Point very well taken David but was it not ever so in the whole history of the British Armed Forces going back to Charles I. Whatever the quality of equipment and protection, today's strategies call for "MKI eyeball" contact with the enemy, especially when serving in regions with potentially unfriendly 'natives' who cannot be easily determined from the bad guys and one of the reasons that the US with their resources, have taken to the skies. It was never possible in Aden, Northern Ireland, Iraq and now Afghanistan.
But, wholesale corruption and the "old boy network" on the part of MOD suppliers and Whitehall have played a very serious part in the "untimely demise" of hundreds of thousands of our finest never mind the 'policing' difficulties..
For just one example, who can forget the debacle of WWII 'Market Garden'. Popular to blame Monty for 5,000 casualties but a fantastic strategy let down by what?
Wrong crystals in radio sets.
Failed Intelligence
Wildly inaccurate navigation for parachute main drop.
Supplies dropped in German hands.
Lastly and most telling: Red berets (hats) dropped in bulk in stead of food, ammunition and the correct VHF radio crystals.
Before that: The Raid on Dieppe. Tanks can't operate in shingle. I know that and I don't drive tracked vehicles. So, who
didn't know that?
Gulf 1. Challenger I failure through inadequate sand filters. SA80 Assault Rifle (commisioned by MOD and built in UK) utterly useless in dusty, cold and muddy conditions. Again, who
didn't know that?
Those are just a couple of examples of the scandal of equipment and logistic inadequacy that the British Armed Forces have had to endure going back hundreds of years. If anyone has the time, I'll list many many more.
Regretfully, the fighting spirit ability of our very fine Armed Forces have been much maligned in recent years and I totally blame Whitehall and the "Old School Tie" for the unecessary and premature demise of these brave guys and now of course, guyettes.
Winston once said "Give us the tools and we'll do the job." Was he ever so right.
As for "should we even be there?" The British soldier does not and never has to my knowledge ever questioned his orders but does the best he can under the cirumstances where ever he serves. His not to reason why and I am very aware that comments we make here in the UK can have an adverse effect on morale and the possibility of more needless deaths and I just hate handing propaganda tools to the 'enemy' who capitalise on what we would call our 'humanity' and they would call an abject weakness.
It's a fine balance, so I would always suggest the "Ninja" approach to politicians to get the point across.
