Fat Larry's GTR Build

Ok thinks are slowly coming together the engine is packed and ready to make the trip home from Calf along with my extremely expensive ECU but I guess someone has to be the first in everything l installed my estop emergency brake system today very nice kit and works well.
 

Attachments

  • 76931F29-D7F3-4641-A4AA-40C369417A76.jpeg
    76931F29-D7F3-4641-A4AA-40C369417A76.jpeg
    350.9 KB · Views: 379
  • A3670D72-8B51-41B7-99B8-8B87F0C920FA.jpeg
    A3670D72-8B51-41B7-99B8-8B87F0C920FA.jpeg
    399 KB · Views: 377
  • 681F4B5A-D6CA-4A71-B35E-18D8F59F0973.jpeg
    681F4B5A-D6CA-4A71-B35E-18D8F59F0973.jpeg
    343.9 KB · Views: 358
  • 41E24EC9-392F-44F4-98B6-DBF8D6FE0194.jpeg
    41E24EC9-392F-44F4-98B6-DBF8D6FE0194.jpeg
    394.4 KB · Views: 396
So this weekend finished up with the modifications to the front suspension that H and Kurtiss did to their cars and installed the Ramlift nice system just don’t like the braided lines they give you I will be switching them out for # 4 AN brake lines. I also received my ECU from Calf Danzio Performance so I started to make mounts for the system.
 

Attachments

  • CD99FA40-57E3-43A7-B560-3F04E11CCAB2.jpeg
    CD99FA40-57E3-43A7-B560-3F04E11CCAB2.jpeg
    453.4 KB · Views: 360
  • CB5E7A2E-3F47-4B08-BF96-0EF35BA4A459.jpeg
    CB5E7A2E-3F47-4B08-BF96-0EF35BA4A459.jpeg
    411.7 KB · Views: 370
  • E0C48D4A-8C52-4EBF-A8DA-75CA8F3EEA47.jpeg
    E0C48D4A-8C52-4EBF-A8DA-75CA8F3EEA47.jpeg
    498.7 KB · Views: 369
  • B62AF018-9AB6-4F33-B227-3F4E34433A6A.jpeg
    B62AF018-9AB6-4F33-B227-3F4E34433A6A.jpeg
    428.7 KB · Views: 394
can't wait to see pics of it installed! Will it go in fully assembled, or do you need to remove portions ? (ie. headers, turbos,...)
 
Normally I bolt the trans to the motor and put it in one piece but since everything is detailed now I am taking my time not too scratch anything up I am waiting on clutch to flywheel bolts from Audi just a word of caution don’t use the bolts from McMaster Carr even though they have a tensile strength of 170,000 lbs they break before being fully torqued down
 

Neil

Supporter
"...just a word of caution don’t use the bolts from McMaster Carr even though they have a tensile strength of 170,000 lbs they break before being fully torqued down "

Something's wrong here. What bolts are they? What torque value breaks them? What torque wrench is being used? Are the threads lubricated and with what?
 

Brian Kissel

Staff member
Admin
Lifetime Supporter
Larry, 70 ft lbs is way way too much for a M6 bolt. M6 is about the size of a 1/4" US bolt. For one of the best out there (12.9 grade), 12 foot ponds is the requirement. Look here.

What is the torque spec on a 6mm bolt?
Torque. Different bolt sizes and grades have different torque specifications. For example, 6mm bolts with a 10.9 grade have a maximum torque value of 10 foot-pounds, while the same-size bolts with a 12.9 grade have a maximum torque value of 12 foot-pounds. Consult your shop manual for the most precise listings.
Reference: www.ehow.co.uk/facts_7677450_metric-torque-specifications-bolts.html


Regards Brian
 

Neil

Supporter
Even Unobtanium 6mm bolts won't take 70 ft lbs of torque. re-check the torque chart that you were using.
 
Ron you are correct when I looked into the proper torq for the bolts I thought it was ft lbs it turned out to be inch pounds so 71 inch lbs is equivalent to around 6 ft pounds no wonder they snapped well what’s the old saying you learn something every day
 
So today I was able to finish the fabrication of the ECU mounts and then I powder coated everything I also changed out the hydraulic lines for the Ram Lift system with 4 an brake lines more confident knowing there will be no leaks. I also changed the clutch master to a 1 inch dia bore cylinder hopefully make it a little easier on the left leg
 

Attachments

  • 71DB80ED-B3DD-45CE-8E52-BCE403569216.jpeg
    71DB80ED-B3DD-45CE-8E52-BCE403569216.jpeg
    567 KB · Views: 285
  • AEB3BD5F-E0FB-4775-87A9-ED0A1B3EAE6F.jpeg
    AEB3BD5F-E0FB-4775-87A9-ED0A1B3EAE6F.jpeg
    307.1 KB · Views: 278
  • 1CCADD24-961C-43FD-9761-ED84E63C5830.jpeg
    1CCADD24-961C-43FD-9761-ED84E63C5830.jpeg
    505.2 KB · Views: 263
  • 6413AD32-B5B1-40DA-AAAD-89E8EF898073.jpeg
    6413AD32-B5B1-40DA-AAAD-89E8EF898073.jpeg
    367.6 KB · Views: 276
  • D0A47B19-7B6E-42EA-AA2B-F7338BD8E36C.jpeg
    D0A47B19-7B6E-42EA-AA2B-F7338BD8E36C.jpeg
    357.2 KB · Views: 264
  • 0E3A7AE8-871D-4D3F-A4B4-1E687D0A634D.jpeg
    0E3A7AE8-871D-4D3F-A4B4-1E687D0A634D.jpeg
    435.4 KB · Views: 304

Joel K

Supporter
Larry,

just thinking through your idea of using a larger MC for the clutch. Wouldn’t a larger MC push more fluid than a smaller one given the same pedal travel so would actually increase the force on the pedal while reducing the travel?
 

Joel K

Supporter
Larger Piston more hydraulic pressure

Larry. I think this explains what I was trying to say better. But I think the 1” bore will increase the pedal effort and not reduce it.

Master cylinder bore size determines the amount of fluid that will be displaced as the clutch is depressed. With equal travel, a 7/8-inch master moves more fluid than a 3/4-inch master. While a larger-bore master cylinder displaces more fluid, it takes more pedal force to create the same pressure as a smaller-diameter bore.
 
So today I finished the gas pedal assembly today and started to wire the ECU wiring
 

Attachments

  • 4DC0EEB7-B561-45B2-9B60-662BC367D32C.jpeg
    4DC0EEB7-B561-45B2-9B60-662BC367D32C.jpeg
    461.1 KB · Views: 282
  • 61059275-22FF-4ABB-BE20-0D0B01317DFD.jpeg
    61059275-22FF-4ABB-BE20-0D0B01317DFD.jpeg
    426.5 KB · Views: 267
  • A74C3EC2-8E17-4403-BEA5-FC215A2BF441.jpeg
    A74C3EC2-8E17-4403-BEA5-FC215A2BF441.jpeg
    423.5 KB · Views: 277
Back
Top