Ford powered XK-E movie car

I don't believe there is any genuine E-type in that car. The firewall certainly doesn't look right....possibly just a fiberglass body on a custom frame. There are some genuine Ford conversions running around since a SBF is one of the few motors you can drop in without altering the engine frame rails (a big no no due to their reynolds construction) I have a 68 2+2 and although the mechanicals can be a love hate relationship I couldn't bring myself to convert.
 

Lynn Larsen

Lynn Larsen
Tim,

Yeah, I was wondering about that. They say they started with an XK-E and then used a special frame and widened the body.......and I am thinking what part of the original car did you use, the suspension??? LOL.

Lynn
 

CliffBeer

CURRENTLY BANNED
There's no E-type in that car at all. Having completed a total nut and bolt restoration of a '64 Series 1 drophead during my college years I can tell what's E-type and what's not and there ain't no E-type in that car.

Looks like a total hack job.
 
I think all they possibly did was splash a mold off an E as a starting point. Cliff did it start out as a total nut and bolt restoration or did you start with one little project that turned into a case of "shiprights disease"? I find when I disasemble something on the E then I look at the components around it and think well if I just take this off and clean and repaint it....well then the parts around it look naf and it kind of snowballs
 

Dave Wood

Lifetime Supporter
MII suspension, surely an indication it was never Jag. It's been 30 year since I had my '63 3.8, but I remember enough that I can tell that if it was ever a Jag someone threw the best parts out. No Girling brakes, no heater motor/box under the bonnet...yep no Jag here, everyone just move on. The Jag for all it's shortcomings was a work of art, this is ...well ...just a work.
 

CliffBeer

CURRENTLY BANNED
MN12 said:
I think all they possibly did was splash a mold off an E as a starting point. Cliff did it start out as a total nut and bolt restoration or did you start with one little project that turned into a case of "shiprights disease"? I find when I disasemble something on the E then I look at the components around it and think well if I just take this off and clean and repaint it....well then the parts around it look naf and it kind of snowballs

Hi Tim,

Well, you're right - it started out as a "cosmetic" restoration on a solid driver. Three years and about a 1,000 hours later it was a total restoration to Pebble Beach standards. I learned a lot. I drove the car in college (the ladies certainly liked it) and then it was sold at a substantial profit.

I know every part of an early E-type - a great car to restore as the original level of design and quality was very high. And, the sound of that 3.8 with straight pipes was just amazing!
 
gt40fran said:
Tim,

so you restored my E type......

Cool.... I wont have to do it....

Not completely. Like cliff I concentrated on a cosmetic restoration of a good driver. At this point all it needs is some interior work
 

Attachments

  • jag1.jpg
    jag1.jpg
    97 KB · Views: 253
  • jag2.jpg
    jag2.jpg
    96 KB · Views: 270
Truly hideous, I too have had several jags including a 69 coupe and that car does not have a single Jag part that I can see. I did drive an XKE back in the late 70's that had a small block Ford in it, belonged to a guy that had an aircraft parts company at Orange County Airport. I flew in there with a buddy of mine, I purchased some parts from this company and mentioned that we were going to Long Beach to a body shop that was painting my buddies Ferrari, the gentleman behind the counter tossed me a set of cars and said take this! We didn't realize it was a V8 until I started it up, it was quite an interesting trip.
 

Keith

Moderator
Dunno why everyone's going on about an XKE when the Ebay listing clearly says XJE.... :confused:

OK ok, so there's still no Jag in it! :p:
 
Back
Top