works. (By the way, Colin Powell was an ROTC graduate.) Soldiers are trained to provide leaders input and successful officers listen to their NCO's. Patton was quoted as saying, “If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking.” Military leaders are taught to listen to their staff, their troops and make decisions. If they don’t listen, they don’t get very far. But when a decision is made, it is supported.
You've never been in the military, you don't know. But given the intensity of your biases, I suspect you're not open to find out. I would submit that bias such as yours has much more to do with the sad state of veteran’s employment than any lack of productivity of returning vets. I can't speak to whatever issues you may have had with the military members of your family. But it is clear you are emotional in your bias and dead wrong.
You assessment as to why people join the military as some sort of escape also doesn't gel with the data. New enlistees are polled as to why they came in the military. Number one citing service to country as their main motivation went from 27.5 percent of all responses in 2002 to 38.1 percent in 2006. (It was followed by skills acquisition, cited by 20.2 percent, then by adventure, mentioned by 16.4 percent, then by money for education, benefits, travel, and pay.) Certainly the recent job market would probably influence subsequent data.
I have a feeling you probably would not enjoy basic training or OCS but it would probably be amusing to watch…