abandoned cars

Glenn M

Supporter
And to think the joke used to be;

What do you call a Skoda with a sun roof?....................a skip

That's the best use for a beemer I've seen in a long time! Brilliant!

Glenn
 

Larry L.

Lifetime Supporter
I've always believed there's no such thing as having too much money...but these photos have me wondering whether that is true or not.
 
The "F40" looks more like a Fiero conversion....

So a painted Delorean, a Crossfire and a VW kit are "Dream cars???" More like a nightmare me thinks!
 
Hold on there Kangaroo court judges . The poor chap partly financed a property deal that went down the pan through the recession with absolutely no wrong doing on his part. In your eyes does that really justify being locked up in a rat infested hell hole of a jail in the desert?

Bob
 

Keith

Moderator
Yes. You speculate in those places at your peril. He obviously didn't do an adequate risk assessment or he was plain greedy.

Plenty of projects to invest in at home without the downside risk.
 

Larry L.

Lifetime Supporter
The poor chap partly financed a property deal that went down the pan through the recession with absolutely no wrong doing on his part.

When you say he 'partially financed' a deal...do you mean he did do so with his own money, or did he use borrowed money?

If the former, then (w/o knowing what his exact responsibilities/type of agreements made actually were) 'twould appear to be a "no harm no foul" situation as you suggest. But, if the latter - he 'stuck' someone else with his debt by "walking away". (An example of the latter would be if he ordered/received items from suppliers, 'cash flow from the property deal dried up, so he walked away from the supply bill.)

What I'm saying is, anytime someone takes on debt, it's his responsibility to service it. One does not just walk away and leave it for some other party to deal with/absorb.
 
When you say he 'partially financed' a deal...do you mean he did do so with his own money, or did he use borrowed money?

If the former, then (w/o knowing what his exact responsibilities/type of agreements made actually were) 'twould appear to be a "no harm no foul" situation as you suggest. But, if the latter - he 'stuck' someone else with his debt by "walking away". (An example of the latter would be if he ordered/received items from suppliers, 'cash flow from the property deal dried up, so he walked away from the supply bill.)

What I'm saying is, anytime someone takes on debt, it's his responsibility to service it. One does not just walk away and leave it for some other party to deal with/absorb.


You should tell that to the US government, $17.6 trillion and growing. If the fucking politicians run off it might be worth it! $7 trillion in the last 5 1/2 years. Cost a lot of money to do fund raisers.
 
Last edited:

Larry L.

Lifetime Supporter
You should tell that to the US government, $17.6 trillion and growing. If the fucking politicians run off it might be worth it! $7 trillion in the last 5 1/2 years. Cost a lot of money to do fund raisers.

'Been screaming about all the IDIOT spending levels for decades, Al.
 
Back
Top