JimmyMac
Lifetime Supporter
Cliff, I suspect everyone on this forum agrees we should reduce pollution in all it’s forms. So, how much do you want to reduce, and how much are you willing to give up/pay to achieve the reduction? Not just in cost of fuel, but across the board in the economy? Industry in the U.S., economic growth, jobs? And what should we demand as a minimum result, or target for the price? Then how do we go about getting the rest of the world to participate, or do we go it alone and set the example, in effect handicapping our ability to compete with the likes of the rising Chinese star? Can we /Man actually manipulate global climate?
We shouldn’t use the E85 example you and Crash33 discussed, since it seems agreed that ethanol requires more energy to produce than it returns, whatever the percentage. It is also less efficient than gas, again whether it’s 15% or 40%. So, in the long view, we should dump ethanol because it puts more pollution/greenhouse gas into the atmosphere than it saves, right, even if it should be 15%-40$ cheaper…(but it isn’t! It’s more expensive. We’re paying more for what is less efficient and puts out more pollution. Obviously a boondoggle, only making sense to farmers)…to say nothing of the increased water demand and the reduction in available food for the poor starving masses of the world!
I want to help husband the Earth (not some politician’s pet pork project nor one of the 10?12? green companies Gore’s investment holding company sponsors. Gore’s rise from a net worth of maybe 2 million to over 100 million in less than 10 years suggests Green is a profitable color). Tell me how!
CliffI don't give a shite about Al Gore, self interested politicians, scientific experts, or the EPA or the UN, it's plainly clear to me that we are trashing this planet with human pollution of all kinds, including pollution from internal combustion engines and we need to change our ways - dramatically, and immediately. I also don't give a shite if the current climate change that's in motion is man-made or natural, doesn't matter one bit, it's going to be painful for everyone over the long haul as people are going to starve in some places, people are going to suffer displacement and people's health is going to be negatively affected. Anything we can do now which might possibly slow the process is worth doing.
If the solution for changing our polluting ways includes scrubbers on stacks, tax dis-incentives, prohibition upon certain compounds/chemicals, tighter vehicle emission standards, extra industrial processes, recycling, etc. then so be it - stop whining or suggesting it's all a big hoax and get on with the work of changing our ways and improving our environment. It's really not that complicated once you accept that a continuation of the past will result in continued environmental degradation. I have four kids and I want them to be able to catch a fish one day, run in the rain, drink from the garden hose, see some old growth timber, swim in a lake - all the things that I did when I was a kid.
OK, I'll shut up now.
Cliff
If you think you're gonna live on this planet and not leave a TEMPORARY mark you"re kidding yourself.. ( you dispose of trash don't you)
But lets say for the sake of argument we (the US.) get rid of all pollution creating cars and industries....
What ya gonna do when China shits in your water?
I mean lets get real.. If you can't convince the world and I mean the whole world into following your line of thinking..than what? clean 1/2 the ocean and maybe 1/2 the sky? its silly..
Maybe YOU should concentrate on cleaning the lake YOUR kids will be swimming in. Have you ever gone to that lake to pick up garbage, bottles ,cans, old tires etc.......well have you?...or do I have to go and do it for you....again.